Rifle Scopes BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

callen3615

Sergeant
Minuteman
Jan 27, 2010
98
13
36
Peidmont, NC
Hey guys, midway has been running a sale of this scope for a few days now. http://www.midwayusa.com/viewproduct/?productnumber=456482 I recently sold my 10x42m super sniper, I wanted to upgrade to a variable power scope. I sold the super sniper and bought a vortex viper 6.5-20x44 mil dot scope, 4 days later my scope arrives. I mount it, bore sight it and start playing around with it. It seemed to be a little clearer than the super sniper, even at 20x. The turrets were audible and very tactile, side focus worked great and the magnification ring was very nice. I was content with my new scope....then I got on here and saw a thread about a Bsa scope that was FFP, MILRAD reticule and mil turrets. I was pissed, so I ordered it. Well the bsa arrived today so I thought Id compare them.


The Vortex Viper 6.5-20x44 $400

http://www.midwayusa.com/viewproduct/?productnumber=928807

This is a very solid scope for 400 bucks. Glass is very clear, a tad better than my 10x42m super sniper. The magnification ring faces you which is nice. Side focus knob works great and the turrets are very tactile and audible. The only thing I dont like about it is that it is SFP and the turrets are small and under turret caps. I dont like the turret caps I would prefer taller more "tactical" turrets. The eye relief was fine, when you changed magnifications you do have to reposition your eye a little closer to the scope though. These pics are not the greatest but that house is about 100 yards away.



The BSA Tactical Mil Mil FFP 400-on sale at midway for 250!

http://www.midwayusa.com/viewproduct/?productnumber=456482


I was apprehensive about buying this scope, bsa isnt exactly USO or Nightforce, but it does have a "limited lifetime warranty".

The overall construction of the scope was surprisingly good! It is VERY similar to a falcon menace and it is rumored that they acquired the scope bodies from the same manufacturer in china. I would say the fit and finish of the bsa was on par with the viper. I was also surprised to find that the bsa came with a sunshade, the vortex did not. The side focus isnt too hard to move, maybe a tad more stiff than the viper but not noticeably so. The turrets are much larger, the are in mils which I think is cool.
wink.gif
They are as audible as the vipers turrets but not as tactile, just a tad mushy, but only in one direction. My super sniper was like this, you just have to take you time when indexing the turret, watch and listen while you count the clicks. This is the only category where I feel that the viper wins outright. But the bsa's turrets are not bad enough to make me not want to use it. The magnification ring on the bsa does not face you like the vortex does but I guess that doesnt matter since its ffp, had no problems changing magnification. The reticle is MILRAD, it is very fine, on par with the vortex's mildot. I was surprised by the glass in the bsa, looks comparable to the viper! When changing magnification on the bsa you dont notice it in the scope as badly as you do the viper, you dont have to move your head closer to the scope on the bsa. I think the eye relief it better on the bsa, I really noticed it trying to take pictures through the viper. Having said all of this I want to state that I have not shot with either of the scopes yet, I am assuming that the bsa will hold zero and track, I trust the vortex a little better.

All in all I think the viper is probably a marginally better scope as far as glass, turrets, overall quality is concerned. The difference in theses scopes, I feel is pretty nominal. The bsa has less magnification but more features. For the money I think I am going to stick with the bsa unless it wont hold zero, or tracks poorly. I am very surprised in the quality of the bsa tactical and would recommend it to someone who wants an affordable FFP scope. The viper is a great scope, not taking anything away from the vortex, it just lacks features compared to the bsa. I maybe wrong, if the bsa wont hold zero or track well the vortex is obviously better. But as of right now I gotta go with the bsa.

I will get some pictures up in a bit once photobucket gets it together.
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

I could have sworn it was a joke when I started reading, but you actually have pics! This will most likely turn out like Deadly's Counter-sniper thread.

Josh
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: MinorDamage</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I could have sworn it was a joke when I started reading, but you actually have pics! This will most likely turn out like Deadly's Counter-sniper thread.

Josh </div></div>

Lets hope not. I havent had any turrets fall off yet...


I tried to remain as objective as possible. Secretly I know that one scope is made by vortex and one scope is made by bsa.
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

Just got some moon pics. Better for comparing reticules.

I think I ran out of elevation....
DSCF0453.jpg


Ok, I forgot to mention maximum internal adjustment...neither have enough to get to the moon.
DSCF0449.jpg
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: KeithR41</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Spoiler alert!

It's not a "game changer."

