Biden pardons Mark Milley, Anthony Fauci, J6 committee members

One last go fuck yourself from joe

IMG_7541.png
 
Mike Flynn and Roger Stone (and Paul Manafort, etc...) are guilty of actual crimes though- specifically High Treason.

Anthony Fauci is "guilty" of leading Operation Warp Speed- which saved the human race from a global viral pandemic.

Mark Milley is guilty of serving as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
What exactly was Mike Flynn's crime? Cause Fauci lied directly to congress on multiple occasions about what they knew about the origins of Covid and who was funding it. Do you even know what Mike Flynn "did"?

Stop being such an idiot, its unbecoming of this website. Go somewhere more your speed, like Reddit or Tik Tok.
 
Mike Flynn and Roger Stone (and Paul Manafort, etc...) are guilty of actual crimes though- specifically High Treason.

Anthony Fauci is "guilty" of leading Operation Warp Speed- which saved the human race from a global viral pandemic.

Mark Milley is guilty of serving as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Wow..... that is a whole bunch of stupid all rolled up in a nice package. Please stop sharing your retarded ramblings.
 
They're immune from prosecution.

So subpoena their asses to testify about what occurred and name names... Names of people who weren't on the pardon list.

They can't incriminate themselves due to the pardon... So pleading the 5th won't work.

If they refuse to show up or testify, then break an obstruction charge off in their asses... They weren't pardoned for that.

Mike
 
Another thing to consider...

A lot of people had their lives ruined by Fauci and his cronies. Most people would be reasonably satisfied if he was prosecuted and received some kind of punishment for it.

That's off the table now.

So there may be someone out there with an axe to grind that has no official channel for that.

Tony the weasel should consider not going out in public... Ever. Somebody might seek satisfaction from extralegal means.

Mike
 
Mike Flynn and Roger Stone (and Paul Manafort, etc...) are guilty of actual crimes though- specifically High Treason.

Anthony Fauci is "guilty" of leading Operation Warp Speed- which saved the human race from a global viral pandemic.

Mark Milley is guilty of serving as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Love me some ignore button🥰
 

There are several reasons to expect that a broad pre-emptive pardon would be held invalid. A pardon which doesn’t specify in sufficient detail the offenses pardoned conflicts with the notion that accepting a pardon is an implicit admission of guilt. It is hard to say that a person who has accepted a pardon for any offense he or she may have committed has admitted guilt to an offense when we don’t know what wrongful behavior has been acknowledged.
 
It only reinforces that they were guilty of something to begin with.

Demoncrats will just say that Trump was going to persecute them politically etc. While Trump and everybody are criminals. In fact we’ll probably have at least 1-2 paid trolls saying that up in here.
 
Who cares..they weren’t going to jail anyway.

This is the best case possible

Now the far right conservatives can’t hold “prosecute or I won’t vote” BS like those hypocrites always do.

The sooner the last 4 years vanish the sooner Trump can hopefully focus on hopefully pushing through 30% of what he wants to.

There won’t be every news organization saying he’s going for revenge or he’s bitter which will turn the middle against him after 18 months.

Nope just moving forward and leaving you behind
 
  • Like
Reactions: BCP
Biden pardoned Dr. Anthony Fauci, Gen. Mark Milley (Ret.), and others who some speculated may have faced investigations under the incoming Trump administration on Monday.

Biden's pardons come just hours before he is set to depart the White House and President-elect Trump takes the oath of office once again. The pardon also applies to a litany of people involved in the January 6 select committee investigation.

In addition to the named individuals, the pardon applies to, "Members of Congress and staff who served on the Select Committee, and the U.S. Capitol and D.C. Metropolitan police officers who testified before the Select Committee."

Notably, Special Counsel Jack Smith, former FBI Director Christopher Wray and Attorney General Merrick Garland are not included in the pardon, despite speculation that they may face backlash from the incoming administration.

Thought they didn’t do anything wrong 😡
HELL is waiting for them 👺
 
Mike Flynn and Roger Stone (and Paul Manafort, etc...) are guilty of actual crimes though- specifically High Treason.

Anthony Fauci is "guilty" of leading Operation Warp Speed- which saved the human race from a global viral pandemic.

Mark Milley is guilty of serving as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Anthony Fauci is guilty of helping fund, manufacture and then unleash a global viral pandemic.There fixed it for you.
 
