-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
Alex Murdaugh The POS in question of SC murder trial
- Thread starter Necessary 3vil
- Start date
That Motherfucker needs to be chopped up into tiny pieces! Not because of killing his peice of shit son. But because of all the cover ups of other murders and thinking he’s powerful! Fuck him and his family!
This shit is too close to home and the FBI forensic expert makes it sound grotesque….
Yeah I'm all too familiar with Hampton Co SC. Obviously the guy did it and is a total pos , theif , and drug dealer, ect.... I'm worried the state hasn't proven their case though. They have tons of circumstantial evidence and everyone knows he did it, but it only takes 1 juror and there isn't any direct evidence that ties him to the murders. No telling how many bodies are attaches to that man.
Yeah, with the kids we can't watch much at a time and are just into #2 but it's pretty good and exactly what anyone familiar with that county already knew, but hard to watch how they did that poor girls family.
D
Deleted member 204596
Guest
Yes, Netflix says it perfectly. If he didn’t do it himself, he paid someone to do it. He is a shady person. I have dealt with many SC attorneys personally and I can’t believe it.
The remaining family members need to be hammered and brought to the realization of the necessity of the explanation of he deaths of Paul and Maggie….. I truly feel like there’s a TON of information that the family knows about EVERYTHING involving the deaths of Mallory and his wife and son….. EVERYTHING is connected…
Never heard of him? I must have been playing outside shooting guns instead of watching the news
Fucking gingers......its always the gingers...
I am wondering how many people his family has fucked out of their lives, property and money over the last 100 years or so. This is just the tip of generations of rat-fucking and bad behavior.
Will anyone even bother to check?
Will anyone even bother to check?
Been watching all 6 weeks of this trial. State has no actual direct evidence to prove he did the murders. All they got is circumstantial. All the state has proven is he's a liar, thief, and pill addict. I feel it was a mistake for the defense to let him take the stand, but I guess he kind of had to because the idiot judge has been so fucking permissible and allowing any and all evidence through and he had to explain himself. Defense rested today and the state's rebuttal witnesses start tomorrow morning. If I was on the jury, I would vote not guilty due to the state's lack of evidence.
Same. The name vaguely rings a bell... but other than that I have no idea who this person is.
As far as the state fucking up the trial... I would expect nothing less. I served on a jury 8 or 9 years ago. What the state tried to pass off as evidence was a fucking joke.
Mike
I'm very worried that's what will happen with at least one juror. I mean, to belive the guy just happened to go inside for the 10 minutes in which the murders were conducted, and the supposed murderer didn't steal anything or go looking for him, or anything is pretty far out there. That doesn't even consider the gun.... Yet still, people want direct evidence to convict a man of killing his wife AND CHILD in cold blood and there isn't any. The fact that the clothes he was wearing in the video also are mysteriously gone is another hard one to ignore though, in light of all other circumstantial evidence.
There is no motive. There was nothing for him to gain if he killed his wife and youngest son. After the pathologist testimony yesterday it came out that there was 2 gunman, not 1. I have always believed that. Alex was not carrying a rifle and shotgun while killing his wife and youngest son. This was a hit squad plain and simple and tried to get the whole family there and only Maggie and Paul showed up. This is all just my theory so don't hold me accountable.
Three things I wouldnt trust....
1. Alex Murdaugh.
2. Anything the media reports on the case.
3. Any law official working the case. Prosecutor, Sherrif, FBI, etc.
1. Alex Murdaugh.
2. Anything the media reports on the case.
3. Any law official working the case. Prosecutor, Sherrif, FBI, etc.
There is no motive. There was nothing for him to gain if he killed his wife and youngest son. After the pathologist testimony yesterday it came out that there was 2 gunman, not 1. I have always believed that. Alex was not carrying a rifle and shotgun while killing his wife and youngest son. This was a hit squad plain and simple and tried to get the whole family there and only Maggie and Paul showed up. This is all just my theory so don't hold me accountable.
Two guns or two shooters? I didn't think that 2 shooters had been established???
The motive issue has been bothering me. I bet it is bothering some jurors.
