Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We want to see your skills! Post a video between now and November 1st showing what you've learned from Frank's lessons and 3 people will be selected to win a free shirt. Good luck everyone!
Create a channel Learn moreThis shit is too close to home and the FBI forensic expert makes it sound grotesque….That Motherfucker needs to be chopped up into tiny pieces!
Yeah, with the kids we can't watch much at a time and are just into #2 but it's pretty good and exactly what anyone familiar with that county already knew, but hard to watch how they did that poor girls family.Netflix has a pretty well done documentary on the subject
The remaining family members need to be hammered and brought to the realization of the necessity of the explanation of he deaths of Paul and Maggie….. I truly feel like there’s a TON of information that the family knows about EVERYTHING involving the deaths of Mallory and his wife and son….. EVERYTHING is connected…Netflix has a pretty well done documentary on the subject
Same. The name vaguely rings a bell... but other than that I have no idea who this person is.Never heard of him? I must have been playing outside shooting guns instead of watching the news
Been watching all 6 weeks of this trial. State has no actual direct evidence to prove he did the murders. All they got is circumstantial. All the state has proven is he's a liar, thief, and pill addict. I feel it was a mistake for the defense to let him take the stand, but I guess he kind of had to because the idiot judge has been so fucking permissible and allowing any and all evidence through and he had to explain himself. Defense rested today and the state's rebuttal witnesses start tomorrow morning. If I was on the jury, I would vote not guilty due to the state's lack of evidence.
I'm very worried that's what will happen with at least one juror. I mean, to belive the guy just happened to go inside for the 10 minutes in which the murders were conducted, and the supposed murderer didn't steal anything or go looking for him, or anything is pretty far out there. That doesn't even consider the gun.... Yet still, people want direct evidence to convict a man of killing his wife AND CHILD in cold blood and there isn't any. The fact that the clothes he was wearing in the video also are mysteriously gone is another hard one to ignore though, in light of all other circumstantial evidence.
There is no motive. There was nothing for him to gain if he killed his wife and youngest son. After the pathologist testimony yesterday it came out that there was 2 gunman, not 1. I have always believed that. Alex was not carrying a rifle and shotgun while killing his wife and youngest son. This was a hit squad plain and simple and tried to get the whole family there and only Maggie and Paul showed up. This is all just my theory so don't hold me accountable.
The motive issue has been bothering me. I bet it is bothering some jurors.
The prosecution's theory is that he killed his own wife and son as a distraction technique. That is, bad news about him stealing money was about to come out into the public light, and he hoped that by murdering his own son and wife, he would get sympathy, and the public would not pay as much attention to the fact that he stole money from clients of the law firm . . .
That just seems really weak.
I mean, what if he had just purchased two life insurance policies for his two family members and then kills them? Motive would be simple, right? Collect the life insurance money.
But to kill your own family members to receive public sympathy? That just is not very convincing.
His son was a huge liability to him because of his reckless actions and everything coming to light with all of the special treatment surrounding it and him covering it up. He dies and that all goes away, justice served. His wife was supposedly consulting with a divorce attorney at a time that they were having financial troubles too. Killing her avoids her walking away with half of everything.
Killing them both eliminated two big problems for him. Yes, there was motive. Life insurance policies would just be icing on the cake. I'd be surprised if the wife didn't have a policy.
Questions?
Watched it a bit on Friday. The guy is a snake.
Do the police generally know to the minute what time the murders took place and did Murdaugh have time to clean himself up and dispose of the murder weapons before they arrived? Is the consensus that he did it himself or hired someone(s)?
I'm sure to the cop hating crowd who run to defend any criminal no matter what he looks like a great guy. The one thing that never registers with the this group is who had a reason to kill them. No one just wanders onto private property and kills members of a well connected, rich, powerful family. A thieving, drug addict who is morally corrupt and running from the sirens is the obvious choice for murderer. I promise you the wife and kid had insurance worth a ton, his divorce was on the near horizon and he was danger close to being exposed for an endless series of crimes decades long.
Killing that drunken kid ends all the investigations and slows the lawsuits for his drunken killing of that girl. Killing his wife saves him from a divorce that exposes his finances and drug habits and also allows him to keep most of his wealth.
The only other possibility is one of the families of the murdered girl or the murdered housekeeper had enough of his bullshit and went after his family for some payback. There is a 100% chance the housekeeper didn't fall down the stairs. The only thing that interests me about the whole thing is that there is some serious wrongdoing linked to that family and no one seems to be investigating any of it.
Bother to check or smoke check?I am wondering how many people his family has fucked out of their lives, property and money over the last 100 years or so. This is just the tip of generations of rat-fucking and bad behavior.
Will anyone even bother to check?
i dont know, there's a lot going on. either this SOB did it, but there's evidence that a second shooter who should've been at the scene. I'm thinking he got tied up with the cartel and they pew pew'd his family and of course he ain't gonna say shit to save his own ass.. hell who knows.
Yeah I wasn't impressed with that at all. Should have hammered the facts they have and how insane any other conclusion is. His guns- fact, he was there - fact, a 10 min window of time- fact, the clothes he was wearing are gone- fact, the guns are missing - fact, He made them both come home that night- fact, zero evidence of anyone else being there- fact, he took 800 steps during that 10 min time window - fact,Closing arguments are lacking and SAD……
I use to lease some hunting land very close to where the killings took place. I don’t know why, but I always got a uneasy vibe from the whole area. It’s a very strange small town with a big city “your not from here fuck you vibe”