41 </div></div>

Yes, I know. Bsa sucks. Bsa made this scope. Therefor this scope must suck. It seems to have good reviews so far. Lets give it a chance.
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

Im not complaining, nor will I. Who cares if it came from china? The vortex came from the Philippines. My super sniper came from japan...so did my car.

I love people on forums who rail against buying anything china makes, ever been to walmart? Where do you think your computer was made?
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

Its funny to me that the few posts about this scope by people who actually have one seem to give it pretty decent reviews. All the negativity comes from people who as far as I can tell don't have one. As far as BSA being "cheap, garbage, etc. etc. etc." 5 years ago I would never have event looked at buying a Ford. But, I rode in a friends 2011 Taurus the other day and was pretty impressed. Companies can change the quality of the products they produce.
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

Exactly. Ford saw the writing on the wall and stepped up their game. So did dominos. lol Maybe this is the proverbial 2011 taurus. Then again bsa could be like GM and keep making suck products.
smile.gif
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

IMO, you took a huge step back when you sold the SS10X and the Vortex Viper to get a BSA.

You must honestly think you are the only one smart enough to find a gem in the rough.

I am not suggesting going out and buying a $2,000+ optic, but trying to say the BSA is better than the SS and Vortex is just simply crazy talk.

There have been a ton of newbies to this site and the site has gone down hill from where it was a few years ago. I noticed that the seasoned members don't even reply to these types of threads because it is a waste of their time.

In the end it's your money...just don't come crying and saying how you were wrong down the line when that BSA takes a crap on you.
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

Did I say the bsa was better than the vortex? No. I didnt sell the vortex for the bsa. Did you read it?

I sold the ss. Bought the viper, then grabbed the bsa when it was on sale. At no point in time did I think that the bsa would be even close to the viper, but from what I can see, so far it is.
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

I expect you will have a different opinion after you use the turrets and look through it at range in the field. Then agian I have never seen a BSA that tracks properly.
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Mark Sebastian</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I expect you will have a different opinion after you use the turrets and look through it at range in the field. Then agian I have never seen a BSA that tracks properly. </div></div>

This guy tested the tracking.

http://www.snipershide.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=2258695
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

Now would I take the chance on a BSA right now? Absolutely not. However, this guy did, and admittedly before shooting it looks decent. That's good. The proof will be when he actually shoots, tests tracking, durability, etc.

For people to rail on him for an honest review is pretty self-centered in my opinion. His post was completely honest, told the short-comings, what he didn't like, what he did like, etc.

What really bothers me is people complaining about "chines pieces of crap" when you can't even speak your native language correctly. Waste, not waist. No excuse for deplorable grammar.
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tyler Kemp</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
What really bothers me is people complaining about "chines pieces of crap" when you can't even speak your native language correctly. Waste, not waist. No excuse for deplorable grammar. </div></div>

+1



I guess I waisted my money. lol
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

Good timing on your review. I have had the $250 dollar but on sale for $150 6-24x44 midway exclusive BSA for 2 months or so now. Tracks and holds zero perfectly. Yesterday I received my 6.5-20X50 vortex viper. So thats the same vortex as your's except slightly better at higher magnifications and lower light because of the bigger objective. I will be making a thread like this today or tomorrow comparing the two.

Let me just say that looking at them side by side I think some 'old fashion narrow minded' people might be pretty pissed off with the results I post. But I'll leave all the juicy findings for when I post a full review. Borrowing my friends SLR camera to take high resolution pictures today.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: carterjoe</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Its funny to me that the few posts about this scope by people who actually have one seem to give it pretty decent reviews. All the negativity comes from people who as far as I can tell don't have one. As far as BSA being "cheap, garbage, etc. etc. etc." 5 years ago I would never have event looked at buying a Ford. But, I rode in a friends 2011 Taurus the other day and was pretty impressed. Companies can change the quality of the products they produce. </div></div>
It's funny that you noticed the same thing... When I posted on a different forum asking for reviews on the BSA I noticed the EXACT same pattern. Some people don't really adapt well to change.... they think that all 'truths' are forever
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: timelinex</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style="color: #FF0000">Good timing on your review. I have had the $250 dollar but on sale for $150 6-24x44 midway exclusive BSA for 2 months or so now. </span>Tracks and holds zero perfectly. Yesterday I received my 6.5-20X50 vortex viper. So thats the same vortex as your's except slightly better at higher magnifications and lower light because of the bigger objective. I will be making a thread like this today or tomorrow comparing the two.

