Based on clicking through the links on their site, yes.The actions in the current run of BAs for Black Friday are Nuke 2.0s with the integral lugs correct?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Based on clicking through the links on their site, yes.The actions in the current run of BAs for Black Friday are Nuke 2.0s with the integral lugs correct?
Mine definitely wants to bind more while upside down.Ok all you fellow Arch action owners. I have a small test for you. Turn the rifle upside down (magwell up) and slowly cycle the action a few times. report back anything abnormal.
Feels like it's binding...but so does my Origin and Howa. Funny enough my Savages still run. What is your point?Ok all you fellow Arch action owners. I have a small test for you. Turn the rifle upside down (magwell up) and slowly cycle the action a few times. report back anything abnormal.
no point. just found it strange and couldnt figure out what it was. wondering if it was me or if it happens to everyone.Feels like it's binding...but so does my Origin and Howa. Funny enough my Savages still run. What is your point?
Ok all you fellow Arch action owners. I have a small test for you. Turn the rifle upside down or ejection port down and slowly cycle the action a few times. report back anything abnormal.
Yeah this is going to put a damper on my Annie Oakley action hanging upside down from a horse.
I've never seen American Rifle Company action with a picatinny rail attached like that that's interestingFound one of these for sale locally. I'm pretty surprised they aren't more popular. But I guess they aren't for everyone either. View attachment 8014623
It's for the Mausingfields. They also make direct mount rings.I've never seen American Rifle Company action with a picatinny rail attached like that that's interesting
How many times has impact changed in the 5+ years its been out?2 upgrades meaning OG Nuke, 1.1, 2.0
Well it's pretty much a Defiance Deviant/Surgeon with small tweaks. Soooo not much there left to change if you're not trying to be original or innovative.How many times has impact changed in the 5+ years its been out?
Exactly you have proved my next point. Its a product improved surgeon which is like a 15 year old design. Its simple and is the MOST reliable action.Well it's pretty much a Defiance Deviant/Surgeon with small tweaks. Soooo not much there left to change if you're not trying to be original or innovative.
This is why their shit fails under hard use.
I don't have an ARC action yet, but I appreciate the effort in trying to make improvements. The only way real improvements are made is if people are out there trying new things.Exactly you have proved my next point. Its a product improved surgeon which is like a 15 year old design. Its simple and is the MOST reliable action.
ARC from an engineering and design perspective is very cool. You can tell Ted is a great engineer and has an amazing mind. But he is not a shooter first and you can see how everything is over engineered and complicated for the sake of it. This is why their shit fails under hard use. There are too many things to go wrong trying to win engineer of the year instead of focusing on building the best rifle and accessories for shooters.
They are Hipster guns. Mostly ran by people who don't shoot much. Its rare to see their guns at matches and its never a guy placing in the top 10 running them. The fact that he uses criterion barrels instead of a premium cut rifle tells you he is marked to amateurs and not serious shooters.
Impact doesn't need to constantly update because they already achieved perfection years ago. Go look at the guys burning up a bunch of barrels a year and look at what they are shooting. Its not ARC actions.
Its not an improvement. Its actually a net negative. You end up with a less reliable gun.I don't have an ARC action yet, but I appreciate the effort in trying to make improvements. The only way real improvements are made is if people are out there trying new things.
As far as them not winning lots of matches you can easily say the same thing about AIs and there are farrrrr more of them out there than ARCs.
Impacts are far from perfect which makes me question your match experience. I personally know of more than a few firing pin issues and breakages. Doesn't mean they aren't good actions but no action is perfect.
Thats not really accurate. There may be 1 defiance or impact 100% cert and maybe 1 or 2 50% off certs at the big national 2 day matches. Combine NRL hunter and PRS thats like 40 matches total.To the best of my knowledge, ARC does not give product away to gain market share. He (Ted) has stated this on a podcast I heard awhile back. It appears the other players - defiance, impact, etc. give product or sponsor to get their product out there. I have a few ARC actions and other ARC products and they are top notch. Not just another R700 clone. If you want a clone, just get a Mack Bro.
