Rifle Scopes Burris XTR3!!!

They told me MSRP $1700 to $1800

If they sell for <$12-1300, I would say they will be big hitters. A marked increase in cost over the XTR2 for a (presumed) marked increase in performance over the XTR2. That, I could justify.

If they actually try to sell them for $17-1800, they’ll fizzle out like the DMR Pro. Thanks but hard pass.
 
I may be old fashioned, but Im quite excited this will be nearly 100% USA made. Just the glass will be imported and I have no idea from where. Funny thing about laws and stuff, Burris wont be able to say this is USA made because the law requires a crazy high % of the product to be made here. So just having the lenses imported, ki-boshes the USA made moniker. But it will be built and assembled in Greeley, CO.

Unless something has changed since the whole Leupold debacle then it's 80% by count to be labeled made in USA. There's WAAYYY more pieces in the erector assembly, springs, screws, and everything else in an optic than lenses. So what else is coming from over seas and where is it coming from?

Hopefully not from Nunya like Premier, that didn't turn out so well.

I hope they source quality parts and it turns out great because the market needs more reliable optics, I'm just always leery of where the parts come from and for good reason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5RWill
Dang, this escalated quick. haha.
I have 25.5 mils of up right now with a 100 yd zero. On the same rifle with same rings, my 4-20 has 18 mils of up left.
nope sorry. I will weigh after the match this weekend. Very similar to the Xtr2
Glass way better when compared to your xtr2?
Its 300% better than the original XTR2's. I think I got lucky with my current 4-20's because they are good, but yes its even better than them. I have a Bushy LRHS 4-18, T5Xi 3-16, USO 3-17 and a Luppy Mark6 and its better than them as well. But that could be also attributed to the large FOV taking in more light making it seem brighter?? As I said, Ive literally got 30 rnds down the scope in perfect lighting so hold your horses. There is ZERO purple fringing in bright sun tho. Quite exciting.
Keep the questions coming, Ill answer when I can if I know.
Regards,
DT

DT, that is an impressive amount of mils with a 100y zero!
How about the length, I don't think I've seen that spec, looks shorter than the 4-20.
Obviously the glass is "300% better than the original XTR2" is subjective, but encouraging to hear from someone who has a lot of time with the XTR2 4-20's. Also encouraging to hear that CA may be better controlled in the XTR3, it was an issue in the XTR2 but to be expected at that price point, if this truly does come in at $1500 or more, the expectation would be much better CA control.
The scope looks great, I really like that package, I wonder if I travel up to Greeley if they'll let me play with one, any strings you can pull @GeoffatBurris ?

PS - not sure that bubble level location is going to be very effective when you're behind the scope ;)
1543429885038.png
 
Depending on price, I have to think an XTR3 would start taking over some of the T5Xi market share... makes me wonder if that will go away or if Steiner will come out with an improved version of the Tactical series as well (a la M7Xi).

Steiner/Burris has always kinda seemed like the Lexus/Toyota kinda deal so I’m interested to see how this will fit into the product lineup and if it puts others at risk.
 
The XTR II was made in the Phillipines.

It's one of the most durable scopes on the market. So components from there have proven themselves completely reliable.

It is a matter of QC by the ordering company more than anything else. You can get very high quality mechanical components out of Phillipines, China, Japan, etc.

ILya
 
Where's the rest of the components coming from though? Some good glass comes out of Japan without a doubt, but the mechanical components matter for reliability. We've seen plenty of optics assembled here that still have issues because part quality is skimped on. If the parts are coming from Japan too, great, I have no doubt that they can assemble a quality product here. If they're coming from China and/or Philippines, Taiwan, or basically any asian country other then Japan then it will get a hard pass from me.
The country of origin is irrelevant to quality. The vendor's quality systems, manufacturing systems, tools, equipment, and most importantly it's culture determine the quality of its products.
 
It is a matter of QC by the ordering company more than anything else. You can get very high quality mechanical components out of Phillipines, China, Japan, etc.

ILya

People forget that these other countries are designing and building aircraft, precision manufacturing equipment, etc. It's not that they CAN'T make quality stuff. Rather, it's that often, from an American standpoint, we're not asking them to. We're going to them to cut corners and make it cheaper due to lower labor costs. They're fully capable of manufacturing to pretty darn good tolerances and quality.

I'm excited to see the reticle in this one. These, and the new NF reticle, definitely have me excited for SHOT. Still looking forward to ZCO as well of course. It's a great time to be in the PR world!
 
Last edited:
I really like my XTR II on my 6.5 creed and have no problems seeing out to 1k yards. This looks like it has some nice upgrades but the design really looks like the bushy DMR II. I bought a couple of the LRHSi on the Gap deal and for the money they are really hard to beat right now....
 
