Another incursion by Mexican forces

Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: shooter65</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Consequences. If there are none, behavior does not change..... </div></div>

I agree wholeheartedly.

But I think it's been shown clearly over the last 40 years of the "War on Drugs" that incarceration is not an effective consequence when trying to change behavior. Hell, drugs are as big a problem in jail as they are out of jail. Even <span style="font-style: italic">during</span> their incarceration drugs are being used.

Rehab is the only effective means of controlling drug abuse.

Though I'll take a guess that incarceration isn't the consequence you have in mind.
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: queequeg</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Blow me. </div></div>

Now that is funny.

QQ I still love you, even if we don't see eye to eye on this one.
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Greg Langelius *</div><div class="ubbcode-body">It's not so much that Americans have addictive personalities, it's that America has an addictive personality.

The drug of choice is called entitlements, which are basically a convoluted method used by the Nanny State to redistribute private wealth. Take the private money, call it public money, and give it to those whose votes will be influenced by the 'entitlement'. Tends to disempower and disenfranchise the thinkers in the same process.

Folks Down South of the Border know a good thing when they see it, and Presto, we got us a border that leaks like a sieve. And to top that, we keep taking the true witnesses who know it's for real and shipping 'em back down to spread the word firsthand.

That's not punishment, that's PR.

Here's another form of PR: ("Mama, what happened to Papa after he went to El Norte...? Nobody knows, Nina..") It may not sound very humanitarian, but it might cause some pause before contemplating covering that last mile before the border...

Many of those who go to El Norte do so content in the knowledge that they will be exploited for subpar wages. Maybe some of all those aging public works which are in such dire need of renovation could benefit from convict labor, being paid at the same rates the illegals are so willing to seek. The idea of chain gangs has come and gone. Maybe it's time again. Might be refreshing to drive on by the road gang and not see a single obscenely paid gub'mint guy leaning on a shovel.

For those who want the money but like the Mexican scenery better, there's the drug trade, which fleeces the American populace, and delivers the money to the perps back home.

And as we saw during Vietnam, keeping plentiful drugs in The 'Hood may serve certain public purposes a lot bettern' some folks would like to say.

There's undoubtedly a lot more reasons why problems exist vis-a-vis the border, but for some, these'll do just fine. For some, they constitute perfectly dandy reasons to demotivate against change.

Greg </div></div>

Though I won't argue against the idea that Americans feel entitled to any number of things, I will strongly disagree that drug use has anything to do with feeling entitled.

Drug use is not an exclusively American issue, nor is it a recent phenomena. As long as we have had people, we have found ways to alter our consciousness for any number of reasons and in any number of ways.

The Chinese have been smoking pot for about 5000 years.

Native Americans have been using substances like peyote for thousands of years.

We have had liquor for over 20,000 years (likely discovered by accident when some water seeped into stored honey and sat for a while until it turned into mead).

Altered consciousness is a huge part of the human experience, and has nothing at all to do with entitlements.
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

Good guess....



<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eleaf</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: shooter65</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Consequences. If there are none, behavior does not change..... </div></div>

I agree wholeheartedly.

But I think it's been shown clearly over the last 40 years of the "War on Drugs" that incarceration is not an effective consequence when trying to change behavior. Hell, drugs are as big a problem in jail as they are out of jail. Even <span style="font-style: italic">during</span> their incarceration drugs are being used.

Rehab is the only effective means of controlling drug abuse.

Though I'll take a guess that incarceration isn't the consequence you have in mind. </div></div>
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: shooter65</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Good guess....</div></div>

So I'll allow someone else to state the obvious:

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: "sickbugs"</div><div class="ubbcode-body">i find it funny how some members are all anti communist,anti everything/pro american way (freedom) until they start saying how they would invade/kill all who oppose their will
smile.gif
</div></div>



<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eleaf</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: shooter65</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Consequences. If there are none, behavior does not change..... </div></div>

I agree wholeheartedly.

But I think it's been shown clearly over the last 40 years of the "War on Drugs" that incarceration is not an effective consequence when trying to change behavior. Hell, drugs are as big a problem in jail as they are out of jail. Even <span style="font-style: italic">during</span> their incarceration drugs are being used.

Rehab is the only effective means of controlling drug abuse.

Though I'll take a guess that incarceration isn't the consequence you have in mind. </div></div> [/quote]
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

Doubtful. The prison system needs overhauled also....
The only thing I am "anti" against is stupidity and not achieving results.


The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

Things need to change.....

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eleaf</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: shooter65</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Good guess....</div></div>

So I'll allow someone else to state the obvious:

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: "sickbugs"</div><div class="ubbcode-body">i find it funny how some members are all anti communist,anti everything/pro american way (freedom) until they start saying how they would invade/kill all who oppose their will
smile.gif
</div></div>



<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eleaf</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: shooter65</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Consequences. If there are none, behavior does not change..... </div></div>

I agree wholeheartedly.

But I think it's been shown clearly over the last 40 years of the "War on Drugs" that incarceration is not an effective consequence when trying to change behavior. Hell, drugs are as big a problem in jail as they are out of jail. Even <span style="font-style: italic">during</span> their incarceration drugs are being used.

Rehab is the only effective means of controlling drug abuse.

Though I'll take a guess that incarceration isn't the consequence you have in mind. </div></div> </div></div> [/quote]
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

I'm so sorry. I did not intend to project drug use as an entitlement.

...But to be fair, I think most of us got that part.

If you honestly believe that drug use carries, or should carry, no penalties, then I'm afraid you're never going to be a part of any solution to this very real problem.

