Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below! Subscribers get more entries, check out the plans below for a better chance of winning!
Join the contest SubscribeRecently thought about this and think green would be better in environments near human influence. A lot more light sources at the warm end of the spectrum.Any idea when the Trijicon is going to be released for the general public?
And which color reticle do y'all think is the better of the two for 24/7 shooting?
Any idea when the Trijicon is going to be released for the general public?
And which color reticle do y'all think is the better of the two for 24/7 shooting?
Nice rifles! How do you like the reticle on Trijicon and how does it compare to the HDII reticle (if you have the EBR-2C)? Which one do you prefer?So I've had my 4.5-30 FFP Mil flavor for a couple weeks now and I'm a big fan. Obviously everyone is going to compare this to the Vortex HD II 4.5-27. Having these set up on near identical rifles I believe the Trijicon is optically slightly better than the Vortex. To my eye, it's a more clear image and more forgiving to head position on awkward barricades. I like the turrets, clicks are crisp on both elevation and windage. My scope tracks accurately. I'm not a pro by any means, but I have spun the knobs a decent amount at the range, matches and in dry fire.
I think at the price point Trijicon the 4.5-30 may become the new most popular optic on the PRS series. I'm very, very pleased with mine!
View attachment 6942772
I like both but to be fair the reticles are more or less the same in the Trijicon and the EBR-2C. Whether you prefer the open circle or the floating dot is a preference. The floating dot is quite small and does not obscure any target I have shot at yet. They both have the same wind holds (0.5 mil) along the center line. I'd prefer alternating 0.2 mil in both. Most of the other check boxes like useful reticle, accurate turret tracking, good turret feel, magnification range and weight are similar. The significant differences really are in the glass and specifically the clarity of the image and the more forgiving "eye box."Nice rifles! How do you like the reticle on Trijicon and how does it compare to the HDII reticle (if you have the EBR-2C)? Which one do you prefer?
Thanks. I like the floating dot reticles and currently have MR4. I would like to see the Trijicon ffp w/mil reticle live or at least see a picture of the actual reticle before I buy it.I like both but to be fair the reticles are more or less the same in the Trijicon and the EBR-2C. Whether you prefer the open circle or the floating dot is a preference. The floating dot is quite small and does not obscure any target I have shot at yet. They both have the same wind holds (0.5 mil) along the center line. I'd prefer alternating 0.2 mil in both. Most of the other check boxes like useful reticle, accurate turret tracking, good turret feel, magnification range and weight are similar. The significant differences really are in the glass and specifically the clarity of the image and the more forgiving "eye box."
Apologies but I have not looked through or used a Bushnell XRS II.
Thanks. I like the floating dot reticles and currently have MR4. I would like to see the Trijicon ffp w/mil reticle live or at least see a picture of the actual reticle before I buy it.
Awesome! Thanks. Can you let me know which pic is on x30?Crappy photos but, it is about the best I can get with an iphone jammed up the scope. The reticle is very crisp and the glass very clear. I can see the feathers on small sparrows on a cell phone tower over 1/2 mile from my house.
Awesome! Thanks. Can you let me know which pic is on x30?
I'm interested in how this compares to the Bushy XRS II moreso than the Vortex HDII. Same mag range at roughly the same length, weight, tube but with different objectives. Any thoughts?
.. the windage knob is not as crisp as the elevation....
Same here with the windage turret. It got better but still not the same as elev turret. . I think some of it has to do with the fact that it's smaller than the elev turret, but i just zeroed it put the cap back on and haven't touched it since. Other than that I'm really loving this scope so far.
PST gen 1? Yeah if the Trijicon didn't have better glass than he PST Gen 1 I would've returned it the same day.
@Sainte70 besides the canted reticle. How did the glass look? Do you have anything else to compare it to?
Mounted my scope and I just could not seem to get the cross hairs to level. I went to our range master, a retired Army Sniper today. We used two different level sets and could not get them to level. We finally determined that the reticle is slanting down to the left,
When I got home, I dismounted the scope and sat the flat part of the main body on top of a level. Once completely level, I then placed a level on top of the elevation turret and leveled that. When I looked thru the scope, the cross hairs were definitely leaning to the left....and not by a little!
When I leveled the crosshairs by eye, the level was bubble up all the way to one end.
Since I bought the scope back in June, I now have to return it to Trijicon...oh well. They have been good to me in the past, hope they remain so now. I have no reason to believe they won't continue with their excellent customer service.
I am VERY disappointed in this scope's failure because I bought it based 100% on Trijicon reputation and my experience with them.
No excuse for canted reticles. How can any QA/QC process not involve orienting the scope vertically against a grid and checking to see if it is in spec?
I called Trijicon And they immediately sent me a return authorization number which stated it may be 2 to 4 week turnaround. I still trust their company as I’ve had many good experiences with them in the past and they have always treated me right
It happens all the time with quite a few brands. Leupold Mark 4 line used to be famous for it, but I have seen it with many other bands as well.