Re: Addiction checkup - How many firearms do you o
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ewoaf</div><div class="ubbcode-body">3 with the 4th on the way and then I'm done.... quality over quantity. </div></div>
I have to partially disagree. If you are only into one type of gun--handguns, rifles, shotguns--the very short list might be appropriate. If you are only interested in one sort of shooting--tactical, race, precision, clays--a few quality guns may cover your bases. I don't claim that I absolutely need every gun I own, but even when you take away the antiques and heirlooms, I've got far more than five of each: rifles, handguns and shotguns. They simply don't do the same things.
A Glock 20 is a great woods gun, but too big for most people to carry all day. A Saiga 12 is a fine fighting or 3-gun shotgun, but nowhere near optimal for sporting clays. An AI in .338 Lapua is a great long-range gun but you wouldn't want to clear a room with it. Based on the practical and recreational uses I have for my guns, I think I can say that I would lose a great deal of utility if I went below twelve guns. I would lose a significant amount of utility if I went below twenty.
The "standard" for a "personal arsenal" as I've seen reproduced in various media is a shotgun, a centerfire rifle, a rimfire rifle and a centerfire hadngun. Each of these performs a function none of the others can. Now, add a .22 pistol for practice, a sporting or HD shotgun (depending on what you started with), a light ("assault") or precision rifle (again, based on what you envisioned being part of your original four), and a compact or full-sized handgun (ibid). That is eight, and I think good arguments can be made for a large-bore revolver, a "trunk" gun and, depending on your social outlook, some redundancy in the collection.
Now, if you have no interest in hunting or shooting clays, cannot carry a handgun or simply are only interested in specific guns, I understand your list being shorter. If the choice is between quality and quantity, I think it is best to strike a balance. No matter how nice your Nighthawk 1911 is, it doesn't arm you and your buddy. Still, owning three Glocks is better than owning ten Hi Points. The middle path is best in the beginning because it gives you breathing room to trade up without postponing skill development.
The point of my rant is that the OP should not feel "excessive" if he sits down to list what he "needs" (or at least has utility for) ten or twelve guns. Five guns works for some people; it doesn't come close to covering my bases.