The prosecution's theory is that he killed his own wife and son as a distraction technique. That is, bad news about him stealing money was about to come out into the public light, and he hoped that by murdering his own son and wife, he would get sympathy, and the public would not pay as much attention to the fact that he stole money from clients of the law firm . . .
That just seems really weak.
I mean, what if he had just purchased two life insurance policies for his two family members and then kills them? Motive would be simple, right? Collect the life insurance money.
But to kill your own family members to receive public sympathy? That just is not very convincing.
The prosecution's theory is that he killed his own wife and son as a distraction technique. That is, bad news about him stealing money was about to come out into the public light, and he hoped that by murdering his own son and wife, he would get sympathy, and the public would not pay as much attention to the fact that he stole money from clients of the law firm . . .
That just seems really weak.
I mean, what if he had just purchased two life insurance policies for his two family members and then kills them? Motive would be simple, right? Collect the life insurance money.
But to kill your own family members to receive public sympathy? That just is not very convincing.
Two guns doesn't prove it was two shooters. It's not hard to carry a 300BLK AR-15 and a 12ga and alternate between both. It's not a bad idea to throw people off and make it look like a hit with two shooters though.
His son was a huge liability to him because of his reckless actions and everything coming to light with all of the special treatment surrounding it and him covering it up. He dies and that all goes away, justice served. His wife was supposedly consulting with a divorce attorney at a time that they were having financial troubles too. Killing her avoids her walking away with half of everything.
Killing them both eliminated two big problems for him. Yes, there was motive. Life insurance policies would just be icing on the cake. I'd be surprised if the wife didn't have a policy.
I thought there was life insurance on the wife too?
Also, that stunt with his drug dealer in the "attempted suicide " was very very likely just his attempt to have a fall guy for the 2 murders.
Questions?
Watched it a bit on Friday. The guy is a snake.
Do the police generally know to the minute what time the murders took place and did Murdaugh have time to clean himself up and dispose of the murder weapons before they arrived? Is the consensus that he did it himself or hired someone(s)?
Watched it a bit on Friday. The guy is a snake.
Do the police generally know to the minute what time the murders took place and did Murdaugh have time to clean himself up and dispose of the murder weapons before they arrived? Is the consensus that he did it himself or hired someone(s)?
I think the consensus is he did it. Yes he had time and all the weirdness with what his vehicle did in his "trip to his parents " makes it look like that's exactly what he was doing. Also couldn't find the clothes he had on 10 minutes before the murders
i dont know, there's a lot going on. either this SOB did it, but there's evidence that a second shooter who should've been at the scene. I'm thinking he got tied up with the cartel and they pew pew'd his family and of course he ain't gonna say shit to save his own ass.. hell who knows.
I'm sure to the cop hating crowd who run to defend any criminal no matter what he looks like a great guy. The one thing that never registers with the this group is who had a reason to kill them. No one just wanders onto private property and kills members of a well connected, rich, powerful family. A thieving, drug addict who is morally corrupt and running from the sirens is the obvious choice for murderer. I promise you the wife and kid had insurance worth a ton, his divorce was on the near horizon and he was danger close to being exposed for an endless series of crimes decades long.
Killing that drunken kid ends all the investigations and slows the lawsuits for his drunken killing of that girl. Killing his wife saves him from a divorce that exposes his finances and drug habits and also allows him to keep most of his wealth.
The only other possibility is one of the families of the murdered girl or the murdered housekeeper had enough of his bullshit and went after his family for some payback. There is a 100% chance the housekeeper didn't fall down the stairs. The only thing that interests me about the whole thing is that there is some serious wrongdoing linked to that family and no one seems to be investigating any of it.
Killing that drunken kid ends all the investigations and slows the lawsuits for his drunken killing of that girl. Killing his wife saves him from a divorce that exposes his finances and drug habits and also allows him to keep most of his wealth.
The only other possibility is one of the families of the murdered girl or the murdered housekeeper had enough of his bullshit and went after his family for some payback. There is a 100% chance the housekeeper didn't fall down the stairs. The only thing that interests me about the whole thing is that there is some serious wrongdoing linked to that family and no one seems to be investigating any of it.
