Idk. They’re violent savages. I’m sure there should no rookie numbers there either.Where is the black-on-black crime data?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Idk. They’re violent savages. I’m sure there should no rookie numbers there either.Where is the black-on-black crime data?
AND on top of that - this dude also has the scars of having had a trach. That's with a bandana over a mask. He wont run far.
AND on top of that - this dude also has the scars of having had a trach. That's with a bandana over a mask. He wont run far.
Something else about this train wreck that tells the whole story: Nobody else in the group squared him away. That means one of three things: they either just met as a group, don't really know each other and don't train together or the rest don't know what they are doing either. Or all of it. One dude can tell a story.
NFAC->armed wing of KFC
![]()
![]()
Scary thing is those fuckers did intend to be locked and loaded.........
You have to admit shit going on in US at the present is like out of some wild script from a DPRKpropagandanews machine, they could not make this shit up.
Its approaching incredulousnes of the fake news stories on the Norks ,you know the execution via hungry dogs or aircraft cannon only shit is so real its trolling itself ROFL
No fucking about coalition NFAC-> armed wing of KFC![]()
When that stuff is stolen from fellow citizens it comes with sights in place, and usually already sighted in.....unless it was all stolen from gun stores.Watching the initial video of those guys marching past, it looked like someone dressed them up. I don’t think that level of ignorance, mags missing, backwards, sights missing and mismatched, and whatever else, goes along with people getting this gear in the first place. Looks like someone showered some hood rats with confiscated weapons. Lost and found armory.
Trunk Monkey would have been funny!
Stop it. Having a different opinion from you isn't trolling. That's a lazy accusation to try to deter people from disagreeing with you.
Do you think threads involving talking about the best way to shoot up a crowd of protesters will endear anyone on the fence to support the 2A?
There is no fence for 2A.
By the way, I havent seen such a thread. Perhaps it does exist (in the form you mention), and I missed it? Quite possible. However...
Record NCIS checks and all signs lead to this continuing in the near future. Perhaps the people in a crowd dont want to be sitting ducks and defenseless. On the flip, peolpe see mass riots and do not want to be caught defenseless either. America is arming up now more than ever before. Is that fence sitting? Now, who is arming up and a better question is why are they arming up? Sense of things to come, or sense for things that could come?
Aside from this verifiable stat from NCIS data, there is a second point. People cant sit on a fence that isnt really there, right? Sorry brother, my condolences but... 2A is law of the land. Its in writing too (somewhere, but I forget where), if you care to go look (use your "googlefu").
People can sit on the imaginary fence all they want. There is an endless supply of handwringers that will coddle those sitting on the imaginary fence. Debating in anguishing detail whether someone made "them" look good or bad, if they had the right kit, held low ready (lol) and a plethera of other aspects which encompass what I call "muh optics". All this while their rights are taken away, small bites at a time. Then point the finger at the gun, much like anti2A instead of putting blame where it belongs...on the individual.
I am now 90% convinced that "muh optics" is really just a diversion tactic meant to divide (better yet its meant to prevent cohesion). I could still be wrong, hence the 10%.
But thank you for letting "us" know where you stand.
The fact is, there are people who are on the fence whether you see it there or not. That's why there are plenty of states with restrictions on the 2A. And people talking violence scares the shit out of people who don't own firearms and pushes them towards wanting more restrictions.There is no fence for 2A.
The fact is, there are people who are on the fence whether you see it there or not. That's why there are plenty of states with restrictions on the 2A. And people talking violence scares the shit out of people who don't own firearms and pushes them towards wanting more restrictions.
Claim the 2A is unlimited all you want, I still can't carry in NJ and the Supreme Court refuses to call that Unconstitutional. NJ has plenty of restrictions that the SCOTUS has been fine with. So as long as the legislators and judicial branch are okay with restricting our rights, I don't see what we gain from antagonizing them. None of my friends own guns but I've happily explained to them gun ownership and how many laws are pointless. Now they understand why legislators are full of shit with their feel good laws. Violence and threats of it just scares people into begging politicians for more gun control. It's just poking the bear.
I guessed you missed multiple pages of people in this very thread talking about who would be better at showing an armed protest.Where is the thread you previously mentioned?
Yes, as I stated and maybe didnt fully articulate.
There are people sitting on the imaginary fence. And pandering to them has done what, exactly? Result is? Pretty much what you explain. The results are apparent.
Instead of tripping all over ourselves in effort to coddle the imaginary fence sitters (since it has worked so swell thus far) perhaps the energy is better spent in a more constructive manner? Any ideas?
Or, is there still that much room to sway "hearts and minds". Which will one day reverse all the damage done to 2A (lol)?
The fact is, there are people who are on the fence whether you see it there or not. That's why there are plenty of states with restrictions on the 2A. And people talking violence scares the shit out of people who don't own firearms and pushes them towards wanting more restrictions.
Claim the 2A is unlimited all you want, I still can't carry in NJ and the Supreme Court refuses to call that Unconstitutional. NJ has plenty of restrictions that the SCOTUS has been fine with. So as long as the legislators and judicial branch are okay with restricting our rights, I don't see what we gain from antagonizing them. None of my friends own guns but I've happily explained to them gun ownership and how many laws are pointless. Now they understand why legislators are full of shit with their feel good laws. Violence and threats of it just scares people into begging politicians for more gun control. It's just poking the bear.
LOL Deal with the devil. More like not intentionally antagonizing the swing vote.Your attitude and many like you, makes you a pushover. This is why your state has shit gun laws.
