Biden pardons Mark Milley, Anthony Fauci, J6 committee members

I have questions that I know my one of my brethren on SH will have the answer. If Biden’s pardons of the J6 committee are an acceptance of guilt as determined by a 1914 SCOTUS, can they all be sued by those in jail for violation of their civil rights and liberties? Or sued in civil court for damages like the Nicole Brown family did with OJ?
 
Are the American people thinking this is enough for the crimes committed?


Yeah but ASGH…


What makes you think they will be encouraged to tell the truth even tho they could and get away with it?


Bingo. Welcome aboard my friend. Only gonna get worse.


Yeah but we know that won’t happen.


See post about banana republic. Only gonna get worse.,




No, these are terrible times. Gov is a massive failure and it’s time for the people to take back control.
I'll only speak to the one section you quoted me on- I'm more than willing to amend my statement from 'interesting times' to 'trying times' but I still honestly believe that in our short span as a nation, we've been through harder and worse times and we prevailed and were able to move into prosperous times.

Call me an optimist but to this point, I haven't quite given up and hope that today marks the day that the pendulum swings back and moves away from what I perceive to be rampant as well as blatant corruption of our government & the elected officials that make up that entity.

I've shared my thoughts on the matter here on many different threads and what I've continued to say lately, and what I still believe to be as true, is now that Trump is back I believe he has until mid-terms (so 2 years) to start "righting the ship". And maybe he can and maybe he can't but before I consider 'all to be lost' I'm anxiously waiting to see what he's able to do. So far, it looks like we're starting off strong and I hope his administration is able to continue that momentum and above everything else- I hope that the last 4 years has provided enough evidence (that didn't exist between 2016-2020) to bring this corruption to light.

We know the playbook, we know the players, and I have to believe they got cocky and, in turn, got sloppy. I just hope that advantage is realized and pursued through airtight and legal means to start introducing accountability for the corruption I perceive. And... maybe I'm wrong and misread things and I'm just basing my opinions/perception off of a bias- if that's the case then so be it.
 
The extent of these pardons just shows how deep the corruption in our government is buried. If you have to pardon staffers and SS officers it's really bad. The effort to over throw the US government was/is well planned and is ongoing.

This needs to be dug into very deeply to see who is leading this change and see to it that they are "removed". Assets confiscated and families eliminated. The evil must be dealt with or it will continue.
Removed? You could eliminate every single government employee and the elected representation and it wouldn't be eliminated. There's tens of thousands in the NGOs in around the beltway that run our country.
 
The look you have when you didn't get a free pardon.

1737429929776.png
 
I'll only speak to the one section you quoted me on- I'm more than willing to amend my statement from 'interesting times' to 'trying times' but I still honestly believe that in our short span as a nation, we've been through harder and worse times and we prevailed and were able to move into prosperous times.

Call me an optimist but to this point, I haven't quite given up and hope that today marks the day that the pendulum swings back and moves away from what I perceive to be rampant as well as blatant corruption of our government & the elected officials that make up that entity.

I've shared my thoughts on the matter here on many different threads and what I've continued to say lately, and what I still believe to be as true, is now that Trump is back I believe he has until mid-terms (so 2 years) to start "righting the ship". And maybe he can and maybe he can't but before I consider 'all to be lost' I'm anxiously waiting to see what he's able to do. So far, it looks like we're starting off strong and I hope his administration is able to continue that momentum and above everything else- I hope that the last 4 years has provided enough evidence (that didn't exist between 2016-2020) to bring this corruption to light.

We know the playbook, we know the players, and I have to believe they got cocky and, in turn, got sloppy. I just hope that advantage is realized and pursued through airtight and legal means to start introducing accountability for the corruption I perceive. And... maybe I'm wrong and misread things and I'm just basing my opinions/perception off of a bias- if that's the case then so be it.
Yes, but what difference will it make when America ejects these traitor types again in 4 years because they have short term memories? Keep in mind that at least 74mil people think these corrupt people are in the right and that the current admin is the evil ones. I don’t know how you walk back from that. America is too polarized on ideologies at the moment and based on current trends, the generational change is not going in our favor. So have lots of kids, raise them right, mentor others and maybe just maybe we can all come to the middle again. But as long as this type of lawlessness is allowed to go on without repercussions then I never see this meeting in the middle again ever coming to fruition.
 