Let me just say that looking at them side by side I think some 'old fashion narrow minded' people might be pretty pissed off with the results I post. But I'll leave all the juicy findings for when I post a full review. Borrowing my friends SLR camera to take high resolution pictures today.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: carterjoe</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Its funny to me that the few posts about this scope by people who actually have one seem to give it pretty decent reviews. All the negativity comes from people who as far as I can tell don't have one. As far as BSA being "cheap, garbage, etc. etc. etc." 5 years ago I would never have event looked at buying a Ford. But, I rode in a friends 2011 Taurus the other day and was pretty impressed. Companies can change the quality of the products they produce. </div></div>
It's funny that you noticed the same thing... When I posted on a different forum asking for reviews on the BSA I noticed the EXACT same pattern. Some people don't really adapt well to change.... they think that all 'truths' are forever </div></div>

That is NOT the scope that is being discussed here - VERY, VERY different scope.
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jtb33</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
That is NOT the scope that is being discussed here - VERY, VERY different scope.</div></div>
Your right, thats why I started my post by saying what scope I am comparing to. The point is they are both midway exclusive BSA's. Testifying to the quality changes of those BSA's rather than the specific one (just like everyone that said BSA is cheap, when they aren't talking about that specific one)
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: timelinex</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Good timing on your review. I have had the $250 dollar but on sale for $150 6-24x44 midway exclusive BSA for 2 months or so now. Tracks and holds zero perfectly. Yesterday I received my 6.5-20X50 vortex viper. So thats the same vortex as your's except slightly better at higher magnifications and lower light because of the bigger objective. I will be making a thread like this today or tomorrow comparing the two.

Let me just say that looking at them side by side I think some 'old fashion narrow minded' people might be pretty pissed off with the results I post. But I'll leave all the juicy findings for when I post a full review. Borrowing my friends SLR camera to take high resolution pictures today.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: carterjoe</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Its funny to me that the few posts about this scope by people who actually have one seem to give it pretty decent reviews. All the negativity comes from people who as far as I can tell don't have one. As far as BSA being "cheap, garbage, etc. etc. etc." 5 years ago I would never have event looked at buying a Ford. But, I rode in a friends 2011 Taurus the other day and was pretty impressed. Companies can change the quality of the products they produce. </div></div>
It's funny that you noticed the same thing... When I posted on a different forum asking for reviews on the BSA I noticed the EXACT same pattern. Some people don't really adapt well to change.... they think that all 'truths' are forever </div></div>

Ultimately, it's the buyer's decision about what optic will work for their purposes. I wish I could look through some of the lower-cost options and be happy with the optical resolution...it'd leave a helluva lot more money for other stuff!
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

Well I mounted the bsa on my 22 and grabbed a piece of cardboard and drew some dots about 2 feet from each other vertically and horizontally. This is my first ever box drill so I dont know if it was me but I dont think it tracks too well. Kinda what I was afraid of. Every time I changed elevation it was very close but was always way off on windage. I dont know if it is the reticule or the turrets but the windage turrets seems to be off.
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

Remember that when you bring a discussion about a lower-end optic with a poor track record of quality and customer service (personal experience) to a forum where $2-3K optics seem to be the norm, you have to be ready for some polar opposite feedback.

It took a long time (mentally and financially) to be able to take up the philosophy of "Save and buy once" opposed to "Buy now and cry later".. which always seemed to be an honest reality.

Back to personal choice though.. if you need something and want to give it a go.. have at it. It's your money and time. Just be honest in the reviews and make sure to post updates.. even if it craps out. That is a courtesy everyone needs to provide to their fellow Hide brethren to keep them aware of who/what is good and what to stay away from
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: timelinex</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jtb33</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
That is NOT the scope that is being discussed here - VERY, VERY different scope.</div></div>
Your right, thats why I started my post by saying what scope I am comparing to. The point is they are both midway exclusive BSA's. Testifying to the quality changes of those BSA's rather than the specific one (just like everyone that said BSA is cheap, when they aren't talking about that specific one) </div></div>