Greg
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

The reason prison's don't work is because it has become a housing project. Thanks to liberal progessives that introduced rehilbitation convicts see prison's as a place to become better criminals. The prison system should be allowed to return to what is was made for. Take away all their luxuries and give them a 20lb. sledge hammer and have them turn big boulders into little rocks. Also, have them become self-sustaining, by which I mean they grow their own food, etc! When the prison becomes a system of PUNISHMENT again, you will see a drop in carciration.
Idle hands lead to idle minds.
Sorry some of my spelling is off.
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Ramrod14(winkie)</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The reason prison's don't work is because it has become a housing project. Thanks to liberal progessives that introduced rehilbitation convicts see prison's as a place to become better criminals. The prison system should be allowed to return to what is was made for. Take away all their luxuries and give them a 20lb. sledge hammer and have them turn big boulders into little rocks. Also, have them become self-sustaining, by which I mean they grow their own food, etc! When the prison becomes a system of PUNISHMENT again, you will see a drop in carciration.
Idle hands lead to idle minds.
Sorry some of my spelling is off. </div></div>

Why is everything a "liberal v conservatives" issue in which the conservatives are always right and the liberals always wrong? Is the world so simple that if everyone just went the way of the conservative we'd all be happy, frolicking on green pastures with no crime, poverty or strife? (That's a rhetorical question BTW, as I'm sure that some of you actually believe it). Though some will surely find a way to point the finger at some "liberal" somewhere (and by liberal I mean non-"conservative"), we must remember under whose watch we fell in to this recession. Under whose watch have we gotten engaged in 2 lengthy wars with no end in sight? Under whose watch have abominations like the "Patriot" Act been "thought" up? I don't mean to defend any particular person, action or political system, but simply pointing fingers and continually blaming the "enemy" is about as unhelpful as giving ice to an Eskimo. The biggest problem we have as a nation is our inability to discuss issues anymore: all we do is blame and finger point and insist that "our way" is the only way. And it's bullshit.

We do have a jail problem in this country. There is no question about that. Some might argue that a HUGE portion of the overpopulation/early release problem has everything to do with the fact that over 1/2 of the incarcerated people in the USA are there for drug offenses making it real tough to house those who have committed violent crimes. We tout ourselves as the freest nation in the world, yet have the largest prison population. How does that work out?

Though I agree that we need to get back to basics on what it means to serve time (are prisoners <span style="font-style: italic">really</span> entitled to cable TV?), the bigger problem stems from the fact that most of the people who are in jail shouldn't be there. If we stop insisting on arresting and incarcerating nearly a million pot smokers per year (far more than <span style="font-weight: bold">all violent crimes combined</span>), we will not have the prison population problems we do have, and the need to resort to early release programs in order to keep the population in check will disappear.
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

the U.S. Government acounting office has reported that approx 27% to 30% of prison population is criminal aliens. Not listing specific country of origin in the report. federal cost of incarcerating criminal aliens--Bureau of Prisons (BOP)'s cost to incarcerate criminals and reimbursements to state and local governments under SCAAP--totaled approximately $5.8 billion for calendar years 2001 through 2004. I would think it is slightly more money now.

A reduction in prison overcrowding and early release seems to be a no brainer.
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

With respect to eleaf, I think he makes a legitimate point.

Subjects like this one serve no valid purpose when that get hijacked into Lib-servative bickering sessions.

We all need to get off our respective soap boxes, and deal with the issues on their merits, and not from entrenched and festering political stances.

If others will refrain from this, I promise I will, too...

Somebody needs to make the first move, and I'm willing.

Deal?

Greg
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

To reiterate my own views, as apolitically as I can, as long as illegal immigration has no real penalty, and as long as illegal immigrants are statutorily entitled to rights and privileges at the behest of the American taxpayers and insurance premium payers, there is going to be a very understandably strong resentment for the human policies which determine our border policies.

It is an inequity, pure and simple, and nobody in any position of responsibility seems to be willing to call it for what it is and do anything substantial to alter the balance.

The reasons, political or otherwise, seem to be more about gored oxes than about decency, honesty, rectitude, and compassion.

Mexico is in trouble, seems to be mired in corruption and denial, and people down that way who want to contribute positively are disenfranchised and disempowered at best, and do anything overt at the risk of life, liberty, property, family, and all else they hold dear.

People kicked and screamed when we went into Haiti, Dominica, Panama, and Iraq, but we went. Why, then, is Mexico off limits to the same brand of expedient unilateral action?

It's not like we don't share the problems. These problems MUST be resolved.

We need a stronger border for many reasons. Choose your favorite, but mitigate for the change.

Greg
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Greg Langelius *</div><div class="ubbcode-body">To reiterate my own views, as apolitically as I can, as long as illegal immigration has no real penalty, and as long as illegal immigrants are statutorily entitled to rights and privileges at the behest of the American taxpayers and insurance premium payers, there is going to be a very understandably strong resentment for the human policies which determine our border policies.

It is an inequity, pure and simple, and nobody in any position of responsibility seems to be willing to call it for what it is and do anything substantial to alter the balance.

The reasons, political or otherwise, seem to be more about gored oxes than about decency, honesty, rectitude, and compassion.

Mexico is in trouble, seems to be mired in corruption and denial, and people down that way who want to contribute positively are disenfranchised and disempowered at best, and do anything overt at the risk of life, liberty, property, family, and all else they hold dear.

People kicked and screamed when we went into Haiti, Dominica, Panama, and Iraq, but we went. Why, then, is Mexico off limits to the same brand of expedient unilateral action?

It's not like we don't share the problems. These problems MUST be resolved.

We need a stronger border for many reasons. Choose your favorite, but mitigate for the change.