Yes, but what difference will it make when America ejects these traitor types again in 4 years because they have short term memories? Keep in mind that at least 74mil people think these corrupt people are in the right and that the current admin is the evil ones. I don’t know how you walk back from that. America is too polarized on ideologies at the moment and based on current trends, the generational change is not going in our favor. So have lots of kids, raise them right, mentor others and maybe just maybe we can all come to the middle again. But as long as this type of lawlessness is allowed to go on without repercussions then I never see this meeting in the middle again ever coming to fruition.
I really do "catch what you're throwing" and would humbly suggest that on this topic you & I in particular are likely over 90% in agreement here. I just didn't want to lose sight of that from the get-go.

When it comes to the legal precedents I mentioned- I would "argue" that hashing that out actually might make quite a bit of difference moving forward. It might not have the same outcome either of us are envisioning though. If you're looking for the "usual suspects" to be held accountable and thrown into prison as a result of their actions that (in my opinion at least likely span decades) then that might not be the likely outcome.

However- if these pardons are challenged (I think I previously mentioned it'd likely go on for years if it's argued from a constitutional angle) there might be a silver lining for our and our children's futures though. Again- I'm not a lawyer and I didn't even sleep in a Holiday Inn last night but this is what I'm mulling over with this and the precedent it sets.

If a sitting president is able to issue pardons to themselves, their immediate family members, and everyone (perhaps a slight exaggeration so I'll caveat it as perceived "ring leaders") that 'may' all be involved in criminal actions against our nation, by hashing it out, we may be able to prevent this from every occurring again (especially when things can get even arguably worse).

I won't speak for anyone but myself- but one of the ways that I see it (again as a layperson, just your average Joe 6-pack who pays his taxes and votes), if these pardons aren't overturned then the ramifications of which allow a sitting US President to commit abject and obvious treason in direct and willful violations of their oaths of office and in direct violation of the US Constitution and then have a precedent established (due to these last minute pardons) to protect themselves and all coconspirators from any ramifications with a single stroke of a pen (even if the clear and abject treason has yet to be realized).

I likely didn't elaborate that point in my previous post (I tend to catch a lot of flak here for being too long winded by sharing too many details) but that's what's sticking in my head as far as it being "interesting" on how this will play out. If these pardons are upheld, then I'm off my rocker and my concerns are completely without merit or all is lost with the checks and balances and separation of duties our nation was founded upon.

As for how we walk back form that- well, all I can say is in my mind we have to start walking back one step at a time. We need to address the hysteria that the previous administration put into place, we need to curtail and prevent this from ever occurring again, we need to restore faith and confidence in our electoral process, and we need to bring to light all of the actions and the entities behind such that have done everything thing they could to circumvent our lawful nation and put further measures/protections in place to stop those from repeating.

I'm not sure if I addressed all of your comments but hopefully I touched on many of them and presented a counterpoint or agreement to your position in a respectful but also concise & clear way. Just to "book-end" things, again I would like to reiterate that you & I are likely more than 90% in agreement with things. The <10% is just on how we perceive/interpret it and how we move forward is all.

Cheers to you and best wishes.

-LD
 
I really do "catch what you're throwing" and would humbly suggest that on this topic you & I in particular are likely over 90% in agreement here. I just didn't want to lose sight of that from the get-go.

When it comes to the legal precedents I mentioned- I would "argue" that hashing that out actually might make quite a bit of difference moving forward. It might not have the same outcome either of us are envisioning though. If you're looking for the "usual suspects" to be held accountable and thrown into prison as a result of their actions that (in my opinion at least likely span decades) then that might not be the likely outcome.

However- if these pardons are challenged (I think I previously mentioned it'd likely go on for years if it's argued from a constitutional angle) there might be a silver lining for our and our children's futures though. Again- I'm not a lawyer and I didn't even sleep in a Holiday Inn last night but this is what I'm mulling over with this and the precedent it sets.

If a sitting president is able to issue pardons to themselves, their immediate family members, and everyone (perhaps a slight exaggeration so I'll caveat it as perceived "ring leaders") that 'may' all be involved in criminal actions against our nation, by hashing it out, we may be able to prevent this from every occurring again (especially when things can get even arguably worse).

I won't speak for anyone but myself- but one of the ways that I see it (again as a layperson, just your average Joe 6-pack who pays his taxes and votes), if these pardons aren't overturned then the ramifications of which allow a sitting US President to commit abject and obvious treason in direct and willful violations of their oaths of office and in direct violation of the US Constitution and then have a precedent established (due to these last minute pardons) to protect themselves and all coconspirators from any ramifications with a single stroke of a pen (even if the clear and abject treason has yet to be realized).