I had a great conversation with Sky Leighton last night. Just when I thought I couldn't be more excited about the release of this scope, I find out I'm wrong. Burris has really pulled out all the stops on this one!

I have the answers to a lot of the questions above, so I'll hit a few of them. To just spill out everything I learned about this optic would be even more lengthy, so if I dont hit your question, post it up and if I don't know the answer I'll try to get it for you.

We will get the price tag out of the way first. MAP pricing for the 3.3-18 will be $1649. The non illuminated versions are the first to come to market with illuminated to follow down the road. The XTR II will still be available at the 1k price point, but this is the new Burris flagship. You simply cant build a scope like this in the sub $1200 price point. They are significantly elevating their game, and people are going to find this scope is still going to be an excellent value..

As Dorgan mentioned the new Enhanced Special Competition Reticle is still tied up with attorneys and patents. But it's close. I got a pic of it last night, and let me tell you, it hits on all cylinders!! I think this is quite simply the best designed and most detailed competition reticle on the market. Burris is using a new technology to etch the glass that creates a sharper reticle. All the lines are sharp, the corners of etchings are all crisp and defined. It looks amazing!

As you can all see, it's a shorter scope than the XTR II, and it's also lighter. We have no finalized weights yet due to some tinkering with cosmetics. But lets just say for you guys who tossed out some weight ranges you believe the scope should hit, you will be pleased.

Place of manufacture is officially "Made in Colorado". Rather than run afoul of hair-splitting legal ramifications for using one outsourced screw too many, they are telling it like it is. The glass is from Asia, and some screws are outsourced from overseas per Burris specifications. Every other component is made and assembled in Greeley Colorado. The tube body, turrets, everything, from the ground up. They have built one of the most advanced clean rooms in the industry and are producing this one in house here in the USA!

The windage cap will be the MAD turret system, for those of you who are familiar with Burris' capping system. So you can cap it or leave it exposed. There is a fantastic elevation turret that is incredibly cool in the works. Pretty much an industry first. But I'm afraid it's also stuck in the patent process. So all I can do at this time is dangle a Twinkie and say more cool stuff is coming.

I'll try to wrap this up, there is so much to cover. I think Sky said it best last night when he said the XTR III is everything the XTR II wasnt. The eyebox is incredibly good in the III, tunneling is non existant, the glass is true HD with little to no CA and crisp edge to edge clarity, the parallax goes down to 20 yards, and it uses the same bulletproof turret system as the II. Both scopes are a 7x erector with industry leading fields of view, and the mag range of the next release will be a 5.5-30x56, and it's going to look fantastic at 30x!

Theres more to cover, but I dont want this to run forever...

Hopefully that answers some of your questions.

Everywhere I have ever lived I have allways tried to support and buy from local companies, in Texas it was Larue and a few others, in Arkansas it was Wilson Combat and Choat machine and tool and now that I'm in Colorado I foresee a road trip in my future to Greely Colorado.
 
I got 30x from Sky last night.

And it's actually pretty cool that they stop there. With a 7x erector they could take this optic to 35x. But they didnt want to run the travel all the way to the ragged edge and impact that last 2x of optical quality.

They stop it at 30x so it still maintains that user friendly eyebox and the glass is still sharp throughout the entire magnification range.

That sounds like they really did listen and learn from the short comings of the XTR II. A nod of respect, they deserve.
 
Dang, that kinda sucks on the price.

Count me in the group that is of the "if this is $1500+ street price for the high mag version, I'm probably out" opinion. I don't expect a next-gen XTR to compete with a razor gen 2. But of course, that's based on the enormous performance gap between the XTR2 and Rz G2 right now. If the XTR3 completely closes that gap, then there's no reason it wouldn't be popular at a similar price point as the razor G2.

IMHO, Burris should avoid a repeat of the T5xi where it was completely non-competitive glass-wise at it's initial price point (ignoring the tracking issues as I assume they've learned that lesson). It's just not great business IMHO to release something that has to be heavily discounted for the performance to match the price.
 
Under 13" is what I was told. I didnt get an exact number I'm afraid. So its trimming more than 2" off the 3-15 XTRII, which is the shortest scope in the current XTR lineup.

Nice. This will be a good fit for my 18" Grendel.

It's interesting these are going to be 6x since the new Steiner is 7x. I'm curious if we'll see another Steiner M7Xi model.
 
Last edited:
We’re gonna need some video, mmkay.

Before we get to the point of me asking to take some videos, I first need to convince them to let me into the building. As it were, I have some work reasons to swing by Denver in a couple of weeks, so I will try to visit Burris while I am at it.

