There's enough new accounts in here with no posts - anything is possible.Is this going to turn into tip touching?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There's enough new accounts in here with no posts - anything is possible.Is this going to turn into tip touching?
I'm with Spife here and a bit confused. Are we not, indeed, talking about the interface between the uni adapter and either their break or their suppressor mount? And therefore is completely in Area 419's control.Y’all do realize that the taper being discussed has nothing to do with the specific model of can, right? It’s a 419 muzzle adaptor to a 419 can adaptor plate.
Should be pretty easy to make the can adaptors work again, especially since they did before and still do for the brakes, or take the blurb about it off the website because if it’s not being used for the can adaptor plate.
Are we not, indeed, talking about the interface between the uni adapter and either their break or their suppressor mount?
Am I correct that it is a fact that the taper between the uni adapter and their suppressor mount/Hellfire break is no longer functional?
With good threads and shoulder repeatability is high. Most will never have or perceive a change.
That said, the goal of tapers to squeeze more consistency and repeatability out of a system - raising the bar if you will. What really didn't sit well with me is going from a taper system like TBAC and stepping BACK to a square shoulder defeating the purpose. Especially when investing in TBAC suppressors for precision rigs - these are signs one is going above and beyond to achieve a specific goal at tremendous expense. Those folks should understand the dynamics of the solutions they are employing and how they can impact the overall system and result.
I think everyone's been pretty patient with your dumb ass but you keep doubling down on stupid.- The taper is no longer functional between the Universal Adapter and the A419 Suppressor Mounts.
- It is functional between the Universal Adapter and the Brakes.
That said, as I have said previously in this thread:
I like my Hellfire systems, just surprised the tapers are not functional for suppressor mounts.
I am going to continue to use mine for everything but my long range precision rifle setups with TBACs. Heck, I am still going to use the Hellfire on my TBACs when I attach them to non-long range precision rifles because it's a very handy, light weight, low profile system that allows a lot of transportability / compatibility for my rigs.
Right. Because it was designed for their brakes not mounting a silencer. The fact that it can accommodate silencers is a bonusHaving read this thread I don't think the argument is whether tapers work or are needed. It's that Area 419 advertises that it uses tapers on it's suppressor adapters but aren't. I'm wondering why they would continue to advertise using them if they aren't and if there was a change made why they didn't make it public? It maybe be that the OP is full of it but it would be nice if Craig or Jon would clear this up.
Right. Because it was designed for their brakes not mounting a silencer. The fact that it can accommodate silencers is a bonus
But I understand how this sentence is confusing by itself. If you read the whole page it’s clear
I get that but for example the sidewinder universal adapter advertises working with the tomb style suppressor mount and then directly below says "Universal adapter uses a taper surface similar to a machine tool for the absolute best alignment with the muzzle threads." That would lead most anyone not knowing ahead of time to believe that the suppressor mount would use the tapers surface. Just seems like misleading advertising for no reason.Right. Because it was designed for their brakes not mounting a silencer. The fact that it can accommodate silencers is a bonus
It’s called the hellfire universal adapter. The hellfire is a brake.I get that but for example the sidewinder universal adapter advertises working with the tomb style suppressor mount and then directly below says "Universal adapter uses a taper surface similar to a machine tool for the absolute best alignment with the muzzle threads." That would lead most anyone not knowing ahead of time to believe that the suppressor mount would use the tapers surface. Just seems like misleading advertising for no reason.
If they are all like that, that’s pretty disappointing.Area 419 representatives confirmed this, when they were contacted. If I had public Area 419 materials which made this clear, I would link everyone directly to that, but I do not. Everything I have been able to find discusses tapers and their advantages.
The representatives indicated that the suppressor adapters originally did rely upon mated tapered surfaces, but they have since abandoned the mating of those tapers in the suppressor adapters. This would not be obvious to consumers of the same as the tapered surfaces are still machined and present on the suppressor adapters. These tapers are so close to mating it's not possible to tell they do not without leveraging special techniques.
As @E. Bryant alludes, there are fairly simple to employ techniques one may leverage to demonstrate this. Of course, this alone doesn't preclude the possibility of out of specification parts. Sample size is relevant, which is why one needs confirmation from the manufacturer themselves.
Credit to the others who discovered this, devised the methods and provided the materials. With permission.
