This sounds a lot like you have personal knowledge and experience with herpes.
cute, but lazy and unoriginal. Much like your arguments. I'd explain what the reference had in common with you but your professed ignorance of the matter makes it seem you've not had pussy since pussy's had you.
Assumptions are different than observations.
What exactly have you observed? What you are calling assumptions are first hand accounts of people who were there when the guy walked off, went looking for him and saw their fellow combatants die during the process. What do you have to go on?
Also, this thing you have of saying we're not happy unless we can besmerch the President. If your observation were in any way competent you'd realize the reference to the CiC is wholly valid and appropriate seeing as he personally went around Congress and standard protocol to effect this exchange.
The real point of the angst, that you wilfully ignore, is that had the facts of the matter been put on the table in the manner they should have been then there would have been a chance to review whether the proposed exchange was worth it or even legal. This essentially illegal move by the President seems to have you totally nonplussed yet you react to the views of those who were there with frustration and condescension.
As I called it very early on when just like a herpetic sore you blistered onto this site - you are a troll and you're worthless in that you don't even construct a half-clever argument that causes anyone here to pause for thought.