• Win an RIX Storm S3 Thermal Imaging Scope!

    To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below! Subscribers get more entries, check out the plans below for a better chance of winning!

    Join the contest Subscribe

Bipod recommendations

I certainly don't have every model, but I do have just about every brand. I've been shooting EI and Acutac since I was told they're "off brand" junk by Atlas only people right here.

There's no question that the Ckye Pod is the most versatile/most adjustable "normal" bipod (sans the ability to rotate the rifle 360 in the ring, which only the EI has). You have to get really used to it I think. Once you learn how to adjust it well it's easy to see why a lot of people prefer it. I've never actually used it in a comp, but I can easily see the advantages on certain stages. It seems pretty bomb proof to me, but I have not really beaten on it.

Elite Iron isn't just plug and play, you need to get the right parts to set it up, which can be a pain. I think it's significantly the most robust one with all steel, and very little to break or malfunction, but it's pretty heavy. It, like Atlas, has "slop" in its function to facilitate loading the bipod for high recoil rifles. I view this sort of like a shitty Glock DA trigger, it DOES suck, but people get used to it and it really wont effect anything once you do. There are also some features that aren't all that useful in comps, but are very kewl. I feel like the ring makes eliminating cant easier than in any other design. I use the EI on my .300WM, and feel like there is no position or situation it won't work, including silly ones where a "normal" bipod won't work.

The Acutac doesn't have slop designed into the locking system for loading. It's a very toight (like a tiger) lock up on the legs with no movement. I feel that in this respect its more suited to free recoil/mod FR shooting on the low recoil/sub cartridge comp sticks where some play to facilitate loading isn't necessary (or desirable). Also I really like how you just pull on the whole leg to adjust the position, just pull on the feet to extend the legs, and they're spring loaded to retract them fast. It's the fastest, simplest deploying bipod of them all IMO. I just feel like I never drop seconds because there's noting to mess with. There's just nothing going on with it and nothing to learn. Sort of the gross motor of bipods.

There isn't a tier one bipod that I don't "like". My advice would be to ask to finger bang and play with them at a match to see what makes sense to you and find what you like without jumping just on the basis of what other people like (same thing with scopes).
 
I've used quite a few, but I'm not a gamer, so I think for PRS etc. the most flexible unit is probably the Ckye-pod. I could see a double/triple pull being useful for hunting, normally smaller prone bipods don't work where I hunt, too much tall grass etc. so you almost need to be sitting height often. I also find if I'm in more hilly/rocky terrain I can almost always usually get a nice position with a pack etc. without a bipod. So you really have to look at your use case. I'd buck some of the trend for smaller bipods, in my mind if I'm just using it prone at the range or at the bench, I'd rather have a larger/wider bipod than a small narrow one. If space/weight is not a concern might as well get more stability and often height adjustment. I'm not a big fan of panning, but that highly depends on your use case. My go-to at the range now is usually always a Super Cal or WB5 and I usually always have a V8 in my range bag, but I never use it anymore.

Attachment and your use case matters a lot, do you want something that's only picatinny, or do you need Arca, or both and does the system offer that. If you only use it on one gun it doesn't really matter, if you need to use it across a range of guns it does. Height adjustment matters a lot as well, some of these offer a lot more range of adjustment than others. The AccuTac in particular do not offer much height adjustment in the legs, especially the smaller "4" legs.

I've used Elite Iron, Harris, B&T (Atlas, Cal, Super Cal, 5H), Accutac (FC5, BR4, WB4), CkyePod and they all do things well and not as well as others. To be honest I tend to shoot good groups with them all, obviously the wider and more solid options do a bit better, but you can easily shoot awesome groups with any of them.

The Elite Iron is very solid, but it's not versatile from gun to gun unless you buy a ton of expensive adapters etc. that can easily end up costing more than the bipod itself does. I want to like it, but I rarely find myself taking it to the range. They are pretty heavy compared to the smaller bipods, even the lightweight is 23oz, that's almost twice the weight of something like a B&T V8 Atlas. However it's lighter than a CkyePod double pull by almost 6oz.

B&T are nice, I like the larger SuperCal quite a bit, if I had to pick just one for my use that would probably be it. Certainly the tried and true design, and they have a bit more "flex" in them to take up and "load" the bipod. 15 years ago they were considered "too expensive" by many, now they are the budget option. I was not a huge fan of the 5-H but to be fair at the time I had one I wasn't really using big/wide bipods so if I used it today I might feel different about it.

CkyePod is super flexible, but it just seems "fiddily" to me and I don't usually need all the extra bells and whistles and it just feels like you give up solid/strength for them. Also not a fan of the price, it's not that I can't afford it, it just isn't worth it to me. I'm sure if I shot PRS I'd probably own 3 of them.

AccuTac is my most recent experiment and I do like them quite a bit, but they are not perfect either. They are super solid and I like the leg extension design and the cant lockup is super solid. However the legs have about half the height adjustment than the SuperCal, and if you want panning like the FC-5 it adds a lot of height so the rifle doesn't sit nearly as far into the triangle of the legs as it could. The rifle sits further into the triangle on the WB4 without panning than the FC5 even though the FC5 is significantly wider/larger. I also wish they used the ARMS 17s mount for the ability to add something like the RRS Arca/Picatinny clamp. Their picatinny clamp, while rock solid, is very touchy to adjustment, I end up having to adjust it for just about every rifle I put it on, and I rarely need to adjust the RRS on my SuperCal. I wish they made a FC4 that had a non-panning attachment like the WB series to drop the rifle further into the leg triangle, and had a ARMS 17s mount option.

There are lots of others of course, so many good bipod options have cropped up the last few years, but all the options just means you really have to evaluate your use case and the features of them all to find the best fit.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: FNG1001
I’ve owned the Atlas, TBAC, Accutac, Harris and GGG.

