Hi there,
I'm looking to get into the world of precision shooting and have narrowed my choice of rifle down to two options. On the Bergara side, I really like the stock, premier action, cerakote finish, sub-moa guarantee, and triggertech trigger of the HMR Pro. It seems like an excellent, almost custom quality rifle that has everything I want out of the box. That said, while most Bergara reviews are positive, I read a post where a precision rifle instructor mentioned they have a number of issues when being ran hard. In addition, another poster mentioned that the bolt on his regular HMR broke off twice. I'm not sure if this issue extends to the HMR pro, as the action is more robust, but it is concerning nonetheless. It seems like the almost custom level of craftmanship of the HMR pro would absolve it of having these issues common with the mass production B-14 HMR. On the other hand, I understand that many of these issues don't exist with the Tikka, but the poor factory stock will require that I purchase a new stock or chassis, which will likely be a KRG X-Ray. With the Tikka, I just don't see the same level of detail or almost custom level of craftmanship that exists with the HMR Pro. With all of this in consideration, what is the better option here? An HMR Pro or TIkka CTR in an X-Ray chassis? Am I too biased towards the HMR Pro? Or are my views on these rifles and their differences fairly accurate?
I'm looking to get into the world of precision shooting and have narrowed my choice of rifle down to two options. On the Bergara side, I really like the stock, premier action, cerakote finish, sub-moa guarantee, and triggertech trigger of the HMR Pro. It seems like an excellent, almost custom quality rifle that has everything I want out of the box. That said, while most Bergara reviews are positive, I read a post where a precision rifle instructor mentioned they have a number of issues when being ran hard. In addition, another poster mentioned that the bolt on his regular HMR broke off twice. I'm not sure if this issue extends to the HMR pro, as the action is more robust, but it is concerning nonetheless. It seems like the almost custom level of craftmanship of the HMR pro would absolve it of having these issues common with the mass production B-14 HMR. On the other hand, I understand that many of these issues don't exist with the Tikka, but the poor factory stock will require that I purchase a new stock or chassis, which will likely be a KRG X-Ray. With the Tikka, I just don't see the same level of detail or almost custom level of craftmanship that exists with the HMR Pro. With all of this in consideration, what is the better option here? An HMR Pro or TIkka CTR in an X-Ray chassis? Am I too biased towards the HMR Pro? Or are my views on these rifles and their differences fairly accurate?