I'm pretty sure American gun owners live in America. So, he's gonna nuke his own tax base and supply infrastructure? Or is there a new kinda warhead that targets individuals?
Biden Reminds Gun Owners the Government Has Nuclear Weapons
- Thread starter Davo308
- Start date
I'm pretty sure American gun owners live in America. So, he's gonna nuke his own tax base and supply infrastructure? Or is there a new kinda warhead that targets individuals?
Not if you're a Texan. Pic of my buddy with his Czech Aero L-39 Light Ground Attack Fighter
I know guys who forge their own shit.
The Government cannot stop it.
What I can find online is vague as shit. SHOCKING.
There is almost NOTHING we cannot own last I checked-so fuck them. Twice. In their Sleepy public assholes.
Twice.
I am am really done with this bullshit.
Keep talking assholes. Keep talking. You are waking the sheep, bitches. Wakey-wakey. I'm sure you'll love how that shit turns out for ya.
Sorry bro, even if you're rocking a tactical kilt, underwear isn't allowed. It goes against some kind of Highlander rule.
That is gorgeous. I fixed a 67 fuga supermajester for a guy once and got to go for the ride of my life, your buddies is nicer though.
I like your positive attitude but what happened to the skank that committed GTA and stole your car and all your shit?
I thought a couple dozen guys in bearskins and horns just came a cunt hair away from taking over the government, and they were unarmed. Color me confused.
Forward to 25 minutes. Civil war 30 lb Parrot.
A 30 lb cast iron shell will crack open a lot of ‘armor’ like a sledge hammer on a walnut.
Just Sayin.
Sirhr
I called my insurance company after i had the beers and cancelled my policy, then called the place i bought it from and explained the predicament and said i would double their repo fee if they got it back for me. I still have the car out of spite lol, she got the shit... i learned not to mess with mormon chicks.
Yeah-no.
Not sure if you are trying to play per capita game or what...
Chicago is fucked beyond the Middle East. WAY beyond.
Until you lived in either (or both)-Texas for it's faults, not even close IMO.
When you stack the people up on top of each other and run the plantation for votes-pretty damn horrendous. First hand account.
We can play how bad are they with numbers all day.
Texas is a Utopia compared to ONE city in a state, like Chicago. One city. One. Which other state is accounted for by ONE city?
They should own this fully. An opinion. Gonna laugh and watch them burn it to the ground-they are too stupid to stop it at this point.
Fuck 'em.
How about some canister? The brigade shotgun!
There is a reason it’s called Picketts Charge, not Picketts triumph.
Sirhr
There is a reason it’s called Picketts Charge, not Picketts triumph.
Sirhr
I just checked this, initially not believing it, and it is true. But I agree with you it is not an issue of causation. High murder rates and high organized inner city crime seem to be the strongest correlation.
LOL-my broken ass Nam Arty brother would love ya.
Silly gun bunnies.
Sometimes to be mean, I mouth my words when he isn't wearing his hearing aids. He gets quite animated and it amuses me no end. I'm simple and amused that way.
Terrible human. Just saying.
True, though it seems like poverty is historically a lot more livable without forced ghettoization, which is a historical reality in most dangerous cities. All of these things feed on each other.
I don't give a shit. They just use that as an argument that these gun restrictions need to be applied everywhere.
Poverty is bullshit.
It is politicians. And how they segregate the people. More specifically: Democrats for their voting base.
Been to the Delta. Black folks there are NOTHING like Chicago for instance. If it was race-you'd see it everywhere there. Do believe I was the only white folk for miles in some cases.
Same for Appalachia. Buncha poor white folks. Coal miners. Eastern KY/WV. Why do we not see poor folks acting the same here?
NOTHING like a white plantation where inner city politics are in play.
Just an opinion.
Reckon I could be wrong-but not thinking so.
And again, I'll ask-what ONE city has killed so many in a state as Chicago. One city in one state-so beyond fucked, no words. Other states have SEVERAL cities contributing to the crime. And, yes, Democrat controlled.
