I am a little more interested in the 3.3-18x, but I will try to get my hands on whichever comes out first.
ILya
Ditto
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am a little more interested in the 3.3-18x, but I will try to get my hands on whichever comes out first.
ILya
Also, for those who might discount the XTR III 5.5-30x56 because it is 5.5x on the low end, take a look at the FOV numbers and you'll find the 5.5-30 actually has greater FOV than many 5-25's at the low end. For me, FOV almost always trumps magnification making this a viable option for those who might be more used to 5-25 scopes.I am a little more interested in the 3.3-18x, but I will try to get my hands on whichever comes out first.
ILya
Can you disclose who the vendors are that will be getting the 5.5x30? I think one might be right at home on a 22LR trainer I am going to finish in the next few weeks...5.5-30x56s hitting the shelves this month. They are undergoing QC right now with some of them in the wild. Jose Gardner won a PRS competition with one last weekend.
And if I'm not mistaken, the 3.3-18x50 has some expected deliveries in September. Hopefully some folks are able to grab one for hunting season.
Are you wondering which vendors will be getting the XTR III scopes? I would imagine every vendor who has orders with Burris will have access to order, but maybe you're asking which vendor will be getting the "first" orders and for that you will need to contact Burris directly and see if they can provide any insight. I would also check with the following Hide vendors (in no particular order) Jason at eurooptic.com (@Baner), Richard at cstactical.com (@CSTactical), Doug at Cameralandny.com (@gr8fuldoug) and Marshall at sportoptics (@MarshalC_SportOptics ) and Scott at libertyoptics.com (@LibertyOptics ) - all these guys are Burris dealers and are a pleasure to work with, they will treat you right!Can you disclose who the vendors are that will be getting the 5.5x30? I think one might be right at home on a 22LR trainer I am going to finish in the next few weeks...
I would have called it something to get away from the XTR and made more of the fact it’s a USA made scope.
I always thought it was a National Park in British ColumbiaIs that what BAMF stands for?![]()
Real life in the flesh XTR III's, I bet you could pay for admission to that unboxingoh snap oh snap oh snap.... expect unboxing video tonight!! actual production scope!!!
...that is if I can figure out how to post a video!! haha
DT
Take it off... slooowly ?The box is bad ass!
Where's the video! Take it off!!
Regards,
DT
Any updates on the 3.3? Still Sept?
One thing you will notice almost instantly while looking through this scope is that the "black ring" inside the scope is almost non-existent. I don't know how Burris did it, but it is possibly my favorite feature of the whole scope package. Its almost like the scope "disappears" when looking through it. hashtaglove
Exact same thought myself. Sounds like it won't be out in time for hunting season this fall.I'm looking to get an 18x illuminated myself for a hunting rifle.
Im in the same boat on the 18X illumination.I hope for one for Christmas.Exact same thought myself. Sounds like it won't be out in time for hunting season this fall.
Agreed! I've been hunting for over a couple decades and never once needed/wanted illumination. I've only owned a couple scopes with illumination over the years, and those were only turned on when I first purchased to make sure it worked.....then never needed it. Same as you, maybe I'll eat these words, but I'd rather save a few bucks and forego illumination. Frankly, if illumination is the make or break on a shot, I'm not doing my job well enough anyways.I'm with you there. I need at least one 18x and another 30x. Ideally though I should get two of the 18x.
I would'nt let illumination be a deciding factor for me. I'll probably try to get one for next year with it included. But the simple fact of the matter is I've been avidly hunting everything that runs, jumps, or swims since 1978. I used to take 3 weeks off every year with my dad and haul the horses from Idaho, to Wyoming, and Montana, hunting Elk and mulies. I've chased coyotes and wolves, lions, bears, you name it. If it lives in the northwest and you can buy a tag, I've hunted it.
In all that time my illumination has been turned on for a total of five minutes. I used it once about 3 years ago on a black bear at about 400 yards in heavy timber, first thing in the morning. I dont think I needed it even then. I've found the "low light" dusk and dawn scenario to not really play out in real life the way it does on forums. Low light glass technology is becoming awfully good these days, which helps offset the need for it.
But I understand people wanting it. Its another tool in the bag. And it's better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it. Maybe I'll eat my words someday and have a shot opportunity at first light heading for No Tell'em Ridge and fill my tag before I've finished my first cup of coffee.![]()
...But the simple fact of the matter is I've been avidly hunting everything that runs, jumps, or swims since 1978...