I likely didn't elaborate that point in my previous post (I tend to catch a lot of flak here for being too long winded by sharing too many details) but that's what's sticking in my head as far as it being "interesting" on how this will play out. If these pardons are upheld, then I'm off my rocker and my concerns are completely without merit or all is lost with the checks and balances and separation of duties our nation was founded upon.

As for how we walk back form that- well, all I can say is in my mind we have to start walking back one step at a time. We need to address the hysteria that the previous administration put into place, we need to curtail and prevent this from ever occurring again, we need to restore faith and confidence in our electoral process, and we need to bring to light all of the actions and the entities behind such that have done everything thing they could to circumvent our lawful nation and put further measures/protections in place to stop those from repeating.

I'm not sure if I addressed all of your comments but hopefully I touched on many of them and presented a counterpoint or agreement to your position in a respectful but also concise & clear way. Just to "book-end" things, again I would like to reiterate that you & I are likely more than 90% in agreement with things. The <10% is just on how we perceive/interpret it and how we move forward is all.

Cheers to you and best wishes.

-LD
Here is the thing and part of the issue that the previous admin capitalized on. The constitution is just a document. It matters little if nobody enforces it. The USSC can rule all they want, and they have. And, in some cases their rulings were ignored. Nothing and I mean nothing matters, if we don’t get back to some semblance of law and order and for that to happen, someone has to enforce the laws without bias and the laws cannot be changed on a whim. This gets back to the basics. It’s all spelled out, the laws already exist, we just have to have good people enforce them.
 
Here is the thing and part of the issue that the previous admin capitalized on. The constitution is just a document. It matters little if nobody enforces it. The USSC can rule all they want, and they have. And, in some cases their rulings were ignored. Nothing and I mean nothing matters, if we don’t get back to some semblance of law and order and for that to happen, someone has to enforce the laws without bias and the laws cannot be changed on a whim. This gets back to the basics. It’s all spelled out, the laws already exist, we just have to have good people enforce them.
Again- I hear you. This would be part of that 90%+ you and I are in complete agreement with. But at the end of the day- a constitution is and always will be a piece of paper and as you aptly pointed out- it's meaning/weight/value is only as good as its enforcement and the people that are entrusted to do so.

That fact is no different today in 2025 than it was when it was ratified in 1787. If I remember my history correctly (please feel free to correct me as I rather the right information be shared than myself being "right") but I believe that Benjamin Franklin is credited with the response when asked about what we, as a newly founded country were even given when the constitution was ratified of saying "A republic, if you can keep it".

I think I'm right/accurate on the details there but if I'm proven to be a little foggy- the gist I'm getting at is that our nation, our republic is and always has been fragile and dependent upon those entrusted to maintain its integrity.

Not trying to be argumentative with you personally either, just attempting to perhaps provide a little more clarity on my thoughts/position on this discussion between us is all.

-LD
 
Last edited:
Again- I hear you. This would be part of that 90%+ you and I are in complete agreement with. But at the end of the day- a constitution is and always will be a piece of paper and as you aptly pointed out- it's meaning/weight/value is only as good as it's enforcement and the people that are entrusted to do so.

That fact is no different today in 2025 than it was when it was ratified in 1787. If I remember my history correctly (please feel free to correct me as I rather the right information be shared than myself being "right") but I believe that Benjamin Franklin is credited with the response when asked about what we, as a newly founded country were even when the constitution was ratified of saying "A republic, if you can keep it".

I think I'm right/accurate on the details there but if I'm proven to be a little foggy- the gist I'm getting at is that our nation, our republic is and always has been fragile and dependent upon those entrusted to maintain its integrity.

Not trying to be argumentative with you personally either, just attempting to perhaps provide a little more clarity on my thoughts/position on this discussion between us is all.

-LD
Spot on. Our entire gov hinges on good people doing the right thing. This is the first time in history, that I’m aware of, where all the checks and balances were completely undermined. And if it’s not going as it’s supposed to be, it’s the duty of the people to abolish it and replace it. Or, in this case reinstitute it. We are and have been, in the giving it a chance corrective phase , but notice my wording and call above.
 
Spot on. Our entire gov hinges on good people doing the right thing. This is the first time in history, that I’m aware of, where all the checks and balances were completely undermined. And if it’s not going as it’s supposed to be, it’s the duty of the people to abolish it and replace it. Or, in this case reinstitute it. We are and have been, in the giving it a chance corrective phase , but notice my wording and call above.
I can't find faults in your words. What bothers me- or more accurately differentiates this particular moment in American history for me at least, is unlike the other struggles and tremulous times we're currently facing as opposed to those of our past is this appears to be more of a global struggle rather than internal/within our borders.