I like XTR II scopes (especially the lower mag ones), and I know that they have been working on XTR III for some time so I am exceedingly curious.

ILya
 
  • Like
Reactions: RFutch
Wishing for the new and improved XTR III to be at the old XTR II price point is hilarious to me. Maybe right before the XTR4 or whatever comes out the XTR III will be down there.
XTRII 5-25 is around $900 new, right? I don't think anyone has an issue with $1200-$1300 (potentially a 40% price increase) if the performance is significantly improved. But it would have to be a truly major advancement to justify nearly doubling the price. Of course, nobody knows how much better the performance will be, so trying to justify the price versus performance at this point is futile. My only thought was that if its twice as good as the XTRII and will target an entirely different price point, they should have given it an entirely new lineup name. But who cares - hopefully it's an awesome scope and dirt cheap.
 
Own a gen 2 razor and an XTR II (in fact, purchased here from Dorgan). At a similar price point, will probably purchase a second Razor Gen II. But I do wish they were not such a power pole atop the rifle! If the XTR III closes that gap … maybe. The tracking is stellar on both.
 
XTRII 5-25 is around $900 new, right? I don't think anyone has an issue with $1200-$1300 (potentially a 40% price increase) if the performance is significantly improved. But it would have to be a truly major advancement to justify nearly doubling the price. Of course, nobody knows how much better the performance will be, so trying to justify the price versus performance at this point is futile. My only thought was that if its twice as good as the XTRII and will target an entirely different price point, they should have given it an entirely new lineup name. But who cares - hopefully it's an awesome scope and dirt cheap.

I think regular prices for the higher magnification XTR II scopes are in the $1050 to $1300 range. I am not sure how going up to $1600-$1700 is doubling.

As as the price for the XTR III goes, I do not think there is any sense in speculating what it should cost until we know how good it is, i.e. what its direct competition in terms of performance is.

If it ends up costing around $1600-$1700 it is up against Athlon Cronus and Delta Stryker, for example, but then it also has to be better than the less expensive Athlon Ares ETR and PST Gen 2.

ILya
 
$1,500-$1,600 for a predominately USA made scope, where the predecessor's internals are known to be great, that is now potentially lighter, shorter, more travel, better reticle, better glass - I'm in!

BEST COMMENT YET

Im lolling people wanting S&B scope for SWFA prices. Come on now peeps!!
(not that im not in that boat a little haha)

Not gonna lie tho...I am most excited about the USA part. Hope they don't fek it up tho. My Steiner T5 3-15 is a pretty solid little scope and it was made in Greeley. WOnder if they are still going to be made there also...


DT
 
I think regular prices for the higher magnification XTR II scopes are in the $1050 to $1300 range. I am not sure how going up to $1600-$1700 is doubling.

As as the price for the XTR III goes, I do not think there is any sense in speculating what it should cost until we know how good it is, i.e. what its direct competition in terms of performance is.

If it ends up costing around $1600-$1700 it is up against Athlon Cronus and Delta Stryker, for example, but then it also has to be better than the less expensive Athlon Ares ETR and PST Gen 2.

ILya
I thought I had seen them for <$1000. Must have been wrong. If so, anything >$1500 would have been near double or full on double cost.

I agree there's no need to speculate on value until performance has been assessed.
 
Looks like we wont be needing a 3-18 Vortex AMG after all.

I'm hoping this is just the first of many new scopes in line for 2019, might be the year I finally get all my rifles glass that I'm 100% content with.


My thoughts exactly. I've been wanting a 3-18amg to come out for a while. With the FOV the 3.3-18 is putting out, a 4-20 would have been nice.
 
Field of view is fantastic on this scope. Its definitely become one of my favorite features.

I've found over the last couple years that I have been running on lower and lower magnification ranges to increase that field of view. I shot a lot of stages on 12x this year. It just makes target transition so much smoother when you pick up the target quickly. 95% of my shooting is 12x to 16x.

With nicer glass, a big forgiving eyebox and large FOV, I'm thinking it just got a whole lot better...

I agree FOV is often overlooked and one of the most important features of a scope. However for competition and paper/steel ranges anything under 6x is totally useless. I’ve never gone below 9-10x in a PRS match. The reticle becomes different to use for holds at the lower end.

When hunting comes into play and a deer is 25 yards away that low end becomes crucial. A shorter 20” 6.5 creed with this 3.3-18 scope in a lightweight setup would be an awesome whitetail rig for my areas I hunt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Birddog6424
Now that this is out, and the XTRII is such a piece of shit, you guys replacing them with the XTR III should just give me your old junk 4-20 SCR MIL please. I will dispose of it properly.

I just wouldn't feel right about myself unless I offered out of the goodness of my heart to help you with such a grueling task.