Point is, that scope (SFP, different body, etc) is very clearly not in the same class/type/role as the scope that is the subject of this thread (FFP, Mil/Mil, "Tactical"). The only common characteristic is that they have the name "BSA" on them, but it's clear that they aren't made by the same company or share any similarities. In dealing with a review of a very specific scope put out by a manufacturer who is well-known for cheap and crappy scopes, it's unwise to muddy the water by trying to bring in discussion and comparisons of a second scope by the same manufacturer, especially one that doesn't have all the additions that make the reviewed scope so appealing (FFP, Mil/Mil, turrets, reticle, etc). Even the MidwayUSA reviews of your BSA and the BSA that's the subject of this topic are VERY diverse. That's my point.
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: cpt. obvious</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Well I mounted the bsa on my 22 and grabbed a piece of cardboard and drew some dots about 2 feet from each other vertically and horizontally. This is my first ever box drill so I dont know if it was me but I dont think it tracks too well. Kinda what I was afraid of. Every time I changed elevation it was very close but was always way off on windage. I dont know if it is the reticule or the turrets but the windage turrets seems to be off. </div></div>

Can you elaborate a bit more on the process you used for your box test?
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

Once again, this is the first ever tracking test I have done so I this maybe operator error.

I zeroed the scope top left, read the mils to the center dot and dialed over. The elevation and windage are pretty far off.

DSCF0458.jpg


Next I shot at the top dot, then read the mils and just adjustable elevation. This time it wasnt far off. This leads me to believe that the windage knob internals are off.
DSCF0459.jpg
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

You might also try dialing , say 4 mils up and than using the reticle to hold off and see if you still hit your zero . If this works in all 4 directions , you may be onto something .
And yes I am biased. I think bsa is garbage, but no harm in a good field test .
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

Well I just tested the vortex the same way. My vertical test was also good, but the windage was about 50/50. Is it possible that I am canting the rifle just a bit and its throwing me off alittle?


Like I said there are other reviews of this scope and no one had issues with it tracking.
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

What distance were you shooting at? From what position (prone w/bipod? sandbags? benchrest vise?)? Were you using regular ammo (eg, bulk pack stuff), or something better?
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

30 40 yards. Prone, bipod, rear bag. Bulk federal 22s. I shot some groups, maybe around 1 inch. I did pull 1 one of those shots, the last one, bottom right. I was using about 5-6 mils. I would shoot, measure to a dot or sticker, then dial, and shoot, then dial back to my zero. It returned to zero every time. I thought it did quite well.
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

cpt,

What you need to do is get a large cardboard sheet. Put a target dot (shoot-n-c) in the bottom left corner. Measure up 36" and put another dot. Measure right and place a dot at a distance of 36" from the other. Repeat until you have a "box. Now, shoot the bottom dot, dial up 10 mils and shoot at the SAME target dot you just shot. You should wind up with a hole in the target 36" above the one you were aiming at. Do the same for right, then down, the left. You will always be shooting at the same dot, your POI will just be different. That will test the tracking.

Josh
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: MinorDamage</div><div class="ubbcode-body">cpt,

What you need to do is get a large cardboard sheet. Put a target dot (shoot-n-c) in the bottom left corner. Measure up 36" and put another dot. Measure right and place a dot at a distance of 36" from the other. Repeat until you have a "box. Now, shoot the bottom dot, dial up 10 mils and shoot at the SAME target dot you just shot. You should wind up with a hole in the target 36" above the one you were aiming at. Do the same for right, then down, the left. You will always be shooting at the same dot, your POI will just be different. That will test the tracking.

Josh </div></div>
Ill do that this saturday, or maybe friday. I dont have much land here. I have to drive an hour to shoot the 308.
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

As of right now, having looked/shot through both scopes Id have to go with the Vortex and put the Bsa on the .22. The bsa is a great scope for the money, I love the mil/mil feature and the ffp, but I dont think the glass is as clear as the vortex, not do I feel as confident in the bsa in the long term. All in all the bsa is great for a rimfire or even an SPR, but I dont think it will hold up to the beating a 308 can dish out. I just wish the vortex viper came with a mildot and mil turrets.
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

I got one today. I spent about 10 minutes with it. I am NOT IMPRESSED with the glass at all. Admittedly it was overcast here today and I did not get it till 6:00 p.m..

I will look through it again tomorrow mid-day, but I feel safe to say that the one I received will go back to midway on Saturday.

At least it will have only cost me about 15.00 for return shipping.
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

I got mine today, I looked threw it while it was bright and was quite surprised for 250 dollars. Everything else seems okay it exceeded my expectations for what it is.. I mounted it on a 308. I plan on taking her out and beating the hell out of it. If it doesn't track its going on my pellet gun =)
 
Re: BSA FFP Mil Mil review and comparison

Spent some more time with the one I ordered yesterday. I still did not see anything that made me want to keep it. Glass was not in any way on mine, bright and/or clear. I may have gotten a lemon.

It is in the USPS postal system on the way back to Midway.

Good luck to those that own them.