The issue is the whole point of the hellfire mounting system is that the brake and suppressor adapters attach to the hellfire mount via a taper. Ensuring best possible alignment and making installation and removal easier/threads won’t get carbon locked.So I bought the sidewinder mount and the ultra 9 attachment. I have yet to use it waiting on the ultra 9 to get out of jail. I skimmed threw this a little but is the claim these are not repeatable when taking on and off? Zero change? Other people on here that use them said they loved them and very repeatable. Hopefully I find out soon how good but I don't plan on shooting anything not suppressed
I guess area 419 could straighten this all up. I haven't even used my attachments yet or suppressor mount. But from alot of people they are good to go.The issue is the whole point of the hellfire mounting system is that the brake and suppressor adapters attach to the hellfire mount via a taper. Ensuring best possible alignment and making installation and removal easier/threads won’t get carbon locked.
What’s been reported is the suppressor adapters taper’s are apparently just cosmetic now. But until it’s confirmed or denied it’s just here say. There is one report and pictures of one suppressor adapter being cosmetic.
So then test it. Remove o ring, screw 2 pieces together and see if they touch.I guess area 419 could straighten this all up. I haven't even used my attachments yet or suppressor mount. But from alot of people they are good to go.
Thanks for all that. As I customer and someone who is all in on the hellfire and sidewinder, I think I can ubeerstand where some confusion comes in based on the description on the web. I understand the taper is for the brake, but it kind of makes it seem like the taper is used for the suppressors as well. A small clarification could cure future misconceptions like this even though the vast majority already understand this.Unsure why OP didn't just post the email replies I sent to him, would have saved a lot of uninformed time for the forum. Guess I'll basically copy/paste for him. I'll check this one more time in a day or so, but am probably not going to spend a ton of time arguing about the system that has worked for a massive number of people, and is produced based on a mountain of R/D and testing, to be as versatile, repeatable, and effective as possible. OP never observed any issue, or any lack of repeatability. Someone out there may have at some point, and if so email us, we'd love to help you, but search this forum. Person after person have seen the system be bank-vault solid with dependable repeatability and unmatched versatility. That's what we want to see, and we have seen it over and over and over.
So, the suppressor mounts don't interface the taper. Don't think I've ever said they do. They use our Universal Adapter, which ABSOLUTELY uses the taper for the brakes, but are interfacing with the large rear shoulder. They get real close to the taper (more on that later), and it prevents gross misalignment, and helps keep things clean, but the interface for the suppressor adapters is the rear face of the Hellfire Universal Adapter.
The core of the confusion comes from most people thinking that all tapers are the same. This is a point of ignorance that seems to be seeding problems. Basic lesson - there are "steep" tapers and "shallow" tapers both being used in the shooting world. These are separated in the 15*-20* included angle area. Larger angle, and tapers don't really lock. Smaller and they start to lock really hard. Nearly all you see in the consumer/shooting world are "steep" (Sig/Q is a good example at 25*. They are great for creating concentric seals. There are then "shallow" like ours, at 10*, which you'll also find in most of the machining world, and they are meant to create concentric grip. They also create a seal, but grip is the core function.
Remember seal/grip, it's important.
On our adapters the grip is needed to time the brakes we produce. The way those are allowed to work is the collar (this is also important later) pulls directly back on the brake, creating the seating force on the tapers. It's a patented method that works exceptionally well and many of you are customers because of it - thank you for that. The downside to this is that it requires that direct pull-back to get tight. If you tried to thread something onto that in one piece, like it were the Sig/Q or the TBAC or another that uses a taper seal, it would never achieve thread torque as the shallow taper would bite/grip and it would keep you from turning the device enough to create the requisite thread torque.
Our very first can mounts (maybe someone on this thread has one, but probably not, there were only a couple dozen made) actually looked like a Hellfire, with the collar on the rear. These interfaced the taper. The major downfall was the added length of this approach, along with weight and complication. So, like we tend to do, we started working on alternatives and seeing what performed to our liking.
What we landed on is what we have on the market today, with thousands of can mounts in use. It is a system that shoulders on the large square face of the rear threads on the Hellfire adapter, with a small amount (about .005" radial) of clearance at the taper interface. This had shown to us over and over and over to be very repeatable (as long as the can itself and the muzzle threads were true, but nothing in our mount system could possibly solve those issues) as well as shorter, lighter, and realistically more attractive.