No one is afraid of you, because you are eager to make a deal for your cake, with those who want your cake. You will soon have no cake, and are eager to yell at your fellow gun owners, and tell them to make a deal with the devil.
Fuck all who think like you. You are the problem, not the rowdy among us.
What other option do we have besides the hearts and minds approach?
I guessed you missed multiple pages of people in this very thread talking about who would be better at showing an armed protest.
What other option do we have besides the hearts and minds approach? The courts have proven they don't care about the 2A. Republicans and Democrats alike have proven they don't care about the 2A. But so much of gun control involves pushes by people ignorant about guns. I don't know what state you live in. But mine isn't pro-2A. Half my time talking to non-gun owners is spent convincing them we aren't all insane.
Are your neighbors making state policy?I guessed you missed multiple pages of people in this very thread talking about who would be better at showing an armed protest.
What other option do we have besides the hearts and minds approach? The courts have proven they don't care about the 2A. Republicans and Democrats alike have proven they don't care about the 2A. But so much of gun control involves pushes by people ignorant about guns. I don't know what state you live in. But mine isn't pro-2A. Half my time talking to non-gun owners is spent convincing them we aren't all insane.
Lead by example.LOL Deal with the devil. More like not intentionally antagonizing the swing vote.
I guessed you missed multiple pages of people in this very thread talking about who would be better at showing an armed protest.
What other option do we have besides the hearts and minds approach? The courts have proven they don't care about the 2A. Republicans and Democrats alike have proven they don't care about the 2A. But so much of gun control involves pushes by people ignorant about guns. I don't know what state you live in. But mine isn't pro-2A. Half my time talking to non-gun owners is spent convincing them we aren't all insane.
2 in the heart, one in the mind..I guessed you missed multiple pages of people in this very thread talking about who would be better at showing an armed protest.
What other option do we have besides the hearts and minds approach? The courts have proven they don't care about the 2A. Republicans and Democrats alike have proven they don't care about the 2A. But so much of gun control involves pushes by people ignorant about guns. I don't know what state you live in. But mine isn't pro-2A. Half my time talking to non-gun owners is spent convincing them we aren't all insane.
I guess I'm just used to having success using logic on friends and family.2 in the heart, one in the mind..
I have my rights because my God gave them to me. I have a constitution that acknowledges that I have rights given by God. I took a oath to defend said constitution. From any enemy, foreign and domestic. If you can’t bring yourself to fight for your rights then give your gun to someone who will.
Are you for the constitution or against it?
I guess I'm just used to having success using logic on friends and family.
The fact is, there are people who are on the fence whether you see it there or not. That's why there are plenty of states with restrictions on the 2A. And people talking violence scares the shit out of people who don't own firearms and pushes them towards wanting more restrictions.
Claim the 2A is unlimited all you want, I still can't carry in NJ and the Supreme Court refuses to call that Unconstitutional. NJ has plenty of restrictions that the SCOTUS has been fine with. So as long as the legislators and judicial branch are okay with restricting our rights, I don't see what we gain from antagonizing them. None of my friends own guns but I've happily explained to them gun ownership and how many laws are pointless. Now they understand why legislators are full of shit with their feel good laws. Violence and threats of it just scares people into begging politicians for more gun control. It's just poking the bear.
But thats not what you posted. You said...
"Do you think threads involving talking about the best way to shoot up a crowd of protesters will endear anyone on the fence to support the 2A?"
I simply asked where I could find these threads...plural.
The answer to your question of what to do is complex. Going with results oriented methods currently deployed today...Id say a couple hundred thousand firearm owners marching down the street peacefully and non disruptively would be a good start.
But what if a "nazi" or some other fucking whacko attends and fucks things up? Got to blame ALL firearm owners then, right? See I told you guns should be illegal.
I mean, after all...we must coddle the fence sitters and win hearts and minds. You cant talk sense into everyone. You will learn that as you get older.
Stop worrying about other peoples feelings for which you have no control and very little if any influence. Dont go out of your way to be a dick either though![]()
If feds are in here trolling and baiting when there is other scum rioting they should be fired for dereliction.
If you are not part of the solution you are part of the problem.
GTFO
Pretty damn sneaky if you ask. I figured that it was the Oompa Looompa that was taking a knee to the BLM assholes.Oh they are definitely in here. I almost, almost made a post last week saying that they shouldn’t try so hard as it was very apparent. The one in particular, not this guy, is still here. But I let it be. I wanted to see how much more blatant it could get. Lmao.
The ten year members with 15 posts that says he reads but doesn't like to add anything to the conversation. Then goes on to post 30 times in a couple threads?
Pretty damn sneaky if you ask. I figured that it was the Oompa Looompa that was taking a knee to the BLM assholes.
Well his mask does say he can't breathe. He's just letting folks know beforehand.AND on top of that - this dude also has the scars of having had a trach. That's with a bandana over a mask. He wont run far.
on the man berating the passengar van driver in the one clip, once he demands money from said driver, gun in hand, is that not agg attempted robbery?
You didn’t answer the man.I guess I'm just used to having success using logic on friends and family.
Anybody who cant see this is a fed op, is blind as all fuck. Jesus, you really think these morons are capable of organizing a lemonade stand, let alone a fucking armed insurgency?
SSDD.
For it. I just understand there are limits placed on us whether we like it or not.You didn’t answer the man.
Are you for the Constitution or against it?