This is the wrong thread for this but it amaizes me that you equate how people feel about a cop beating and/or killing someone for nonviolent offenses or just because they can, to how people feel about this pos as if it's all the same thing. By the way, this whole murdaugh mess is just another example of bad cops. These people got away with countless crimes and they did so by the cops not doing what they were supposed to. If only the murdaugh bunch had been poor, then a cop would have killed one or more of them a long time ago.....
The obvious answer has already been provided by the defense experts....there was two shooters.....Alex and another person.
That would be a reasonable theory but they would have had to go inside and get the two guns, then go do it.... they have proved it was his guns they just don't have em
I thought there was a $4.3 million dollar life insurance on the wife 30 days before their murders. Edit: Turns out that was bullshit.
Two guns. Yes. Most assume both were killed at the same time. Could have shot one, then another later.
Not sure if he’ll be convicted but (according to the Netflix show) the family has been treated as basically untouchable by the local authorities has me suspicious.
Two guns. Yes. Most assume both were killed at the same time. Could have shot one, then another later.
Not sure if he’ll be convicted but (according to the Netflix show) the family has been treated as basically untouchable by the local authorities has me suspicious.
Last edited:
Looking more and more likely the local PD came to kill him but couldn’t find him so killed his family instead.
PD returns, charges Alex for the murders.
PD returns, charges Alex for the murders.
Lawyer criminals plan ahead. Using two guns would have been a good way develop evidence that it was two shooters, and not Alex himself. The poor housekeeper, trip and fall, death, no autopsy, death certificate stating died of natural causes.
I have to say he is one of those 50/50 environmentalist, used buckshot to the chess but used steel shot to de-brain his son so that should count for something. Electronics was his downfall but they stated that a jury in that county would never convict that POS since the family is so powerful for over 100 years. Hard to believe that he would do them so bad over money and drugs.
I just learned Murdaughr is a Democrap from a long line of Democraps. The state attorney general himself showed up yesterday because their prosecution is in trouble. There’s way more to this story than we’re being told.
Holy fuckballs the state's closing is terrible! Darrell Brooks could've done a better job!
Com'on man you don't believe 5'-2" midgets showed up and used family weapons to kill his wife and son, unless Murdaugh called them right after he called his wife and son to come home right away since they had other plans that night. But as our justice system works its possible that the burger king killed them the defense would argue , possible its possible . The defense is just there to sow doubt and nothing more. You take the facts and twist them in the way you ask questions. Like you come home from work and the wife has a load across her face and a dude runs out of the house. Defense attorney would say " You have to agree with me that its possible its just mayonnaise from the BLT sandwich that the deli guy just dropped off " and you know full well its not mayonnaise but he's sowing doubt.......
Yeah I wasn't impressed with that at all. Should have hammered the facts they have and how insane any other conclusion is. His guns- fact, he was there - fact, a 10 min window of time- fact, the clothes he was wearing are gone- fact, the guns are missing - fact, He made them both come home that night- fact, zero evidence of anyone else being there- fact, he took 800 steps during that 10 min time window - fact,
I mean, they don't have direct evidence but they do have a ton of circumstantial evidence and thats what the prosecutor should have closed with instead of the rambling diatribe.
Judge is currently reading the jury instructions. This was such a great trial to watch and am disappointed it's about to end.
I'm not sure what the verdict will be. I believe he did it, but I don't believe the state proved it beyond a reasonable doubt. I didn't get to watch that much of it so there could be other factors that would change that. Only takes 1 juror to hang it
I use to lease some hunting land very close to where the killings took place. I don’t know why, but I always got a uneasy vibe from the whole area. It’s a very strange small town with a big city “your not from here fuck you vibe”
Of and don’t forget about the poor gay kid that Buster may have had a hand in him meeting his maker early!
Of and don’t forget about the poor gay kid that Buster may have had a hand in him meeting his maker early!
I've gotten that vibe a few times before when I would be down hunting in TX in some pretty backwoods areas especially when it's noted that I'm from CA.