I suppose I need to recognize that the world has changed in that regard and we're going to see a lot more of these struggles at the macro/global level but I remain hopeful (at least for the next 2 years) that we're getting the right people in those positions of power to stabilize what we've been seeing/experiencing.

Time will tell and until proven wrong I'll try to hold onto some optimism but until then- I really do appreciate the civil discussion we've had and extend the kindest wishes to you & your family.

-LD
 
  • Like
Reactions: SilentStalkr
Pretty amazing and says a whole lot when you pardon the prosecutors but not the prosecuted.
This move by biden was a horse-trade in a way in exchange for the below 👇 all these politicians talk about give and take ("if you want to do that, I'll do this.... etc)


All J6'rs pardoned and all pending cases ordered to be dropped.

 
Fellas, the writing has been on the wall for a while.

It isn't going to swing the other way and improve. The next 4 years may be a reprieve and we may see some small improvement in places. But the America we all grew up in is gone. And it will never be like it was then.

I wish Trump, Musk, RFK, jr., and the rest all the best of luck. But the swamp doesn't want to be drained.

Take the next 4 years (if it lasts that long) as a blessing and use it to prepare... Or continue to prepare. Because it's going to tip over big time when it finally tips.

Mike
 
Fellas, the writing has been on the wall for a while.

It isn't going to swing the other way and improve. The next 4 years may be a reprieve and we may see some small improvement in places. But the America we all grew up in is gone. And it will never be like it was then.

I wish Trump, Musk, RFK, jr., and the rest all the best of luck. But the swamp doesn't want to be drained.

Take the next 4 years (if it lasts that long) as a blessing and use it to prepare... Or continue to prepare. Because it's going to tip over big time when it finally tips.

Mike
Agreed.

DC jail still has not released pardoned people they are holdl. While others pardoned and incarcerated in Pennsylvania are already in DC outside the jail waiting for there brothers to be released.


Are we surprised?
 
Yes, but what difference will it make when America ejects these traitor types again in 4 years because they have short term memories? Keep in mind that at least 74mil people think these corrupt people are in the right and that the current admin is the evil ones. I don’t know how you walk back from that. America is too polarized on ideologies at the moment and based on current trends, the generational change is not going in our favor. So have lots of kids, raise them right, mentor others and maybe just maybe we can all come to the middle again. But as long as this type of lawlessness is allowed to go on without repercussions then I never see this meeting in the middle again ever coming to fruition.
Generation X's children tipped it for Trump, because they are being raised as conservatives. We who jumped the creek on our bikes, drank from the hose, and let ourselves in and made our own snack after school are doing it right. I know my kid is right wing AF, but also knows how to pretend to be woke to get good grades.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SilentStalkr
Generation X's children tipped it for Trump, because they are being raised as conservatives. We who jumped the creek on our bikes, drank from the hose, and let ourselves in and made our own snack after school are doing it right. I know my kid is right wing AF, but also knows how to pretend to be woke to get good grades.
Same! When they come home and talk about friends that say Joe is cool or Trump bad, I take note and correct them. I used to tell them they don’t need to hang out with those people, but I don’t do that anymore, make sure I keep Intel coming in.
 
I have questions that I know my one of my brethren on SH will have the answer. If Biden’s pardons of the J6 committee are an acceptance of guilt as determined by a 1914 SCOTUS, can they all be sued by those in jail for violation of their civil rights and liberties? Or sued in civil court for damages like the Nicole Brown family did with OJ?
It was not a "determination" per se. it was part of an opinion stating why (amongst other things) a person can reject a pardon; a pardon is not mandatory and can be declined. Acceptance is not an absolute admission of guilt.

"Justice Joseph McKenna delivered the opinion of the Court in favor of Burdick. The Court ruled Burdick was entitled to reject the pardon for a number of reasons, including the implicit admission of guilt and possibly objectionable terms contained in a conditional pardon. As Burdick was entitled to reject the pardon, he was also entitled to assert his right against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment.

Although the Supreme Court's opinion stated that a pardon carries "an imputation of guilt and acceptance of a confession of it," this was part of the Court's dictum for the case. Whether the acceptance of a pardon constitutes an admission of guilt by the recipient is disputed. In Lorance v. Commandant, USDB (2021) the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that "there is no confession and Lorance does not otherwise lose his right to petition for habeas corpus relief for his court-martial conviction and sentence. The case was remanded for further action not inconsistent with the court’s opinion."