Another thing to consider...

A lot of people had their lives ruined by Fauci and his cronies. Most people would be reasonably satisfied if he was prosecuted and received some kind of punishment for it.

That's off the table now.

So there may be someone out there with an axe to grind that has no official channel for that.

Tony the weasel should consider not going out in public... Ever. Somebody might seek satisfaction from extralegal means.

Mike
Exactly. I dont think only helathcare CEOs are in harms way.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: OkieMike and 232593
Got a question …probably already posted ??

Seeing as Joe & handlers pardoned people that are innocent 😅
How can someone that is senile, pardon people when he has 0 clue WTF is going on ? Literally 🤔
Hasn’t anybody thought about that ?
He couldn’t stand to go to trial because of his mental state , BUT he can have people pardoned . Don’t get it. Everything he signed should be null and void. 🫤
 
Last edited:
Got a question …probably already posted ??

Seeing as Joe & handlers pardoned people than innocent 😅
How can someone that is senile, pardon people when he has 0 clue WTF is going on ? Literally 🤔
Hasn’t anybody thought about that ?
He couldn’t stand to go to trial because of his mental state , BUT he can have people pardoned . Don’t get it. Everything he signed should be null and void. 🫤
lots of people wondering about the same thing.

 
lots of people wondering about the same thing.

These pardons are crazy and make no sense.
It’s not like they are free from paying parking tickets ….these are Full Blown Traitors 🤨
If they let this shit slide , says a lot about things. No Bueno in my book 👎
Why wasn’t Ghislaine Maxwell pardoned ?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 6/250/40
I'm all for wasting the money and prosecuting them anyway.

Also for prosecuting some folks for elder abuse, whomever's been giving him these things to sign.
It’s not possible to commit elderly abuse on a traitor and a pedophile.



Council for a Livable World was and is a Soviet front designed to steer campaign financing and policy in favor of the Soviet Union/Russia. One of their strategies was to influence elections in small States where their money could go further in tipping the scales in favor of a stooge on Soviet payroll.

This is how Biden was elected in 1972 into the US Senate, having never been a Congressman before, and very young for a Senator (34 during the campaign, turned 35 after the election in December).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandhog308

That's exactly what I've been pondering with this topic- (1) can a pardon be issued without a charge, I'm not a lawyer but it seems like a judge ruling a dismal of charges prior to even a docket number being assigned and (2) I wonder if there's a legal precedent on whether limitations exist on what the executive branch is permitted to pardon. As an example, is there a threshold, such as crimes against the state (not sure if that's the correct terminology) such as treasonous acts against the nation that surpasses the ability for a president to pardon. And (3) if there is some sort of legal "conflict of interest" precedent in (a) excusing oneself and immediate family members and (b) when issuing a pardon in, for lack of better words, would the same conflict exist or preclude one from providing one with legal standing to other parties when they/themselves are involved in the same (either alleged, proven, or ruled upon) criminal activity?

I don't know how much weight the screenshot you posted carries as far as being legalistically correct/accurate but it precisely speaks to what I've been pondering. Without a formal charge- to a layman such as myself that is, a preemptive pardon before a charge has occurred is by it's nature a de facto ruling from the executive branch that said parties are exempted from any legal actions (essentially beyond reproach/above the law of the land) and would set up what could very likely be a lengthy legal review of constitutional law and the separation of powers between the legislative, executive and judicial branches.

With that said- these are some very... interesting I'll say, times we are in with the proliferation of lawfare.

-LD
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Sandhog308
That's exactly what I've been pondering with this topic- (1) can a pardon be issued without a charge, I'm not a lawyer but it seems like a judge ruling a dismal of charges prior to even a docket number being assigned and (2) I wonder if there's a legal precedent on whether limitations exist on what the executive branch is permitted to pardon. As an example, is there a threshold, such as crimes against the state (not sure if that's the correct terminology) such as treasonous acts against the nation that surpasses the ability for a president to pardon. And (3) if there is some sort of legal "conflict of interest" precedent in (a) excusing oneself and immediate family members and (b) when issuing a pardon in, for lack of better words, would the same conflict exist or preclude one from providing one with legal standing to other parties is they/themselves are involved in the same (either alleged, proven, or ruled upon) criminal activity?