Greg </div></div>

I suppose we must first question the idea of "illegal" immigration. I'm not sure I know the difference between a so-called illegal immigrant and a legal one other than bureaucratic paperwork. In my experience (I am very likely one of the very few here who is a "white" American-born male who grew up as an overwhelming minority in the USA - I'm originally from Miami, FL), the vast majority of immigrants who come here, legally or not, are here <span style="font-weight: bold">not</span> to exploit the American system and look for handouts where taxpayers flip the bill, but to work and have an opportunity to have a better life, just like our own ancestors did whenever it was that they came over (in my case, in 1719 when my ancestors sailed from England to South Carolina). How do we distinguish legal immigrants from illegal ones? And how might we mitigate that by somehow finding ways to make those who would come over illegally, do so legally? Does paperwork to show one as legal make it better for America? For some it would because it would make them liable taxpayers like the rest of us. For others, it won't matter at all. Immigrants are immigrants no matter what, and for those people this argument doesn't apply.

I think it's safe to assume that whether legal or not, immigrants will come. So long as we have opportunity and a high standard of living and are a beacon to the world people who live in less fortunate circumstances will continue to find ways to get here. Since 9/11 we have made it increasingly difficult to come here (arbitrarily so in many cases). What could be done in short time now takes years (if not longer), and many are arbitrarily turned down. So their choice is to take a risk with a very high reward (life in America), or continue to live in whatever shithole country they came from. That decision is easy.

What is in our best interest as a nation to deal with illegal immigration, given the reality of the situation, is to figure a way to facilitate immigrants over our borders legally and efficiently so that they can come and be part of the infrastructure, not take from it. That is what most immigrants really want anyways (anyone who would disagree with that is simply full of something). If we don't facilitate immigration, they will facilitate it for us. Either we set reasonable rules or have unreasonable ones broken to our detriment. On that there is no alternative.

Walls will not work. Fences will not work. Military forces along the border will not work. Immigrants will still find ways to come, and rightfully so. We are a nation of good will and with good people (mostly). We can't be that <span style="font-style: italic">and</span> an undesirable place to be simultaneously.

I'll leave us with a quote from David Griswold, a highly influential member of the Libertarian Party.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: "David Griswold"</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Crossing an international border to support your family and pursue dreams of a better life is not an inherently criminal act like rape or robbery. If it were, then most of us descend from criminals. As the people of Texas know well, the large majority of illegal immigrants are not bad people. They are people who value family, faith and hard work trying to live within a bad system.

When large numbers of otherwise decent people routinely violate a law, the law itself is probably the problem. To argue that illegal immigration is bad merely because it is illegal avoids the threshold question of whether we should prohibit this kind of immigration in the first place.</div></div>
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

So it's to be, "No deal"...

I'm bailing out of this conversation now, it's got no more to do with the Second Amendment than Scooby Doo does with brain surgery, and lately, Scooby Doo's been making more sense than most of us.

Greg
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

Legal immigrant= Someone who has not only gone through the bureaucratic B.S. but has also shown the ability to support him or herself and passed a citizenship test as well as all necessary inoculations and tests for deadly communicable diseases such as T.B.

Illegal= someone who will do none of the above no matter what country they come from including our friends to the north Canada.
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: The Mechanic</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Legal immigrant= Someone who has not only gone through the bureaucratic B.S. but has also shown the ability to support him or herself and passed a citizenship test as well as all necessary inoculations and tests for deadly communicable diseases such as T.B.

Illegal= someone who will do none of the above no matter what country they come from including our friends to the north Canada. </div></div>

Fair point. But how can one become legal if one must have citizenship first? It doesn't work that way. In fact one must be here for several years (I forget the exact number but either 7 or 10 rings a bell) before one can even apply for citizenship.

Inoculations? Fine. Support oneself? Fine. I think most immigrants, illegal or not, would qualify with those pretty quickly. How can we get the vast majority of those who want to come and contribute meaningfully to our society and help make it better in the door so that they actually <span style="font-style: italic">can</span> have the opportunity to contribute blah blah blah. That's the problem.
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: The Mechanic</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Legal immigrant= Someone who has not only gone through the bureaucratic B.S. but has also shown the ability to support him or herself and passed a citizenship test as well as all necessary inoculations and tests for deadly communicable diseases such as T.B.

Illegal= someone who will do none of the above no matter what country they come from including our friends to the north Canada. </div></div>

Yes, but it is more insidious than that. Those admitted are not done so according to OUR needs as a nation. Those plainly justifying admission are delayed. Those with no freakin' business here are admitted. Once admitted, you can be subsidized if you fail. We used to have quoatas intended to preserve our nation's culture too, but those have been specifically reversed to dillute it.

In high unemployment, work visas should be suspended, period. No first generation immigrant should be eligible for any benefit, of any kind, at any point. You float, starve, or get a ticket home (which you already paid for as part of your entrance fee). We want the cream of the crop from other countries. We don't want the sludge, or even the pretty goods. We will naturally produce our own flavor of that.

You cannot, as a nation, import poverty and expect living standards to rise. It is mathematically incorrect. Likewise, as Greg L. pointed out, you simply cannot have both open flow of bodies and open flow of monies. You will immediately have every hand in need of a pot looking to get into yours. We have a very, very nice pot and quite enough hands. In addition to having no penalty to immigrate illegally, we have no incentive to do it legally, unless you are a 6 figure earner.

