Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below!
Join the contestThanks...do you see anything like this:Maybe this? I don't know.
I noticed this. It looks like a nano-dick width (technical measurement) of where the anodizing / boring / chamfer come together?
You can barely feel it with your fingernail. These things are so beautiful otherwise, I'm hard pressed to think this is an issue.
I'll buy you a steak dinner if you can see it once an optic is mounted, and or if it effects functionality.
View attachment 8051954
Lots of machining/tool marks on the exterior ring surfaces
Maybe this? I don't know.
I noticed this. It looks like a nano-dick width (technical measurement) of where the anodizing / boring / chamfer come together?
You can barely feel it with your fingernail. These things are so beautiful otherwise, I'm hard pressed to think this is an issue.
I'll buy you a steak dinner if you can see it once an optic is mounted, and or if it effects functionality.
View attachment 8051954
I mentioned as much when I brought it up.If the broken edge of the anodizing is on the chamfer, I doubt that it will come into contact with the scope body. As you stated, it may be cosmetic...
I don't but I also bought an MDT "blem/second" where apparently it has tool marks that were unacceptable in QC. I have yet to find them.Thanks...do you see anything like this:
I ask because everything I have ever bought from 419 has been machined and finished beautifully but I also do not disbelieve @TheOE800 at all. Just sort of wondering if he got a one off, less that perfect, escaped past QA, set of rings or???
I agree, something ain't right with those caps.I’m not a huge fan of toolpathing.View attachment 8052415
I kind of see what you're talking about now. I went back and looked at mine. If you get zoomed in really close you can see the tool path. Mine don't look as defined as yours. Personally, it doesn't bother me.I’m not a huge fan of toolpathing.View attachment 8052415
Yes, but isn't that true of all aluminum rings...that is, the fasteners are steel?I absolutely don’t like is the steel screw threads into the aluminum.
Perhaps? These are my first rings in over ten years. My unimounts have 1/2” nuts that thread onto steel studs (military style) or a steel threadsert on the opposite side of the clamp bar that the bolt screws into.Yes, but isn't that true of all aluminum rings...that is, the fasteners are steel?
Yeah, I couldn't say, personally. I have only run steel rings and have never own aluminum.Perhaps? These are my first rings in over ten years. My unimounts have 1/2” nuts that thread onto steel studs (military style) or a steel threadsert on the opposite side of the clamp bar that the bolt screws into.
Things I do like include the pinned caps, similar to in function I presume to the skirted caps that RRS included on their mounts.
The future is now old man!Yeah, I couldn't say, personally. I have only run steel rings and have never own aluminum.
Cheers
Fuck that....nap time is NOW, young un' hahahThe future is now old man!
Yeah, I couldn't say, personally. I have only run steel rings and have never own aluminum.
And yes, I do use actual modern design rings....made by ARC! haha
Yes, you’re right…they are aluminum.
7075, yes, but these are cut tapped because of the fairly thin sidewalls of the ring. With the hard ano after cutting, we thought it the best method.7075 alu, and threads. I'm gonna put a wager that the threads are roll tapped, not cut tapped.
This would be the correct way to put any thread in alloy as it makes them stronger.
@flyer1a can you confirm ?