Looks like that’s a Gen II. No bueno.Not so good for the fella shooting the match! Gen 1 vipers weren't the most durable design, that's pretty well documented. Hopefully vortex gives him an upgrade over that vintage!
So a pretty fun day getting familiar with the new scope. I wont get in to which one did better at what. I'll tell you that general consensus was that the XTR3 is looking like a very nice scope, it was as good or better than some pretty popular optics in some very key categories. I simply dont want to break down and give it to you as my opinion, I want you guys to reach your own conclusions. They are in the wild, I know two guys here locally that purchased one, so feedback will be coming in soon.
You live in 2004?Mark 4s and NF NXSs are still top dog in my neck of the woods.
You live in 2004?
I wouldn't mind going back to 1970In some aspects, other parts of day to day life are stuck in 1970.
Thanks for the evaluation Birddog, those are some good scopes to compare to and vary in price range with the XTR III being the "cheapest" of all, one would not expect it to compete with a scope at 2x the price so not a huge surprise there, but the fact it held its own and did better in some areas than the others would seem to indicate Burris has listened and listened well to the community. FOV, DOF/Parallax and eyebox forgiveness are finally getting a more prominent from shooters as they realize some scopes can really limit the field use.I'll give you my thoughts. And @FALex has looked through it, maybe he'll chime in with his thoughts. He once owned the XTRII but the eyebox drove home nuts.
So I got to spend time with the 4 scopes mentioned above. Mostly early morning except for the Nightforce which I also got behind some in the afternoon when the mirage had increased. I'll start with glass, because this is the Hide.
With all the scopes set at 25x, the best glass was the ATACR. No surprise. Good brightness, color, it resolved really well.
Both myself and my buddy put the XTR3 in second. You could tell it apart from the ATACR, but glass looks really good in this scope. Its bright with no visible CA.
Close 3rd was the Razor. Also well controlled CA, but it was a little less bright than the XTR3. But it also resolved the targets and shrubbery well.
4th was the MK5. It had some CA giving it a yellowish tinge that was exacerbated by the early morning sunlight. Parallax resolved quickly on this scope, it was easy to get behind, but this particular MK5 just didnt have that bright pop that the other three had.
In the eyebox department I lean a little towards personal preference. I liked the Razor and the XTR3 the best. In reality, they were all easy to get behind and had user friendly eyebox. Even the Razor that was on a rifle with a long stock and low cheek riser. The exact opposite of what I use. The only thing that separated these for me was that edge to edge glass look at the ocular lenses. The Razor and XTR3 have a thin black ring created by the scope body. The ATACR and MK5 was more pronounced and thick. Like looking through a tunnel once you become used to a little thin ring. But again, all were perfectly useable and generous.
I didnt mess with anyone's diopter settings, this was just before a match, but parallax resolved well for all of them. The XTR3 looked pretty good in the afternoon when mirage was up compared to the ATACR. Conditions were difficult for everything at that point. The XTR3 parallax is very quick and easy to use. The depth of field is generous and I had no difficulty moving through targets at differing ranges without going back to my parallax knob. I cant really say that one scope was clearly superior than another in this category. They all seemed fairly similar in how well focused the targets were at various yardages. I didnt spend a lot of time comparing this. But what I did see looked close through the 4 scopes.
As my turret has broken in over the last week I have come to like it more. After using it in a match I'm very pleased with it. It started out too stiff, now it feels great. It's very tactile, feedback is excellent. This is a personal preference or what you are used to kinda category, so I wont comment on the other brands. Good turrets and tracking should be a given at this price point.
The XTR3 owned field of view. It pretty much had 2.5 to 3 mils of visible optic over the others. For example, on one comparison, the 7mil mark was on the edge, but in the XTR3 on the same magnification it was showing to 8.5 mils. It's a noticeable feature.
So that's just my quick down and dirty. It will be interesting to see more opinions on this as they hit the wild. I think what I've seen so far has been pretty impressive. I'll tell you honestly that I was nervous about it falling flat in comparison to other quality optics. But it didn't, it goes head to head with some pretty good scopes. Having seen how they compare to at least the few optics I put along side it, I can honestly say that it's a very strong contender at its price point.