Do my kids have more claim at the American buffet than others? Hell yes, because I am paying for it, as did my parents before me.
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eleaf</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Fair point. But how can one become legal if one must have citizenship first? It doesn't work that way. In fact one must be here for several years (I forget the exact number but either 7 or 10 rings a bell) before one can even apply for citizenship.
</div></div>
We have had amnesty periods before. Anyone left or new can pound sand, thanks. You go back home, and you apply to come back.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eleaf</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I think most immigrants, illegal or not, would qualify with those pretty quickly. How can we get the vast majority of those who want to come and contribute meaningfully to our society and help make it better in the door so that they actually <span style="font-style: italic">can</span> have the opportunity to contribute blah blah blah. That's the problem. </div></div>

Easy, by kicking out the illegal CONSUMING POPULATION, and replacing it with the PRODUCING POPULATION you speak of.

BTW, "supporting yourself" is not coming here and painting at 50% market rates because you, having grown up in a shithole, are willing to live in a rented house or apartment at 2x,3x,and 5x capacity. That forces our domestic population to become unemployed, or lowers their living standards(AKA as our rich get richer, the poor get poorer). Again, you cannot import poverty, ever. It is not in your best interest to adopt dregs unless every other domestic worker is already in a productive, employed state, and you have work that if done, would generate more revenue while not displacing any other required work.
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eleaf</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: The Mechanic</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Legal immigrant= Someone who has not only gone through the bureaucratic B.S. but has also shown the ability to support him or herself and passed a citizenship test as well as all necessary inoculations and tests for deadly communicable diseases such as T.B.

Illegal= someone who will do none of the above no matter what country they come from including our friends to the north Canada. </div></div>

Inoculations? Fine. Support oneself? Fine. I think most immigrants, illegal or not, would qualify with those pretty quickly. How can we get the vast majority of those who want to come and contribute meaningfully to our society and help make it better in the door so that they actually <span style="font-style: italic">can</span> have the opportunity to contribute blah blah blah. That's the problem.</div></div>

All I would say to that and I am not trying to be smart ass but you don't live in Southern Kalifornia. The fraud that takes place here is EPIC. A new fraud that has just been discovered here recently is (insert country of origin) comes into the U.S. and gets on medi-cal, section 8 housing, food stamps, welfare assistance, etc. easily equaling $2000 a month is some instances. This is all deposited into a bank account (even food stamps is a credit card or direct deposit. Then they just leave the country as the bank account keeps getting deposits and additional money from renting out the section 8 home. When the account has a good amount of money in it they come back for vacation with a butt load a cash in the account. The only time there is any form of accounting is to send in monthly forms that usually have one or two people fill out for multiple people. This currently is rampant. Many times the anti-illegal sentiment is founded in seeing the fraud that really pisses the masses off that are really struggling.
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: The Mechanic</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eleaf</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: The Mechanic</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Legal immigrant= Someone who has not only gone through the bureaucratic B.S. but has also shown the ability to support him or herself and passed a citizenship test as well as all necessary inoculations and tests for deadly communicable diseases such as T.B.

Illegal= someone who will do none of the above no matter what country they come from including our friends to the north Canada. </div></div>

Inoculations? Fine. Support oneself? Fine. I think most immigrants, illegal or not, would qualify with those pretty quickly. How can we get the vast majority of those who want to come and contribute meaningfully to our society and help make it better in the door so that they actually <span style="font-style: italic">can</span> have the opportunity to contribute blah blah blah. That's the problem.</div></div>

All I would say to that and I am not trying to be smart ass but you don't live in Southern Kalifornia. The fraud that takes place here is EPIC. A new fraud that has just been discovered here recently is (insert country of origin) comes into the U.S. and gets on medi-cal, section 8 housing, food stamps, welfare assistance, etc. easily equaling $2000 a month is some instances. This is all deposited into a bank account (even food stamps is a credit card or direct deposit. Then they just leave the country as the bank account keeps getting deposits and additional money from renting out the section 8 home. When the account has a good amount of money in it they come back for vacation with a butt load a cash in the account. The only time there is any form of accounting is to send in monthly forms that usually have one or two people fill out for multiple people. This currently is rampant. Many times the anti-illegal sentiment is founded in seeing the fraud that really pisses the masses off that are really struggling.
</div></div>

You're right, I don't live in California. But I did live in Miami for 25 years, and saw that any Cuban who touched dry land was IMMEDIATELY given a green card courtesy of the government and a job courtesy of the Gloria Estefan foundation within a week of arrival (wet foot/ dry foot).

I definitely wouldn't argue that there aren't those who do abuse the system, but it seems to me that it would be the system's fault in many cases. I have no idea how section 8 works there, but here the money is deposited straight into the homeowner's account not the renter's account (I know because I own a home that I rent via section 8 - which I'm getting ready to sell because being a landlord sucks balls), and a renter is not allowed to sublet the house by law (and it's my responsibility as the owner to insure that the renter indeed lives there). Food stamps go on to a dedicated card that can only be used at certain establishments. If California is stupid enough to give money to illegals outright and not somehow insure that it is being spent correctly, then it seems California's problem, not those who would take advantage of said situation. It's human nature to find loopholes and exploit them. We all do it to one extent or another.

