Re: break free clp in the bore
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: dbsinh20</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Break-Free CLP contains no Teflon. Here's the MSDS...
http://www.tompkins-co.org/msds/m2291.pdf
</div></div>
You can't always identify what individual chemicals, or even what chemical names or combinations (i.e. Teflon aka PTFE) are contained in a product based upon the MSDS. If you read the referenced MSDS, there is a hint about this fact where it states, under Section II, "Proprietary Formula: - Specific Chemical Identities Have Been Withheld".
If we look at the Break Free product catalog page located here...
http://www.break-free.com/products/products_breakfreeclp.asp?catalog=law ...it states:
"Break-Free's flagship product, <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="text-decoration: underline">CLP is a unique formulation of </span></span> synthetic oils and <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="text-decoration: underline">individual proprietary ingredients</span></span> <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="text-decoration: underline"><span style="font-style: italic">which synergize in combination</span></span></span> to do three important tasks simultaneously: Effectively Clean, Lubricate and Protect metal. Break-Free CLP is now recognized around the world as the standard by which maximum metal performance and protection is ensured."
All this really says is that CLP is made up of "individual proprietary ingredients". I throw down the BS flag when they say "which synergize in combination", as that's just a mouthful of feel-good words. Gives me the impression they are trying to take what is a simple product, and give it some mystical and magical powers, and pass it off as a "snake oil" that can do everything.
If we look at the reference info found on Brownell's website, at the page located here...
http://www.brownells.com/.aspx/pid=1683/product/BREAK_FREE_CLP ...looks like it contains Teflon as far as Brownell's is concerned.
I'm really not trying to beat up on CLP, I used it myself for probably better than 20 years. Like I said earlier, based upon my own experience using CLP I observed what I felt were some shortcomings and I think there are better products on the market today. But don't take my word for it! I challenge everyone to do their own research and make up your own mind. I just encourage folks not to buy into the CLP hype just because the military uses it, or becasue your buddy says it's great stuff. I've been in the military, and I've worked for DoD, and I can tell you that the military machine does not always make the best decisions and is not always fast to change to a better product
.