My user manual says AI fired 10 rounds to test function and accuracy.
I think we will all agree that either that claim is questionable or there is some seriously sloppy work being done if rifles like mine leave the factory in that state. I don’t understand how they could have cycled 10 rounds and found no issue and yet there are rifles out there with feed issues.
I'm not the kind of guy to pile on without reason. I think AI forgot how to make rifles you could trust in a real world setting. My last AI could not have received any sort of QC whatsoever in the assembly process, and there is ZERO chance anyone fired it.
AI management to the QC department:
AI support team when you let them know "It doesn't look like the QC department had a go with this one:"
My last gun-company fan-boi behavior died...when I get a gun from someone that has some esoteric and hard to measure thing wrong with it I can live with it needing some work . Something like "after a 400 round mag dump the piston gets a little sticky" or "we did a sand test..."
When any idiot could see it was massively fucked up....thats a mark on the chalk board.
AI - I love you but it’s time for couples counseling. I recommend randomly sending a QC guy to Ukraine to fight the Russians with a rifle they signed off on. Maybe once a week or so.
As for the AT-X shim thing - I would be flaming pissed off if I had paid a $3000 “It’s an AI” tax for a rifle system and the company that made the chassis that was fucked up decided to JB weld a hand filed shim in there to “make it right.”.
An AR10 lower costs $100 to manufacture from 7075 billet. Including anodizing. The core part of the AT-X chassis is similar in design feature composition and machine time. AI JB welded a hand filed piece of metal into your $6000 precision rifle to avoid eating $100.