I thought this was pretty funny. I live in MA, and on another forum for New England, a user asked for a recommendation for a rifle since he wanted to get into precision shooting at longer ranges. By that he meant 100 yards to 300 yards, which is pretty much the most distance you can find around here. There are only a few ranges that go to 500 or 600 yards, so he wanted to start at 100 and work his way to 300, and then perhaps beyond if possible. Anyway, he asked about Remingtons and Savages in .308, and guys responded saying those were good rifles, and which particular model he might like.
Then one guy responded recommending that a .50 Barrett was what he might need.
So I responded that that was not what he would need, due to extra costs (ammo hard to get here) and just added recoil/noise making it harder to work on fundamentals. Well, a "discussion" ensued, in which that recommended said .50 was actually great for a beginner, and shoots to 500 yards "out of the box" (whatever that means) and is quite accurate. He then called me a FUDD for not liking the .50.
Am I not taking my retard pills or something? What the heck is wrong people making these types recommendations? I mean, a .50 for a beginner at 100 to 300 yards?! I wouldn't have even recommended .338 to the guy since he was just getting started and no need to spend all that extra money on ammo, instead .308 is cheaper so he can practice more.
Was I wrong to practically get a nose bleed from that recommendation?
http://www.northeastshooters.com/vbulletin/threads/154416-Long-Range-Rifle-Question
Then one guy responded recommending that a .50 Barrett was what he might need.
So I responded that that was not what he would need, due to extra costs (ammo hard to get here) and just added recoil/noise making it harder to work on fundamentals. Well, a "discussion" ensued, in which that recommended said .50 was actually great for a beginner, and shoots to 500 yards "out of the box" (whatever that means) and is quite accurate. He then called me a FUDD for not liking the .50.
Am I not taking my retard pills or something? What the heck is wrong people making these types recommendations? I mean, a .50 for a beginner at 100 to 300 yards?! I wouldn't have even recommended .338 to the guy since he was just getting started and no need to spend all that extra money on ammo, instead .308 is cheaper so he can practice more.
Was I wrong to practically get a nose bleed from that recommendation?
http://www.northeastshooters.com/vbulletin/threads/154416-Long-Range-Rifle-Question