I was about to pull the trigger on the cyke pod but read reviews of people saying they were sloppy/loose and breaking. I backed out for now until I learn more

I currently run 2 Atlas Cal Gen 2. One picatinny and one with RRS SC ARC. Both have hawk hill feet. They’re build like a tank and work best for my application

I don’t see if you’re doing comps or not. I’m not shooting comps like prs with mine. For anything above the Atlas height I run a PVA Comp40/Anvil combo tripod

I’m not saying don’t get a cyke pod. I really want one. This is a thread that made me hit the brakes on my purchase

Saw two recent YouTube videos where the Ckye Pod broke. One was from Ray at X Ring, and the other was from Jonathan Ocab.
 
This would concern me too. Can you be more specific as to what broke under what circumstances, or point me to descriptions in other posts?

The return on investment I would get from Atlas --> Ckye-Pod upgrade would be fairly minimal at this twilight stage of my competition years... but I'd like to try it, like trying a Rim-X build even though I've gone back pretty much solely to my Vudoo.
Two recent YouTube videos show Ckye Pods breaking. One was Ray at XRing and the other was Jonathan Ocab. The weak point appears to be pins that are used to adjust the leg angle.
 
Two recent YouTube videos show Ckye Pods breaking. One was Ray at XRing and the other was Jonathan Ocab. The weak point appears to be pins that are used to adjust the leg angle.
I believe there’s several aftermarket options for those now. I don’t use mine for competition so if it brakes it’s not costing me a match. I paid $550 or something like that in the px. So took the chance at that price
 
Two recent YouTube videos show Ckye Pods breaking. One was Ray at XRing and the other was Jonathan Ocab. The weak point appears to be pins that are used to adjust the leg angle.
That doesn't seem surprising to me based on how it's constructed. But I think most are aware of that and tend not to drop slam the gun on the Ckyepod that way. I see tons of these getting beaten up during matches and I've only seen 3 actual issues, 2 of which were just loose fasteners that were immediately fixed.

On the other hand, I've seen 3 Atlas bipods have legs seize up from sand getting into the locking mechanism. Stuff breaks when you use it and you need to be prepared to resolve it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nik H
I’ve been continuing to use LR-10 Accutac on a few rifles as well as GG&G

No need for anything else

Sold the atlas and Harris stuff. Moving on
 
For versatility the Ckye pod I'd hard to beat, personally use a double pull. With that being said, I really like my Accu-tac FD-4. If you break an Accu-tac then you have genuinely accomplished something, they are built like a tank. If I am bench shooting or prone I'll go with the Accu-tac every time, there is zero wiggle, they lock up tight, and build quality is very good. With that being said the Accu-tac is large, a little heavy, and not super fast to deploy.

Just depends on your needs and what you already have on hand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zebulon
I just wish Tricer would have a way to lock out the pan feature based on what I’ve read. Sure you can use the lever to tension/lock it out but now you’re also locking up the tilt. I like to be able to make micro adjustments on tilt without the bipod panning under recoil.
Yes yes recoil management fundamentals driving the rifle. Rather not have pan.
 
Last edited:
So far, I'm enjoying my Accu-Tac WB-4/ARCA. Solid PRS discount, too.
IMG_6920.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zebulon
I have atlas cal bipods. Only other ones I ever had were CV life from amazon and a Caldwell. They aren’t on the same level to even compare, but I really like the atlas bipods. You can switch out the feet on them as well. Ton of adjustability and built like tanks. Never tried a Harris, but depending on your budget that might be the way to go. The atlas is fairly expensive in my opinion.
 
Saw two recent YouTube videos where the Ckye Pod broke. One was from Ray at X Ring, and the other was from Jonathan Ocab.

I only recently discovered I could bend the pins. My single pull had a bent pin late last year and I didn't know why. Then when I was trying to adjust the legs at the range, I didn't realize I was already at the extreme end and when I was pushing out the leg, the pin bent.

At the NRL Hunter Mason Valley match I also bent a pin on my triple pull but was able to bent it bag so it wasn't jammed up.

Definitely a part they need to make using stronger steel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Craig Brown
They have many versions, and their descriptions don't tell you the differences. I want to try one, but I will have to call them to see what I can find out.
It can be confusing to figure out all the differences. Also compared to like the Atlas options the Accutac tend to offer less height adjustment so 4 vs 5 leg selection for your use case becomes more critical.

They have a comparison chart that helps some: https://accu-tac.com/pages/compare-and-differentiate-products. A lot of it depends on if you want panning or not, and the height you want. I'm not a huge fan of their panning mechanism, it works well, but it adds a ton of height to the mount, which negates how far the rifle drops into the triangle on the FC-X bipods, also the panning lever is at the front of the bipod and the cant at the rear, so you have to choose which one you want to be able to adjust behind the rifle unless you have really long arms or mount the bipod further back. I started with a WB-4 and it was too low for me, I was always at the top of it's adjustment. Then thankfully I made the "mistake" of getting a FC-5 thinking it would be taller and it was really too tall with the panning mechanism. So I swapped the legs around and both ended up about the right height.

I often see guys really like the WB-5 or FC-4, basically they end up being about the same height because the panning mechanism of the FC-4 adds so much height to the attachment point. But they are pretty big/wide/heavy options compared to something like an Atlas Cal etc. The WB-5 is a better comparison size wise to the Atlas Super Cal. I've been running the LD-50 for awhile and really like it, but it's a huge beast. I do wish it had the ability to do 45 deg forward on the legs. You lose a lot of height possibility and some flexibility if you don't have 45 deg leg options. The FC-X is even wider than the WB-X I almost wish they made the WB-X with a non-panning option.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zebulon and Nik H