And yet they just run and run on run. People who complain about cock on close that you don't even notice when running the bolt are just looking for shit to bitch about for the sake of it. Or they don't shoot and rub their bolt like their daddys cock in their basements nice and sensual like.If Impact were perfect they’d have figured out their ignition timing by now instead of having that bit of cock on close with the most popular triggers on the market.
Sounded like the voice of experience on that sensual part , creepy little fella .And yet they just run and run on run. People who complain about cock on close that you don't even notice when running the bolt are just looking for shit to bitch about for the sake of it. Or they don't shoot and rub their bolt like their daddys cock in their basements nice and sensual like.
Leupold is proof that sponsoring top shooters and marketing works and that you don't need the best product to win matches. Actions are no different in that way.Thats not really accurate. There may be 1 defiance or impact 100% cert and maybe 1 or 2 50% off certs at the big national 2 day matches. Combine NRL hunter and PRS thats like 40 matches total.
The top shooters are shooting what they are sponsored to shoot or what works best. There is a reason certain certs sell for a premium and others you can barely give away. The demand is either there or its not.
Ted is cheap that is why he doesn't give anything away. Just about every other manufacture donates shit to the tables. This is called supporting the shooting community. Anyone who has had to deal with ARC customer service, which is dogshit by the way, know its like pulling teeth to get them to replace defective product. Again, because they are cheap.
Mack Bros? GTFO. You probally buy your shoes at walmart too.
Only poor people and sponsered shooters run Leopold. People who can afford whatever they want tend to run something else, just like they run impacts.Leupold is proof that sponsoring top shooters and marketing works and that you don't need the best product to win matches. Actions are no different in that way.
The fact that you equate Mack Bros to Wal-Mart shows your complete lack of knowledge/ignorance.
Exactly you have proved my next point. Its a product improved surgeon which is like a 15 year old design. Its simple and is the MOST reliable action.
ARC from an engineering and design perspective is very cool. You can tell Ted is a great engineer and has an amazing mind. But he is not a shooter first and you can see how everything is over engineered and complicated for the sake of it. This is why their shit fails under hard use. There are too many things to go wrong trying to win engineer of the year instead of focusing on building the best rifle and accessories for shooters.
They are Hipster guns. Mostly ran by people who don't shoot much. Its rare to see their guns at matches and its
Hmmm… I run impacts… ARCs, S&B and leupold….. guess I’m a confused poor.Only poor people and sponsered shooters run Leopold. People who can afford whatever they want tend to run something else, just like they run impacts.
Its not an improvement. Its actually a net negative. You end up with a less reliable gun.
AI didn't make rifles that are conductive to PRS type shooting until they released the AT-X this year and time will tell if they stick. Based on what I have seen over the years, Impacts go down way less than AI's as well. AI's like to break small parts, deadlining the gun.
The only issue i have seen was Blam breaking firing pins at a match trying to shoot 22GT. @Birddog6424 could probably explain what the issue was. Every single other person I know who runs them, swears by them.
Like 50% of PRS shooters are running an Impact, which is nuts when you have other big manufactures like Definace, Lone Peak, Terminus, Curtis and Bighorn to compete with.View attachment 8014745
Only poor people and sponsered shooters run Leopold. People who can afford whatever they want tend to run something else, just like they run impacts.
Almost like they made that action for nearly two decades before with a different label on the side…A lot of dick beating over another R700 clone.
Push feed, 50/50 cocking, r700 footprint - can't believe no one thought of that magic combo before Impact![]()
Thats not really accurate. There may be 1 defiance or impact 100% cert and maybe 1 or 2 50% off certs at the big national 2 day matches. Combine NRL hunter and PRS thats like 40 matches total.