I don't know how much weight the screenshot you posted carries as far as being legalistically correct/accurate but it precisely speaks to what I've been pondering. Without a formal charge- to a layman such as myself that is, a preemptive pardon before a charge has occurred is by it's nature a de facto ruling from the executive branch that said parties are exempted from any legal actions (essentially beyond reproach/above the law of the land) and would set up what could very likely be a lengthy legal review of constitutional law and the separation of powers between the legislative, executive and judicial branches.

With that said- these are some very... interesting I'll say, times we are in with the proliferation of lawfare.

-LD
In addition, can a guy who wasn’t able to be prosecuted himself for being old and senile hand out valid orders, pardons, etc?
Who has been pulling the strings? Can they be prosecuted?
 
The other benefit to this is after a pardon, you are stripped of your 5th Amendment right not to incriminate yourself. You can't incriminate yourself when you are pardoned. So they have to be forthright and 100 percent honest in any testimony.

And you know what... if they aren't, they weren't pardoned for Perjury. Legal minds better than mine (I didn't even stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night) can comment with more authority. But yes! BRING ON THE INVESTIGATIONS and show how corrupt they were. And then get them and their minions. The minions on things they weren't pardoned for. The bosses on the technicalities.

If you can put Capone away for life for tax evasion... you can nail these shitbags into Supemax for purjury.

Or... they weren't pardoned in Japan or India. How about letting India or Japan prosecute them for mass murder? I mean, those places are way ahead of us in looking at the 'facts.' Fauci can get extradited to a third world country and tried for genocide and crimes against humanity there! I bet an Indian Prison is a really great place to spend your retirement...

Sirhr

No pardon but this is hopefully waiting for you.

View attachment 8596573
Are the American people thinking this is enough for the crimes committed?

I hope the American people wake the fuck up. Most corrupt administration in history of USA. Nothing more than a puppet government was the 46th "POTUS" in name only.

If this doesn't prove everything was a complete lie, nothing does. COVID, Jan 6, etc, etc, etc.
Yeah but ASGH…

They're immune from prosecution.

So subpoena their asses to testify about what occurred and name names... Names of people who weren't on the pardon list.

They can't incriminate themselves due to the pardon... So pleading the 5th won't work.

If they refuse to show up or testify, then break an obstruction charge off in their asses... They weren't pardoned for that.

Mike
What makes you think they will be encouraged to tell the truth even tho they could and get away with it?

Freaking banana republic shitshow
Bingo. Welcome aboard my friend. Only gonna get worse.

They can still be prosecuted by States and they can be hauled before Congress by subpoena and if they lie before Congress, prosecuted for that.
Yeah but we know that won’t happen.

These pardons are crazy and make no sense.
It’s not like they are free from paying parking tickets ….these are Full Blown Traitors 🤨
If they let this shit slide , says a lot about things. No Bueno in my book 👎
Why wasn’t Ghislaine Maxwell pardoned ?
See post about banana republic. Only gonna get worse.,


That's exactly what I've been pondering with this topic- (1) can a pardon be issued without a charge, I'm not a lawyer but it seems like a judge ruling a dismal of charges prior to even a docket number being assigned and (2) I wonder if there's a legal precedent on whether limitations exist on what the executive branch is permitted to pardon. As an example, is there a threshold, such as crimes against the state (not sure if that's the correct terminology) such as treasonous acts against the nation that surpasses the ability for a president to pardon. And (3) if there is some sort of legal "conflict of interest" precedent in (a) excusing oneself and immediate family members and (b) when issuing a pardon in, for lack of better words, would the same conflict exist or preclude one from providing one with legal standing to other parties is they/themselves are involved in the same (either alleged, proven, or ruled upon) criminal activity?

I don't know how much weight the screenshot you posted carries as far as being legalistically correct/accurate but it precisely speaks to what I've been pondering. Without a formal charge- to a layman such as myself that is, a preemptive pardon before a charge has occurred is by it's nature a de facto ruling from the executive branch that said parties are exempted from any legal actions (essentially beyond reproach/above the law of the land) and would set up what could very likely be a lengthy legal review of constitutional law and the separation of powers between the legislative, executive and judicial branches.

With that said- these are some very... interesting I'll say, times we are in with the proliferation of lawfare.

-LD
No, these are terrible times. Gov is a massive failure and it’s time for the people to take back control.