About the only argument I can make against it is that it might cause a violent rearward travel once the case lets loose
Ah yes, it will come to be known as the “Archimedes black eye”. ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
About the only argument I can make against it is that it might cause a violent rearward travel once the case lets loose
@Jon_ARC
Is the website accurate regarding the Mausingfield changes?
[*]$1600
[*]Pin-less interchangeable scope rail secured by five conical-head, Torx-drive screws.
[*]Pin-less recoil lug is clocked by the scope rail.
[*]Salt-bath nitride finish improves corrosion resistance and reduces friction.
Not trying to sound like an ass, but I will: you obviously have no idea what you're talking about, so it'd be best if you just didn't post about it. People have handled it now, and unanimously agree it's practically unnoticeable. in fact, due to the design, I can run this action faster than any other I've tried (which is a lot). Ted's logic is right, the human body in a shooting position is more adept to extracting by pulling into the shoulder vs twisting upwards. (and there are spent cases at Ted's booth....)Until you add a fired case in the chamber.
Seems to me that is going to eliminate the ability to “flick” the bolt backwards with the back of your index finger/knuckle when cycling the bolt for a quick follow up shot and instead require that you grasp and pull the bolt backwards for primary extraction.
Sure there might be a super strong lever in the system, but the solution seems likely to be worse than the problem it was trying to fix.
That's not the point of the lever. The point of the lever is that it makes the bolt lift lighter because you're not extracting during the lift. It's not there to give you the ability to extract cases you overpressured the hell out of, though it will do that too.If you are sticking cases in the chamber you have bigger problems than this new action solves.
That's not the point of the lever. The point of the lever is that it makes the bolt lift lighter because you're not extracting during the lift. It's not there to give you the ability to extract cases you overpressured the hell out of, though it will do that too.
The 75 degree bolt throw would ordinarily make the bolt lift heavier than traditional 2-lug actions, but with the removal of the extraction during bolt lift you end up with a bolt lift more comparable to the 2-lug actions while retaining the shorter bolt throw.
That's not the point of the lever. The point of the lever is that it makes the bolt lift lighter because you're not extracting during the lift. It's not there to give you the ability to extract cases you overpressured the hell out of, though it will do that too.
The 75 degree bolt throw would ordinarily make the bolt lift heavier than traditional 2-lug actions, but with the removal of the extraction during bolt lift you end up with a bolt lift more comparable to the 2-lug actions while retaining the shorter bolt throw.
Yup, and also the website says its nitrided (instead of DLC) and the rail no longer uses their lug design. Those were three features that justified the $1600 ($300 over similar actions), so I hope this isn't true. Sounds like they are trying to integrate/simplify manufacturing across three actions with shared parts.
Here's the listed "improvements" on the website. Only thing I'd be interested in is a bolt upgrade with the bayonet and the 83* throw. Otherwise, I'm glad I got my LA Mausenfield last year.
Improvements
And:
- $1600
- Short action weight 2.25 pounds, long action weight 2.5 pounds
- 83-degree bolt rotation improves knob to scope clearance and shortens bolt cycle.
- Bolt-lug guide rail improves anti-binding performance.
- Dual cocking-cams and reduced cocking-cam pitch eases bolt lift.
- Bump-free bolt closure improves the feel of the action when closing the bolt.
- New bolt stop design improves durability and functionality.
- Enlarged ejection port improves manual access.
- Heavier striker improves ignition reliability.
- Rem 700 style mag well accepts AICS style mags and supports BDL and Wyatt bottom metal.
- Pin-less interchangeable scope rail secured by five conical-head, Torx-drive screws.
- Pin-less recoil lug is clocked by the scope rail.
- Machining in the hardened condition improves final form.
- Salt-bath nitride finish improves corrosion resistance and reduces friction.
INTERLOCKING SCOPE MOUNT AND CHOOSING THE INCLINATION ANGLE OF THE RAIL (Obsolete, 2019 major upgrade)
I think people might be talking past one another.
There is something to what Sheldon N said. I'm going to test it the next time out with my Nucleus by removing the extractor and bringing along a cleaning rod. I initially dismissed it, but now I'm genuinely curious how often I'm actually using my primary extraction cam.
- Everyone at SHOT is cycling the action without firing it.
- No one is doubting it cycles quickly empty
- I don't think anyone is doubting that the Archimedes has massive leverage to pull stuck cases
- One assumes Ted has tested it and everything checks out
What's in question is lightly stuck cases, or normal fired cases. You're transferring the primary extraction from the bolt lift to the rearward stroke. So the question is if you'll still be able to run the bolt fast having no primary extraction happen on the lift, and all of it on the rearward stroke.
Nucleus: rotate the bolt up, built in primary extraction--- rearward pull meets no resistance --> quick cycle
Archimedes: rotate the bolt up, no primary extraction--- rearward pull meets primary extraction --> Maybe slight hiccup?
How much resistance is caused by normal pressure fired ammunition.
in fact, due to the design, I can run this action faster than any other I've tried (which is a lot).
