• HideTV Updates Coming Monday

    HideTV will be down on Monday for updates. We'll let you all know as soon as it's back up and message @alexj-12 with any questions!

  • Win an RIX Storm S3 Thermal Imaging Scope!

    To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below! Subscribers get more entries, check out the plans below for a better chance of winning!

    Join the contest Subscribe

Suppressors denials using a quicken trust

Think of it this way. Where was that Quicken trust wrote? Was it in your state? Did you supply all of your state requirements to Quicken and then print it out?
Quicken is written very broadly and you fill in your basic information. There is nothing basic about this process, you are in possession of federally regulated items.
I would rather be specific and pay the money now then be found with an invalid trust that will certainly cause you a lot more issues then $600.00 spent earlier.

I don't know where it was written, but one of the first if not the first question I answered before the trust was even started was what State and County I lived in.
 
I don't know where it was written, but one of the first if not the first question I answered before the trust was even started was what State and County I lived in.

Go find that 2003 edition we all used here in town, IT DOES NOT HAVE IT. I paid for the program and it was not part of adding in the information it requested.
I had my local lawyer that handles our company litigation look it over. He said he wouldn't put that much risk on a Quicken trust.

I don't really care as this debate will go on and on. I went the lawyer route because I felt more secure with it. The end!
 
Go find that 2003 edition we all used here in town, IT DOES NOT HAVE IT. I paid for the program and it was not part of adding in the information it requested.
I had my local lawyer that handles our company litigation look it over. He said he wouldn't put that much risk on a Quicken trust.

I don't really care as this debate will go on and on. I went the lawyer route because I felt more secure with it. The end!

You asked.. I was just answering your question not debating or arguing you, I don't really care what the 2003 edition says. I don't care that you or anyone else used a lawyer or Quicken or wrote the shit themselves. I just stated my experience with Quicken.
 
Last edited:
You asked.. I was just answering your question not debating or arguing you, I don't really care what the 2003 edition says. I don't care that you or anyone else used a lawyer or Quicken or wrote the shit themselves. I just stated my experience with Quicken.

Well, I am proud of you that you came out and shared with us. The funny thing is when a few of us shared the fact that the lawyer based trusts are more secure in their function we damn near got lynched over it. How dare we ask you to spend more then $24.99 for a federally viewed document!!!! Shame on us! :rolleyes:
 
Go find that 2003 edition we all used here in town, IT DOES NOT HAVE IT. I paid for the program and it was not part of adding in the information it requested.
I had my local lawyer that handles our company litigation look it over. He said he wouldn't put that much risk on a Quicken trust.

I don't really care as this debate will go on and on. I went the lawyer route because I felt more secure with it. The end!


It is in the version I have,.. I can not remember if my copy is 2006 or 2007 but it was one of the first questions you had to answer.