I agree it's a stupid case design for anyone that's actually in the field and not giving lens caps is even dumber, it just shows how completely out of touch Sig is.
What happens when you hunt? Dirt, briars, leaves, sticks, etc. get everywhere. Sig's case is a giant mouth to collect that stuff, and worse yet then they don't give you any lens caps on a binocular where the objective lenses are basically flush with the end of the barrels. They have basically zero protection being that close to the housing end and not recessed. All it would need is lens caps, and instead of a "open mouth" a flap that covered the top that could be pulled back and stowed.
That said I was surprised to see that the ocular focus on mine are pretty stiff, so perhaps they've at least fixed that atrocity. The other two things I noticed immediately is how blue/green tinted the right lens is, it's like looking through an RMR, never seen that in any of my higher end ranging binoculars, my guess is for the display. The left side is yellow/orange tinted, when you look through both you don't really notice a tint, so it's probably being used to counter the color shift but that much tint has to be costing light transmission. Also while the range of manual brightness settings has a great range of dim to bright, the "Auto" setting is way too dim in overcast or flat light conditions.
I will give credit to Sig for bringing bluetooth integration to the market at a reasonable price, it's something Leica, Zeiss, and Swarovski should have done 5+ years ago but they've been happy to sit on doing nothing but increasing max range. Also for making a rangefinder that will range under 1 yard (I was able to range 0.9y) and giving decimal yardages. Archery hunters and tournament shooters will greatly appreciate that.