Did you miss the part where the same Proof barrel shot 1/2 moa groups out of a different rifle?
:begin rant:
It’s rare that any of what you say fits anyones narrative but your own bias towards your favored manufacturers.
Too often I see your name pop up in threads where you choose to just dump on something you don’t like. I get it, we’ve all been burned by faulty equipment but then there are those whose self devoted purpose in life seems to be to bash a manufacturer and make sure they can influence everyone they possibly can.
Based on previous history it is doubtful I’m going to change your mind about Proof (or your other despised manufacturers), so we can leave it with - you despise them and think anyone who’d buy one is never going to shoot a decent group while I and many others have had positive experiences.
:end rant:
Unless you actually have something to contribute to this thread rather than just bash Proof I’d rather you take your comments elsewhere.
Again, sorry you don't like the narrative.
How about on Monday when they open back up give Dan Warner of Warner tool a call and ask him what he thinks of Proof Barrels. There are half a dozen other smiths who have said the exact same thing as Dan to me, except he is not shy about it.
Experience is just that. There are alot of subpar companies in this industry and the ONLY way they get better is being being held accountable.
You also are just plain making shit up. Where did I say "You despise them and think anyone who’d buy one is never going to shoot a decent group while I and many others have had positive experiences."? If you are going to quote me, atleast get it right. There are plenty of people out there with proof barrels that shoot well. I am one of them. I also have one that is shit. 50% failure rate right there.
Here is what it comes down to since so many get offended and cry when their favorite brand gets called out. Proof may make 1000 barrels and 100 of them have a problem. 10% issues. Out of them, depending on user maybe only 5 or 6% will actually understand how they shoot and what should be expected after exhausting a ton of time and money trying to diagnose the problem. Half will blame something else, ammo, gun, scope, rings, chassis, bad shooter, bad chamber job ect.
Do you honestly believe Barlien, Hawk Hill, K&P & Krieger have the same failure rate for making blanks?
I don't have the time or patience for that bullshit. We KNOW proof puts out a higher failure rate than comparable cut rifle barrel manufactures. Simple google searches confirm this. Talk to most of the high volume, respected smith that you hear about on this site (and some on this site aren't worth the business to be honest) and ask them what barrels do they have the most issues with post chamber job. Its not rocket science. Why the fuck would I waste weeks/months to wait for a blank, spend $400 to get it chambered, wasted how many hundreds of dollars of components and hours of time when I can just buy what is essentially guaranteed to function at a level where I want for about the same money? Its an expected value equation and the results are not even close.
So when someone comes here and asks for advice or information, it does them a disservice to not give them the whole picture. If it was me and my money and I did not know about any of this shit, I would hope someone would step up and say something before I take a risk I was not aware of or willing to take.
But hey proof gives out tons of certs and has a gnarly military discount, so we should just suck their dicks even if they put out lots of bad barrels right?