The top shooters are shooting what they are sponsored to shoot or what works best. There is a reason certain certs sell for a premium and others you can barely give away. The demand is either there or its not.
Ted is cheap that is why he doesn't give anything away. Just about every other manufacture donates shit to the tables. This is called supporting the shooting community. Anyone who has had to deal with ARC customer service, which is dogshit by the way, know its like pulling teeth to get them to replace defective product. Again, because they are cheap.
Mack Bros? GTFO. You probally buy your shoes at walmart too.
Ask Mark Gordon at SAC about how perfect Impacts are.Exactly you have proved my next point. Its a product improved surgeon which is like a 15 year old design. Its simple and is the MOST reliable action.
ARC from an engineering and design perspective is very cool. You can tell Ted is a great engineer and has an amazing mind. But he is not a shooter first and you can see how everything is over engineered and complicated for the sake of it. This is why their shit fails under hard use. There are too many things to go wrong trying to win engineer of the year instead of focusing on building the best rifle and accessories for shooters.
They are Hipster guns. Mostly ran by people who don't shoot much. Its rare to see their guns at matches and its never a guy placing in the top 10 running them. The fact that he uses criterion barrels instead of a premium cut rifle tells you he is marked to amateurs and not serious shooters.
Impact doesn't need to constantly update because they already achieved perfection years ago. Go look at the guys burning up a bunch of barrels a year and look at what they are shooting. Its not ARC actions.
theres one for sale in the PX for $950I'm thinking about getting an Archimedes. Based upon comments people have received from ARC about this action, does anyone know if they might be doing another revision to change the bolt stop?
Post Exchange. Got it. Yeah I saw that one, it's short action though, I'm looking for long action magnum.theres one for sale in the PX for $950
Bolt stop is fine on both of mine and my friends. Once you figure out the seeet spot it couldn’t be easier. I’ve never understood what all the gripe is about. Is it as easy as just depressing a button? No it’s not but hard to do it definitely is not.I'm thinking about getting an Archimedes. Based upon comments people have received from ARC about this action, does anyone know if they might be doing another revision to change the bolt stop?
I'm thinking about getting an Archimedes. Based upon comments people have received from ARC about this action, does anyone know if they might be doing another revision to change the bolt stop?
Lol if you spent less time troll posting and being a gear queer you might find your way out of midpack.Only poor people and sponsered shooters run Leopold. People who can afford whatever they want tend to run something else, just like they run impacts.
Struggling to decide between a Nuke and Origin. Had an Origin a couple years ago but sold it to help cover my mother-in-laws funeral cost. I wanted to enjoy it but bolt lift was heavier than I expected and it didn't run as smooth as my RPR which has been micro-slicked. I had a TT Special in it but didn't make sure it was timed. Honestly don't know how to. Also had a tendency to bind if I didn't run it right. (Yeah, I know. Learn how to run a bolt!) My issue is that I have to intentionally cant my RPR bolt to get it to bind. It just seemed more intuitive/fluid and less finicky. I'm in a place to start another build and the analysis paralysis is kicking in. Lol. I'm also BAD at being brand loyal even though I was mildly disappointed. I just don't know what to expect from a custom action.
You'll struggle to try and bind a Nucleus.Struggling to decide between a Nuke and Origin. Had an Origin a couple years ago but sold it to help cover my mother-in-laws funeral cost. I wanted to enjoy it but bolt lift was heavier than I expected and it didn't run as smooth as my RPR which has been micro-slicked. I had a TT Special in it but didn't make sure it was timed. Honestly don't know how to. Also had a tendency to bind if I didn't run it right. (Yeah, I know. Learn how to run a bolt!) My issue is that I have to intentionally cant my RPR bolt to get it to bind. It just seemed more intuitive/fluid and less finicky. I'm in a place to start another build and the analysis paralysis is kicking in. Lol. I'm also BAD at being brand loyal even though I was mildly disappointed. I just don't know what to expect from a custom action.