I was doing my reading today for my DC history and ran across this you can read my expert from my mandatory notes to my professor which I talked about what I felts was clearly one sided. I get a history book can never be completely unbiased as a human interaction with it had to happen at some point. However this just felt very out in the open. This happened earlier in the year too with a chapter on President grant I can also post my notes to that if anyone is interested. My professor has not once commented on what I said to him despite giving me 100% on all my notes for the class. I am thinking most people my age just read over this and don’t think twice and the subtle hints and jabs here in there will eventually create problems down the road. I am by no means a history buff this was just my honest observation from my reading material. And I’m bored in an airport with a 5 hr layover so I got all the time to make a post like this