And you're right. Many of us judge a given situation based on the small tidbits we hear that are out of context. It's unfortunate that all we hear about immigration is the situations like you noted. That's all most of us have to go by, but unfortunately it's a small part of a very big, very complex picture.
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

Kalifornia is stupid enough. It is like the L.A. riots. As soon as the first window is broken and someone comes out the window with a T.V. over their shoulder the pack moves in thinking I better get mine before the store is empty. Well this store that we call Kalifornia is just about empty.
Coming to a store near you......
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: BugSniper</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eleaf</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Fair point. But how can one become legal if one must have citizenship first? It doesn't work that way. In fact one must be here for several years (I forget the exact number but either 7 or 10 rings a bell) before one can even apply for citizenship.
</div></div>
We have had amnesty periods before. Anyone left or new can pound sand, thanks. You go back home, and you apply to come back.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eleaf</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I think most immigrants, illegal or not, would qualify with those pretty quickly. How can we get the vast majority of those who want to come and contribute meaningfully to our society and help make it better in the door so that they actually <span style="font-style: italic">can</span> have the opportunity to contribute blah blah blah. That's the problem. </div></div>

Easy, by kicking out the illegal CONSUMING POPULATION, and replacing it with the PRODUCING POPULATION you speak of.

BTW, "supporting yourself" is not coming here and painting at 50% market rates because you, having grown up in a shithole, are willing to live in a rented house or apartment at 2x,3x,and 5x capacity. That forces our domestic population to become unemployed, or lowers their living standards(AKA as our rich get richer, the poor get poorer). Again, you cannot import poverty, ever. It is not in your best interest to adopt dregs unless every other domestic worker is already in a productive, employed state, and you have work that if done, would generate more revenue while not displacing any other required work.
</div></div>

That population I speak of is already here (with 10x as many itching to get here). But they can't be productive because they are not allowed to do so. They cannot legally work, so they MUST take lower wages just to live (the problem is that those lower wages are a shit load more than they get at home). They cannot pay taxes because they will be sent packing if they tried. Most immigrants have committed no crimes other than being immigrants, and any other transgressions are because the system will not allow then to do it the right way.

And to say that we should only take the elite from other places is elitist and hypocritical. Were your ancestors the elite from wherever they hailed? Mine weren't. Mine, and the ancestors of the vast majority of us, had to come for the same reasons immigrants still come; they had no opportunity in "x" and were poor and only getting poorer. My family wasn't "unpoor" until just 2 generations ago when my grandfather had the opportunity to go to college. Judging someone's fitness to be here based on their economic or educational background is no better than basing them off of their skin or eye color. I'm sure that many of us wouldn't want to be judged so harshly, why should we perpetrate that judgment on others. America started as a land of opportunity where one could take nothing and turn it in to something. Why change that arbitrarily?

If they're hard working and willing to contribute, let them come. Immigration isn't the issue, but those who subvert it for their own gain to our detriment (the tax-dollar vacuums). That is the problem that needs to be dealt with.
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Ramrod14(winkie)</div><div class="ubbcode-body">eleaf, you asked why we believe that liberals are always wrong and the conservatives are always right? The answer is simple, they just are! </div></div>

How's that workin' out for ya?
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eleaf</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
And to say that we should only take the elite from other places is elitist and hypocritical. Were your ancestors the elite from wherever they hailed? Mine weren't. Mine, and the ancestors of the vast majority of us, had to come for the same reasons immigrants still come; they had no opportunity in "x" and were poor and only getting poorer. My family wasn't "unpoor" until just 2 generations ago when my grandfather had the opportunity to go to college. Judging someone's fitness to be here based on their economic or educational background is no better than basing them off of their skin or eye color. </div></div>

LOL. Right now we say "Where are you from?" Russia? Sorry, too many already this year. South America, Africa? Awesome! We do discriminate on skin color currently, albeit indirectly because we directly discriminate by coordinates. Doing it on achievement would be a huge step UP.

My family came as indentured servants. That's a similar structure to what I outlined, and one that quite honestly should still be legal IMO. We should also clearly be varying our entrance allowances sharply, whimsically even, on our economic snapshot. Otherwise you do nothing but subvert your currency, again through intrinsic and basic math.

You have shown a tremendous lack of knowledge on this subject honestly. If you have not lived in or at least seen the southwest, you don't know shit about shit frankly. You can't, beyond supposition. Do you want to see the demographics on foreclosures and "multi-occupancy" dwellings, even in rich areas? Disease demographics? Illegals have decimated, absolutely decimated areas of the southwest like locusts. As a whole, I'd rather see us retreat than try to reconstruct it. They took it back, boldy and in plain sight.

Mechanic is right, coming to a store near you.

Also, your statement on middle tier workers needs addressing, just briefly. Our economic planners decided we should export our low and middle wage jobs to other countries and become a "knowledge-based economy." Pffft! Someone wasn't tracking our test scores when they had that idea. Regardless, in order to succeed in this forced environment, you need to have a certain amount of raw material. If you lack that, you are left scrounging for work. Bringing in all these beloved "hard workers" necessarily screws over our own hard workers, born on US soil. Unless we reestablish solidly our physical exports, these people you describe simply do not have work here, unless, necesssarily, we sink to the economic level of the country that occupies that space currently.

Carry your logic to its inclusion for your own sake. Let's just say we bring in 100 million rural Chinese, good hard-working stock from the worldwide leader in economic growth. What happens in your fantasy? The hut people dictate rates, period. Any of the suckers that aren't insulated by a generation because of regulations like licensing (doctors, lawyers) will see their standaard of living decrease because the hut people will compromise somewhere between hut and McMansion, but can always say McMansion-$1 and be happy.

 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: BugSniper</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eleaf</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
And to say that we should only take the elite from other places is elitist and hypocritical. Were your ancestors the elite from wherever they hailed? Mine weren't. Mine, and the ancestors of the vast majority of us, had to come for the same reasons immigrants still come; they had no opportunity in "x" and were poor and only getting poorer. My family wasn't "unpoor" until just 2 generations ago when my grandfather had the opportunity to go to college. Judging someone's fitness to be here based on their economic or educational background is no better than basing them off of their skin or eye color. </div></div>

LOL. Right now we say "Where are you from?" Russia? Sorry, too many already this year. South America, Africa? Awesome! We do discriminate on skin color currently, albeit indirectly because we directly discriminate by coordinates. Doing it on achievement would be a huge step UP.