We have not changed this design or its manufacturing tolerance since we released it in 2016. This isn't something we randomly did 6 months ago.
ALSO - WORTH NOTING - OP was issued a full refund for every item he wanted to send back. Every piece. We wrote him and mailed him a check about 10 days ago. Satisfaction guaranteed, period, and if he felt like his theoretical knowledge of what was best was more relevant than what we developed, that's perfectly fine.
Any other questions, happy to answer them. I'll pop back on later in the week.
Thank you for the technical explanation, I appreciate those details. I have no dog in the fight here, but perhaps this bullet point on your description for the suppressor mount may be considered misleading. Instead, a bullet point summarizing the above technical explanation should quell any confusion.Unsure why OP didn't just post the email replies I sent to him, would have saved a lot of uninformed time for the forum. Guess I'll basically copy/paste for him. I'll check this one more time in a day or so, but am probably not going to spend a ton of time arguing about the system that has worked for a massive number of people, and is produced based on a mountain of R/D and testing, to be as versatile, repeatable, and effective as possible. OP never observed any issue, or any lack of repeatability. Someone out there may have at some point, and if so email us, we'd love to help you, but search this forum. Person after person have seen the system be bank-vault solid with dependable repeatability and unmatched versatility. That's what we want to see, and we have seen it over and over and over.
So, the suppressor mounts don't interface the taper. Don't think I've ever said they do. They use our Universal Adapter, which ABSOLUTELY uses the taper for the brakes, but are interfacing with the large rear shoulder. They get real close to the taper (more on that later), and it prevents gross misalignment, and helps keep things clean, but the interface for the suppressor adapters is the rear face of the Hellfire Universal Adapter.
The core of the confusion comes from most people thinking that all tapers are the same. This is a point of ignorance that seems to be seeding problems. Basic lesson - there are "steep" tapers and "shallow" tapers both being used in the shooting world. These are separated in the 15*-20* included angle area. Larger angle, and tapers don't really lock. Smaller and they start to lock really hard. Nearly all you see in the consumer/shooting world are "steep" (Sig/Q is a good example at 25*. They are great for creating concentric seals. There are then "shallow" like ours, at 10*, which you'll also find in most of the machining world, and they are meant to create concentric grip. They also create a seal, but grip is the core function.
Remember seal/grip, it's important.
On our adapters the grip is needed to time the brakes we produce. The way those are allowed to work is the collar (this is also important later) pulls directly back on the brake, creating the seating force on the tapers. It's a patented method that works exceptionally well and many of you are customers because of it - thank you for that. The downside to this is that it requires that direct pull-back to get tight. If you tried to thread something onto that in one piece, like it were the Sig/Q or the TBAC or another that uses a taper seal, it would never achieve thread torque as the shallow taper would bite/grip and it would keep you from turning the device enough to create the requisite thread torque.
Our very first can mounts (maybe someone on this thread has one, but probably not, there were only a couple dozen made) actually looked like a Hellfire, with the collar on the rear. These interfaced the taper. The major downfall was the added length of this approach, along with weight and complication. So, like we tend to do, we started working on alternatives and seeing what performed to our liking.
What we landed on is what we have on the market today, with thousands of can mounts in use. It is a system that shoulders on the large square face of the rear threads on the Hellfire adapter, with a small amount (about .005" radial) of clearance at the taper interface. This had shown to us over and over and over to be very repeatable (as long as the can itself and the muzzle threads were true, but nothing in our mount system could possibly solve those issues) as well as shorter, lighter, and realistically more attractive.
We have not changed this design or its manufacturing tolerance since we released it in 2016. This isn't something we randomly did 6 months ago.
ALSO - WORTH NOTING - OP was issued a full refund for every item he wanted to send back. Every piece. We wrote him and mailed him a check about 10 days ago. Satisfaction guaranteed, period, and if he felt like his theoretical knowledge of what was best was more relevant than what we developed, that's perfectly fine.
Any other questions, happy to answer them. I'll pop back on later in the week.