Sensing a theme.
Just saying.
Wow,
many presidents swore off nukes against foreign nations.
Joe is bringing these up against Americans who disagree with him.
many presidents swore off nukes against foreign nations.
Joe is bringing these up against Americans who disagree with him.
Last edited:
I don't think what I said and what you said are incompatible. I don't give a shit what color somebody is. I think when you force people into ghettos, either with a gun or with "economic incentives," you are going to get people living in public housing for which they have no sense of ownership, so all they own is the territory they claim. You are going to basically create mini factions, and if you combine that with shitty schools, poverty etc, you are going to have a self perpetuating crime wave.
This isn't theory, it is what has happened in most of these places, red state or blue. I think that is what you are saying, and it is sure as hell what I am saying. And it isn't lost on anybody that even in the red states, these are blue machine cities.
I don't know that you can attack it on only a poverty level. We have created a subculture that is many, many generations old by now. We've done it partially because we hated them, and then partially because our theories on how to help were terribly misguided. I've worked with a number of organizations who try to do this through economic opportunity and education, but it has a terribly low success rate. It is un PC to say it, but the most successful organizations, something like SEED school in DC, have succeeded by basically taking kids away from their parents and boarding them so as to truly break the chain of bad inputs. They have also run into a lot of flak for doing so, as you can imagine.
Our newest idea, and by our I don't mean our, is to simply say this stuff is OK and different culturally. Pretty sure that won't work.
I don't disagree about personal tactical nukes, as cool as they may be, but my line is way to the right of AR15s, even if it doesn't get to nuclear weapons.
Politicians are evil and skin colors are not. Correct. IMO.
You know I bet there plenty of groups in the world over time that wished they were part of a militia group that had F15s and tac nukes right before their governments killed them wholesale
I don't know if many people have been to a really ghetto inner city school. My first time I thought I had walked into Freddy Kreuger's hideout. Just appalling that our government is forcing anybody into a place like that. It was everything bad you can imagine. Dark, crumbling hallways, leaky pipes, smelled like shit. This was DC, of course. Blew my mind as every school I'd ever gone to was basically a country club.
He skipped the part about the blood of tyrants.
god forbid we should go 20 years without such a rebellion
Jefferson and Washington were at odds on Shay's Rebellion. No clear founders point of view. They were not at odds on the rest of the stupid shit Biden said, or about why citizens need to be armed.
I know a guy with a Howitzer, a guy with a tank, and a guy with a MIG, and don't mean the welder.
I'll disagree-and not gonna argue.
Read those Federalist papers and I agree. Very simply. Getting folks on the same page caused confusion and division amongst the colonies-obviously.
Not quoting anti-Federalist as well, fuck them, An opinion.
It is VERY simple as it was written and adopted. It was written for "uneducated" farmers.
Good enough for my dumb ass. And ADOPTED as law.
Don't want or NEED folks to interpret it all for me. Fuck you Supreme's.
I think most folks see and understand it for what it was and is.
Meh. We shall see.
My take, and I am no expert, is that both thought the right to revolution absolutely necessary, but that Jefferson really liked revolution, while Washington saw it as, infrequently, a necessity. Of course, Jefferson supported revolution in France on those lines, and was clearly wrong, because not all revolutions are created equal. History has probably been on the side of Washington, as the number of good historical revolutions, and by that I mean ones where the people ended up with more rights than when they started, seems to be countable on one finger. But the fear of it must always remain in the minds of politicians. Last part my belief, but I think the general belief of the founders even if they disagreed on particulars.Sounds like I have reading assignment for the night
See above. I was speaking of Shay's in particular, not about the right to revolt.
Does it matter if you can own a cannon?
Let's look at history (that no one ever reads). During the Siege of Boston, the cannons were not privately owned. The "Rebels' Captured a fort, and utilized those cannons to lay siege to Boston and drive out the British Navy.
So yeah, we don't have field artillery or an air force.
Yet.