My family came as indentured servants. That's a similar structure to what I outlined, and one that quite honestly should still be legal IMO. We should also clearly be varying our entrance allowances sharply, whimsically even, on our economic snapshot. Otherwise you do nothing but subvert your currency, again through intrinsic and basic math.

You have shown a tremendous lack of knowledge on this subject honestly. If you have not lived in or at least seen the southwest, you don't know shit about shit frankly. You can't, beyond supposition. Do you want to see the demographics on foreclosures and "multi-occupancy" dwellings, even in rich areas? Disease demographics? Illegals have decimated, absolutely decimated areas of the southwest like locusts. As a whole, I'd rather see us retreat than try to reconstruct it. They took it back, boldy and in plain sight.

Mechanic is right, coming to a store near you.

Also, your statement on middle tier workers needs addressing, just briefly. Our economic planners decided we should export our low and middle wage jobs to other countries and become a "knowledge-based economy." Pffft! Someone wasn't tracking our test scores when they had that idea. Regardless, in order to succeed in this forced environment, you need to have a certain amount of raw material. If you lack that, you are left scrounging for work. Bringing in all these beloved "hard workers" necessarily screws over our own hard workers, born on US soil. Unless we reestablish solidly our physical exports, these people you describe simply do not have work here, unless, necesssarily, we sink to the economic level of the country that occupies that space currently.

Carry your logic to its inclusion for your own sake. Let's just say we bring in 100 million rural Chinese, good hard-working stock from the worldwide leader in economic growth. What happens in your fantasy? The hut people dictate rates, period. Any of the suckers that aren't insulated by a generation because of regulations like licensing (doctors, lawyers) will see their standaard of living decrease because the hut people will compromise somewhere between hut and McMansion, but can always say McMansion-$1 and be happy.

</div></div>

I'm not meaning to insinuate that we should simply open the flood gates. That's not the answer either. What I am suggesting is that we need to come up with a <span style="font-style: italic">real</span> plan of legally gaining entry that fits our modern era. I don't have the answer, I never claimed I did, but clearly we need to find some method of figuring out the problem and dealing with it that doesn't involve ridiculous measures like walls and electric fences and permanently stationed military forces along our borders (even if only because these methods will never work and be a huge drain on the taxpayers at the same time). Part of that solution, however, needs to be a clear avenue of legally gaining entry that isn't convoluted and that doesn't take forever and a day to accomplish. Even many immigrants who have come here legally, been educated here, have worked here and paid taxes here have a difficult time staying without being illegal. I have a friend, a Brazilian, who had to join the military after trying for 10 years to get residency, and this was after being educated in America and contributing every bit as much as you or I. Another, a Canadian, was forced to marry before she (and her husband) were ready. She was educated here, and had a good job as a teacher on a student/work visa, then suddenly got a letter saying you have to go by "x" date or be deported. There is a problem when we are shooing educated, hard working, law abiding immigrants. There's no wonder that illegal immigration is a problem when doing it legally is a pipe dream.

Again, you're attributing a huge, very complex problem to one small part of the puzzle and calling it a day. I have no doubt that some illegals are a drain on the housing market/job market/whatever other market you can come up with, but to attribute all of our current economic woes to illegals is shortsighted. Everyone has these problems. There are far more US born Americans who have foreclosed on their homes than illegal aliens. There are far more US born Americans who are a drain on the taxpayers than illegal aliens. I'm not saying that it makes illegals right or special or anything, but I am pointing out that it is the system that is broken in many places, most of it perpetrated by US born Americans, not simply a problem involving illegal aliens. They are but a small part of a very complex issue when it comes to our current economic woes.

Actually our test scores <span style="font-style: italic">used</span> to be very good until our modern school system run by teachers unions who care more about teachers than students took over. Then those "step backs" were further made worse by abominable policies like "No Child Left Behind." We have fallen, and that isn't because of anything other than politicians and activists taking over things they know nothing about. We've priced ourselves out of the job market by not allowing the market to be a free market. We go in with free market ideas, but just end up regulating business to the point that it's not profitable to allow the free market to work here. Minimum wage is the worst of those offenses. All it does is arbitrarily drive up the cost of living. It doesn't make those with less have more, as it's designed to do, it makes everyone have less because as people make more money, that money becomes worth less and drives up the cost of everything. Since we as a people have artificially driven up wages by over-regulation, we have also artificially driven up the cost of living to the point where our companies cannot sustain themselves <span style="font-style: italic">and</span> their American workers, we must rely on cheap labor from overseas (and here) to compensate for it. You can't place the blame on immigrants for a problem caused by Americans and our need to over-regulate and over compensate. Do you know of any Americans who are willing to make a product and sell it at Chinese prices? Me neither. Or of any who will work for Chinese wages? Me neither. Would you pay far more for everything that you buy, with the same money you have now, so you can say you have American made everything? Not likely, and even if so, you are definitely in the minority.

The problem economically is that we want our cake and we want to eat it too. We all want goods made in America by Americans, and we want to buy them cheaply. Our current system does not allow for that. Something must give.

And that has nothing to do with illegals, but with our insistence on buying a shit load of crap for cheap using money that we've strong armed companies into paying just to make us feel better about our existence. Immigrants are not taking our jobs. We are giving them away because we won't work for prices we are willing to pay for the things we buy.
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: shooter65</div><div class="ubbcode-body">We as a country should only deal in results not politics.