I am also kind of curious to see the new MF. One thing sticks out for sure, posted in the notes on the MF page on ARC's website. And I guess it gets into the very grey area of "how bad of a bad explosion does it take to grenade an action", which can be incredibly trivial/random. But I am curious to hear which parts are being nitrided, and depending on what they are, why the change of pace.
An action needs to have a margin of safety to resist the dangerously high loads resulting from misuse. The margin of safety stems from both proper design and proper heat-treatment of the steel from which the action is made. Therefore, the Mausingfield action must never be subjected to temperatures above 400°F (204°C) for any reason, because doing so will significantly weaken it and compromise its safety margin. The Mausingfield must not be subjected to high-temperature surface treatments such as ferritic nitrocarburizing or salt-bath nitriding, because such treatments are conducted at temperatures ranging from 900-1200° F (480-650° C). These treatments are marketed under several trade names, including Nitrotec®, Tufftride®, Tenifer®, QPQ®, and Melonite®. While these finishes might be suitable for some firearms, they are not suitable for the Mausingfield and may not be suitable for other bolt actions either
Watching videos of some of the guys at the King of 2 Miles event beating open their bolt handles, I imagine the extraction benefits would be much more pronounced in that style of competition.I was interested that in the ELR Beyond 1000 section Elr Researcher said ARC was planning on an ELR size action archimedes for .338/ CT cases in 2020 or so.
Watching videos of some of the guys at the King of 2 Miles event beating open their bolt handles, I imagine the extraction benefits would be much more pronounced in that style of competition.
It says "shortly before the order is ready" at that point you are in control, you can pay up or drag your feet until you get passed over.Sorry, i don't know what that even means, Quantify? 1 week? 3? 6? 12? seven years? Which is it? (which is what my post said specifically)
"before the order is ready" is as vague as "before we all reach singularity"
Fucking god.
I'm interested in a long action for a 300 PRC / 300 Norma build. Come on 2020.
If you want the .300 PRC they are currently offering it in a long action with the magnum bolt face to fit that. For the .300 Norma you would need to wait.
I'm aware. I'd like to be able to run both calibers in the same action and the Mausingfield is the only action they currently offer that will accommodate that.
The xylo reminds me of an Olympic style target stock, with the anschutz rail and the customizable wooden grip.
In what respect? The fit and finish was fantastic on the examples at SHOT. Much more refined than other chassis there.i Just don’t get the impression it’s ready for market just yet. It looks like it was thrown together a couple days ago for shot. I think it needs further refinement before more people will take it seriously.
that's how i felt about the james madison too. and just from images as i was not at shot.i Just don’t get the impression it’s ready for market just yet. It looks like it was thrown together a couple days ago for shot. I think it needs further refinement before more people will take it seriously.
Less force. Incredibly fastSo since this is a thread about the archimedes also, was there anyone else that has their hands on it at shot? If so were you able to cycle it with any brass. How was the feel since the extraction happens purely on rear bolt travel. Is it something a guy would be able to just flick the bolt rearward like normal or will it require a modified bolt throw motion to apply more force
It already pretty much has that. 3" of LOP adjustability ( I think its 11"-14").One possible request or “nice to have” is more adjustability out of the xylo, I have kids and kids are short then they grow, it be awesome to be able to have the length of pull down to like 10”, and then out to a full 14” or whatever,
Same for the wooden grip, can it be adjustable back and forth, like the magpul pro chassis, so I can teach a 10 yr old on a gun they fits both of us
There are different chassis that do this, but I’m making a wishlist for ARC
And +1 on a wooden cheek piece
One possible request or “nice to have” is more adjustability out of the xylo, I have kids and kids are short then they grow, it be awesome to be able to have the length of pull down to like 10”, and then out to a full 14” or whatever,
Same for the wooden grip, can it be adjustable back and forth, like the magpul pro chassis, so I can teach a 10 yr old on a gun they fits both of us
There are different chassis that do this, but I’m making a wishlist for ARC
And +1 on a wooden cheek piece
Looking at the website it says the Archimedes is compatable with remington 700 stocks. I'm looking to get a stock ordered now for it. Is there anything that might require any special inletting or will it be a direct drop in with no modification required for a remington 700 stock?
Yea, its going to have its own inlet if you go w/ a stock and want a perfect fit. Functionally a Nuke inlet would work with possibly a little work. The bolt handle angle is different than the Mausingfield and Nuke. For a chassis, it wont be an issueLooking at the website it says the Archimedes is compatable with remington 700 stocks. I'm looking to get a stock ordered now for it. Is there anything that might require any special inletting or will it be a direct drop in with no modification required for a remington 700 stock?
Ditto on the "I have kids". Would love to see a LOP support down to 10-12 up to 15 (even if i have to remove the pad). Also if you make grips out of plastic .. that way i can stipple them (I do this on the MPA and the MDT ACC to get a better purhase). I hate slippery grips (even though people say its better so you dont torque).
The LOP already is designed w/ 3" of adjustment (11-14 is i believe what they said)