Anyone think people are just gonna sit by and go "oh noes we can't take that, it says property of U.S. Government"
And I REALLY dislike when politicians say 'we got nukes what are you gonna do'. I cannot think of a more inflammatory statement. In a more civilized world that would cost a politician (any politician) their job. Be careful when you threaten total war.
You might get it.
(The atf, fbi, nsa, and local police are all at my door--must go now).
Let's look at history (that no one ever reads). During the Siege of Boston, the cannons were not privately owned. The "Rebels' Captured a fort, and utilized those cannons to lay siege to Boston and drive out the British Navy.
So yeah, we don't have field artillery or an air force.
Yet.
Anyone think people are just gonna sit by and go "oh noes we can't take that, it says property of U.S. Government"
And I REALLY dislike when politicians say 'we got nukes what are you gonna do'. I cannot think of a more inflammatory statement. In a more civilized world that would cost a politician (any politician) their job. Be careful when you threaten total war.
You might get it.
(The atf, fbi, nsa, and local police are all at my door--must go now).
I have long ago considered that my home city is in the Russians' nuke targeting list. We got .mil and civilian facilities important to the US (and international), plus a bunch around us, and the only tritium-producing nuclear facility in the entire US right up the river. In short, I am royally fucked if Putin decides to go Red Dawn on us, or if Skynet happens, or whatever.
I'm not afraid of it. I'll be dead before I know it. If Biden's gonna do it, bring it the fuck on and see what happens.
That's what I thought - the question is did he say the opposite because his lying filter isn't working because of his dementia (like creating the greatest voter fraud network) or because speaks the opposite of what he is thinking? I'm guessing the former..
I've been to Kruger High.
Not sure it was all that dramatic-but it sucked. An opinion.
It caused me to leave for the Army-ultimately.
That was best move I ever made as it opened my eyes wide.
So-the worst became my best. I'm just glad to be on this side of the dirt at this point. I feel blessed actually in hindsight.
Now, so many years and adventures later-I know where I should be headed and it will be much better across the board. Life influences us. We make best choices at the time.
Someone questioned why I want to relocate recently; the answer is: because I can and it makes perfect sense.
And I will. ASAP. I still have one more commitment to take care of. Family has to be first.
LOL-better late than never. Some smart fucker said.
Speaking from the East Room of the White House Wednesday afternoon, President Joe Biden re-introduced his extreme gun control agenda, advocating for a ban on modern sporting rifles and reminding lawful gun owners that the federal government has nuclear weapons.
Those who say the blood of Patriots, you know, and all the stuff about how we’re gonna have to move against the government," Biden said. "If you think you need to have weapons to take on the government, you need F-15s and maybe some nuclear weapons."
Biden also falsely stated that the Clinton era ban on modern sporting rifles, better known as the assault weapons ban, reduced crime. A 2004 Department of Justice funded study from the University of Pennsylvania Center of Criminology concluded the ban cannot be credited with a decrease in violence carried out with firearms...
Biden also falsely stated that cities with the highest crime rates, like Chicago, Baltimore and New York, don't already have strict gun control laws. They do.
Speaking from the East Room of the White House Wednesday afternoon, President Joe Biden re-introduced his extreme gun control agenda, advocating for a ban on modern sporting rifles and reminding lawful gun owners that the federal government has nuclear weapons.
Those who say the blood of Patriots, you know, and all the stuff about how we’re gonna have to move against the government," Biden said. "If you think you need to have weapons to take on the government, you need F-15s and maybe some nuclear weapons."
Biden also falsely stated that the Clinton era ban on modern sporting rifles, better known as the assault weapons ban, reduced crime. A 2004 Department of Justice funded study from the University of Pennsylvania Center of Criminology concluded the ban cannot be credited with a decrease in violence carried out with firearms...
Biden also falsely stated that cities with the highest crime rates, like Chicago, Baltimore and New York, don't already have strict gun control laws. They do.
I’m your huckleberry… you ignorant mfer… in fact I think I can speak for a bunch of huckleberries…
Similar threads