We are merely P.T.P. "Puppets to Politics" </div></div>

In a larger context, absolutely. In the context of the thread, I'll pretend like I understand where you're going.
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eleaf</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Actually our test scores used to be very good until our modern school system run by teachers unions who care more about teachers than students took over. Then those "step backs" were further made worse by abominable policies like "No Child Left Behind." We have fallen, and that isn't because of anything other than politicians and activists taking over things they know nothing about. We've priced ourselves out of the job market by not allowing the market to be a free market. We go in with free market ideas, but just end up regulating business to the point that it's not profitable to allow the free market to work here. Minimum wage is the worst of those offenses. All it does is arbitrarily drive up the cost of living. It doesn't make those with less have more, as it's designed to do, it makes everyone have less because as people make more money, that money becomes worth less and drives up the cost of everything. Since we as a people have artificially driven up wages by over-regulation, we have also artificially driven up the cost of living to the point where our companies cannot sustain themselves and their American workers, we must rely on cheap labor from overseas (and here) to compensate for it. You can't place the blame on immigrants for a problem caused by Americans and our need to over-regulate and over compensate. Do you know of any Americans who are willing to make a product and sell it at Chinese prices? Me neither. Or of any who will work for Chinese wages? Me neither. Would you pay far more for everything that you buy, with the same money you have now, so you can say you have American made everything? Not likely, and even if so, you are definitely in the minority.

</div></div>

This I can agree with. Perhaps you should remove your cabeza from your culo more often!
laugh.gif


Just kidding, sheeesh
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: queequeg</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eleaf</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Actually our test scores used to be very good until our modern school system run by teachers unions who care more about teachers than students took over. Then those "step backs" were further made worse by abominable policies like "No Child Left Behind." We have fallen, and that isn't because of anything other than politicians and activists taking over things they know nothing about. We've priced ourselves out of the job market by not allowing the market to be a free market. We go in with free market ideas, but just end up regulating business to the point that it's not profitable to allow the free market to work here. Minimum wage is the worst of those offenses. All it does is arbitrarily drive up the cost of living. It doesn't make those with less have more, as it's designed to do, it makes everyone have less because as people make more money, that money becomes worth less and drives up the cost of everything. Since we as a people have artificially driven up wages by over-regulation, we have also artificially driven up the cost of living to the point where our companies cannot sustain themselves and their American workers, we must rely on cheap labor from overseas (and here) to compensate for it. You can't place the blame on immigrants for a problem caused by Americans and our need to over-regulate and over compensate. Do you know of any Americans who are willing to make a product and sell it at Chinese prices? Me neither. Or of any who will work for Chinese wages? Me neither. Would you pay far more for everything that you buy, with the same money you have now, so you can say you have American made everything? Not likely, and even if so, you are definitely in the minority.

</div></div>

This I can agree with. Perhaps you should remove your cabeza from your culo more often!
laugh.gif


Just kidding, sheeesh </div></div>

I told you I'm not the flaming liberal everyone thinks I am!

shocked.gif
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

I didn't call you a liberal. I don't think you are and haven't previously. Frankly, I tire of the word for its imprecision. I have long stated that the difference between a socialist and a communist is that the former doesn't have the balls to admit he's a communist. The latter is just more honest. Calling them progressives or liberals is a distraction.

My beef with illegal immigration isn't the obvious pragmatism displayed by border crossers, seeking opportunity elsewhere because their own land is so monstrously fucked up. No, my beef is that it is welcomed for the same reason the schools were screwed with: Legions of easily duped consumers of diversion, recreation, entertainment; and solid voters for the very gutless communists who know why things are as they are. That is why it is completely logical for them to make 20 million illegal immigrants instant citizens (fast tracked...). At least 85% of them will vote for the masquerading communists, who will repay them with inducements away from the work ethic that brought them here, to the structured indolence of the welfare state.

And this is why my resolve to to prevent additional narcotics to become legally available, tolerated, encouraged, expected...is steadfast. Collectivism demands a passive society: an ignorant populous is easily induced to mob rule when the mere dangling of yet more tit milk is offered to be taken from the rich.

So I make no judgement of your politics in general. I believe you are profoundly wrong regarding what is required to deal with the narco-trafficking and consumption influences in both the United States and Mexico. It isn't moralistic or ignorant to attempt to quantify the consequences of legalizing or decriminalizing any or all additional mind altering substances presently outlawed.

It is apolitical. Yet make no mistake, I do believe one political party prospers far more than the other by incentivizing greater drug use. Disputing that does not constitute liberalism in my view; it is simply being obtuse, naive or dishonest.

I have to see more before I conclude which of the three it is.



 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: queequeg</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I din't call you a liberal. I don't think you are and haven't previously. Frankly, I tire of the word for its imprecision. I have long stated that the difference between a socialist and a communist is that the former doesn't have the balls to admit he's a communist. The latter is just more honest. Calling them progressives or liberals is a distraction.</div></div>

I didn't mean to suggest that you, personally have said that. But make no mistake, it has been said (in more ways than I knew even existed).