Like the previous couple post said I think the majority of confusion is with the advertising. This screenshot of the universal adapter more accurately shows where it could be confused. Says it works with your suppressor mount then directly below it says it uses tapers and how awesome tapers are.Unsure why OP didn't just post the email replies I sent to him, would have saved a lot of uninformed time for the forum. Guess I'll basically copy/paste for him. I'll check this one more time in a day or so, but am probably not going to spend a ton of time arguing about the system that has worked for a massive number of people, and is produced based on a mountain of R/D and testing, to be as versatile, repeatable, and effective as possible. OP never observed any issue, or any lack of repeatability. Someone out there may have at some point, and if so email us, we'd love to help you, but search this forum. Person after person have seen the system be bank-vault solid with dependable repeatability and unmatched versatility. That's what we want to see, and we have seen it over and over and over.
So, the suppressor mounts don't interface the taper. Don't think I've ever said they do. They use our Universal Adapter, which ABSOLUTELY uses the taper for the brakes, but are interfacing with the large rear shoulder. They get real close to the taper (more on that later), and it prevents gross misalignment, and helps keep things clean, but the interface for the suppressor adapters is the rear face of the Hellfire Universal Adapter.
The core of the confusion comes from most people thinking that all tapers are the same. This is a point of ignorance that seems to be seeding problems. Basic lesson - there are "steep" tapers and "shallow" tapers both being used in the shooting world. These are separated in the 15*-20* included angle area. Larger angle, and tapers don't really lock. Smaller and they start to lock really hard. Nearly all you see in the consumer/shooting world are "steep" (Sig/Q is a good example at 25*. They are great for creating concentric seals. There are then "shallow" like ours, at 10*, which you'll also find in most of the machining world, and they are meant to create concentric grip. They also create a seal, but grip is the core function.
Remember seal/grip, it's important.
On our adapters the grip is needed to time the brakes we produce. The way those are allowed to work is the collar (this is also important later) pulls directly back on the brake, creating the seating force on the tapers. It's a patented method that works exceptionally well and many of you are customers because of it - thank you for that. The downside to this is that it requires that direct pull-back to get tight. If you tried to thread something onto that in one piece, like it were the Sig/Q or the TBAC or another that uses a taper seal, it would never achieve thread torque as the shallow taper would bite/grip and it would keep you from turning the device enough to create the requisite thread torque.
Our very first can mounts (maybe someone on this thread has one, but probably not, there were only a couple dozen made) actually looked like a Hellfire, with the collar on the rear. These interfaced the taper. The major downfall was the added length of this approach, along with weight and complication. So, like we tend to do, we started working on alternatives and seeing what performed to our liking.
What we landed on is what we have on the market today, with thousands of can mounts in use. It is a system that shoulders on the large square face of the rear threads on the Hellfire adapter, with a small amount (about .005" radial) of clearance at the taper interface. This had shown to us over and over and over to be very repeatable (as long as the can itself and the muzzle threads were true, but nothing in our mount system could possibly solve those issues) as well as shorter, lighter, and realistically more attractive.
We have not changed this design or its manufacturing tolerance since we released it in 2016. This isn't something we randomly did 6 months ago.
ALSO - WORTH NOTING - OP was issued a full refund for every item he wanted to send back. Every piece. We wrote him and mailed him a check about 10 days ago. Satisfaction guaranteed, period, and if he felt like his theoretical knowledge of what was best was more relevant than what we developed, that's perfectly fine.
Any other questions, happy to answer them. I'll pop back on later in the week.
Welcome to the party. I think this has been resolvedI ran out of time before reaching the end of this thread and jumped to the end to make this statement. It may have already been made but.... The taper on Area419 products is for ease of indexing your brake. There is no need for indexing a can. The length and weight of the can configuration is greatly reduced by using the system as it is designed. Mine is pure perfection. I can go from can to brake to can in less than a minute and no complicated gadgets. How do you top that?
What these adapters allow you to do is attach myriad products to the end, and it's all based around the idea that the inside geometry of whatever you're mounting matches the external geometry of this universal adapter and it's being secured to those tapers with these rear threads.
What these adapters allow you to do is attach myriad products to the end, and it's all based around the idea that the inside geometry of whatever you're mounting matches the external geometry of this universal adapter and it's being secured to those tapers with these rear threads.
Account was made today, just to post this? Seems someone has a vendetta. Who knows. This is largely why a lot of manufacturers stay away from the forums.Another single serve account.
What is that quote from? Doesn't appear in this thread and couldn't find it on Area419s website or Google as a whole?