Re: bedding problems in heat? (SWMP Article)
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Just read an articel on the Ashbury .338. It said that they went with an aluminum stock because
"fiberglass stock displayed problems with accuracy after rapid fire strings in high heat conditions. The titanium devcon bedding would start to melt"
</div></div>
That article is a bit misleading and doesn't tell the whole story.
The incident they are referring to is when the USMC was having some .338 trials at GunSite during August. Ashbury was running wide open to get a rifle on line for the shoot and their new stock was not quite ready. So they put the gun in a McMillan A5 and used a new bedding compound that was suppossed to be the newest, bestest.
So Ashbury was going to an aluminum stock all along, but at that time it just wasn't ready.
The fiberglass stock never had any issues. The new bedding compound did. It had a meltdown in the heat. I cannot confirm whether it was Titanium Devcon but I do know that the material was new to the users and done in a hurry.
The problem referrenced in the article was due to un-tested methods and materials used in their test gun. In fact another, similar rifle was used at the last minute for their actual shooting demo. That rifle had the same type A5 stock but bedded with proven bedding compounds. It never exhibited any issues and completed their demo wonderfully. This string of events could have happened to anybody under the circumstances. Ashbury had a Plan B and it worked out for them.
Even if the fiberglass stock and bedding had worked perfectly in the heat, they were already on track to move to the current aluminum chassis that they had heavily invested in. If anyone has info to the contrary, please share.
This is not a knock on Ashbury or their product. Both are top shelf. Rather it should be a reminder to not take everything printed in a gun magazine as the gospel.