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">My beef with illegal immigration isn't the obvious pragmatism displayed by border crossers, seeking opportunity elsewhere because their own land is so monstrously fucked up. No my beef is that it is welcomed for the same reason the schools were screwed with: Legions of easily duped consumers of diversion, recreation, entertainment and solid voters for the very gutless communists who know why things are as they are. That is why it is completely logical for them to make 20 million illegal immigrants instant citizens (fast tracked...). At least 85% of them will vote for the socialists, who will repay them with inducements away from the work ethic that brought them to the structured indolence of the welfare state.</div></div>

But, if you remember correctly, even Bush was a strong supporter of "amnesty." Though you do make a valid point: whoever pushes for amnesty and gets it will win some of that demographic for good. But I think you oversimplify the direct result of instant sheep sucking on government teet. Very few things have a direct cause and result, especially when dealing with a very large number of people. Things just aren't that simple. Had you considered that perhaps a large chunk of those immigrants who do work hard and who do contribute to society will find those living off the teet as reprehensible as you or I, and that they might have incentive to reject said teet because they too are primarily interested in keeping their money and not giving it away to the lazy fucks who make all immigrants looks bad? After all it isn't the lack of government teet that makes these people immigrate, but a lack of any opportunity at all.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">And this is why my resolve to to prevent additional narcotics to become legally available, tolerated, encouraged, expected...is steadfast. Collectivism demands a passive society: an ignorant populous is easily induced to mob rule with the mere dangling of yet more tit milk taken from the rich.</div></div>

As I stated before, people use drugs whether it's legal or not. And it's very simplistic to think that all drug users are stoned all of the time. Is everyone who drinks drunk all of the time? You're making some assumptions about human behavior that are pretty far fetched which come from decades of fear being used as a political motivator for prohibition.

Would you suddenly flock to using drugs were it legalized tomorrow? If you wouldn't, why do you have such the firm belief that everyone else would and we would turn into a nation of stoned zombies? Holland hasn't, and they've had legal drugs of all kinds for about 3 decades (perhaps longer). In fact, their drug use is less than the US per capita, and much lower amongst younger demographics (teenagers). The legalization of something and the flocking of everyone to said activity is a misnomer. Life doesn't work that way, and there is no evidence to suggest that it would.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So I make no judgement of your politics in general. I believe you are profoundly wrong regarding what is required to deal with the narco-trafficking influences in both the United States and Mexico. It isn't moralistic or ignorant to attempt to quantify the consequences of legalizing or decriminalizing any or all additional mind altering substances.
</div></div>

Disagreement is good. It's healthy. It leads to discussions and discussion leads to common ground which leads to progress to the benefit of all.

Finger pointing and blaming, as is the norm from representatives on both sides of the aisle, as well as their constituencies, is only detrimental and the state of our nation reflects this well. We're divided profoundly on every issue and fail to see that neither extreme is a very good way to go. It's tough to find a republican who doesn't find a way to blame democrats for everything wrong with our great country, and ditto for democrats who don't always find a way to blame republicans for everything, when in reality both have done their fair share of fucking things up. We aren't in the shithole mess because some republicans fucked it up or because democrats fucked it up, but because both republicans and democrats have been fucking it up for years. Only when people can finally see that the political dichotomy we have is complete bullshit designed to stifle our thinking as individuals can we begin to heal and again start to make progress as a nation. Both parties are the problem, and neither has a legit answer. That's why they point fingers and blame.
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: The Mechanic</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: shooter65</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Group Hug....</div></div>
Only if you got big titties shooter65.
smile.gif
</div></div>

I would think that it would be an even worse hug if he does have big titties. Nothin' worse than being molested by man-titties!
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: The Mechanic</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Legal immigrant= Someone who has not only gone through the bureaucratic B.S. but has also shown the ability to support him or herself and passed a citizenship test as well as all necessary inoculations and tests for deadly communicable diseases such as T.B.

Illegal= someone who will do none of the above no matter what country they come from including our friends to the north Canada.</div></div>

Well guess I get to quote my own post. Local school that my 2 oldest kids went to now has a confirmed case of tuberculosis. Guess I really nailed that one. Will be pulling my daughter out of school today until it has been handled. Once again immigration effects everyone.

http://www.10news.com/news/22889712/detail.html
 
Re: Another incursion by Mexican forces

Gonna be a meeting April 29 talking about the happenings on the border http://www.mcallen.net/news/default/2010...g_april_29.aspx
Rep. Gonzales to Host Border Security Hearing April 29

some of the latest in my area: port of entry camargo 20 trucks attacked the Mexican side took all the money and kidnapped port director and secretary, US side closed down for a few hours. Additional deputies and swat teams from nearby counties called in to support the local leos.

US side: school cancels baseball practice due the the reports of machine gun fire and hand grenades that could be heard here on the US side. "the attack was on the Mexican side but if you look at any map you will see the border cities on Mexican side can be seen from US side".

Local man sentenced in US court for his involvement in the kidnapping and subsequent murder of another local man. He was kidnapped then held at a ranch on US side then spirited across the border and was melted in such a fashion as to make identification impossible.

So far six US citizens report being carjacked in Mexico for their large suv's or truck's needed by cartel members as replacements when cartel's vehicles are destroyed in combat. US authorities say that their is nothing they can do as the crime occurred in Mexico.

Local father special forces Vietnam vet retired lost contact with his son in camargo mexico and was interviewed by local news. He and some vet friends went to camargo but did not find son. He was interviewed by news again and he reported that the town was a ghost town with many businesses and homes burned out "houses are cinder block and concrete so they don't burn down like stick frame construction". The father was later contacted by son who said everything was ok.

http://www.borderlandbeat.com/2010/04/extortions-and-murders-continue-in.html
father killed in mexico son and daughter live in US go to mex for answers both are executed.

I could go on and on but whats the point? I live here and their are community members who do not want to know about whats going on here. what makes you think we can convince anyone that does not have a vested interest in the area? some of us tried to use this forum as a kind of early warning system letting you know to raise a concern wherever you live. I have a hunch that even when the cartels spread throughout the USA you will still not be convinced even when they carjack your truck so they can keep battling police in your area.