Personally, I have built around 75-100 ARs for myself and various friends/fam over the years. No idea how many I currently own but it's somewhere around 20. Earliest is a factory colt sp1 carbine and newest is a larue 6.5g that I picked up from the ups shop today on my lunch break.
So building and owning are not really relevant to my question. Having built an AR does not explain why PSA ARs are shit, right?
I have been balls deep in this game since the late 90s and have been building and learning along the way. Ive built guns from parts companies you never even hear of.
OK
I have built around 15 PSA guns from receivers/kits. The quality is just not on par with the big boys. Parts fitment is shit, rough cycling and questionable critical components. Pins that don't fit, holes drilled off center, piss poor internal threads and poor external threads on RE,ect. Uppers out of square requiring substantial facing just to so it can be zeroed/torqued within spec.
NOW WE ARE GETTING TO IT!
But then I am completely disappointed by your lack of specifics of an underlying inherent problem that affects EVERY PSA AR made.
If I encountered any of the things you did, I would call PSA and get another part, right? I mean nothing you are saying here means a PSA gun without these specific defects is shit, and PSA would send another part under warranty for anything you described above.
Simply saying "questionable critical components" isn't meaningful. Explain why the component is suspect to you?
******* Is your entire argument that PSA is shit based on a few defective parts you received? ******
I will give you the stat that PSA might have a slightly higher defect rate than Colt, but I really don't know and don't even know where to find that info. If you identify a part as defective, get it replaced, only a fool would use it and force it into spec IMO
{this part snipped because while entertaining has nothing to do with the question I posed}
So here I am, looking for something more than 'hey I got a couple defective parts' to explain why PSA is shit
Is the PSA 7075-T6 Aluminum inferior and not to spec?
Do the PSA buffers shatter inside the tube at 1000 rounds?
Are the gas keys not staked properly?
Are the carpenter 158 bcgs really not carpenter 158?
Do they not really high pressure test? and mag particle inspect?
inferior material in the extractor or o-ring?
Do they really not use grade 8 fasteners?
Is their nitride process incorrect and weak?
Are the barrels going to melt down in 2000 rounds?
Do you see what I am after?
I got the message that you had some defective parts and for whatever reason you didn't call them and get replacement parts that were not defective.
My parts are not defective, they are as advertised and fit together perfectly and cycle perfectly. (and remember I own 1 PSA and at least 3 other brands of ARs, so I have something to compare to, I have also shot plenty of Colt ARs just don't own one).
So now what exactly is it about the non-defective PSA parts in my rifle that I need to be concerned with?
If you tell me the gas rings are made of tin foil, I will go buy BCM ones to replace them
Now is my 99% PSA and 1% BCM rifle ok to shoot?
Help me fix my inferior rifle with exact details as to what it is that makes it shit so I can replace or improve on that specific issue
Maybe I need start a new thread and go component by component and have someone here explain it to me. I admit I don't know everything there is to know about guns, but I can understand simple concepts like this metal alloy is stronger than that one etc etc, and what I don't understand first hand, I can google and usually find enough detail to make it make sense to me.
So help me figure this out?