Wilco!@christopher.dow I'd like to see this feature too. Maybe if you bug @ney1 enough we'll see it happen
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wilco!@christopher.dow I'd like to see this feature too. Maybe if you bug @ney1 enough we'll see it happen
1. Read the work by Gus and Jim the linear solutions are incorrect by default
2. Using the Kestrel clean is not right especially when traveling, I routinely do this and it always has to be tweaked on location. If this was not the case they would not rent Raton prior to the King of 2Mile in order to test and validate.
I am at 5000ft above sea level and always travel to locations
3. The struggles individuals have are real in lining up the data. TRASOL does a much better job out of the box. Very little tweaking required.
4. The Truing is clumsy and flawed on numerous levels. We do it differently and it not only works better it carries over more accurately. If you are changing true data like MV how are you clean ?
5. They stood up in front of a crowd and said it was wrong and suggestioned corrections
5. CWAJ happens at the muzzle we Zero it out. The downrange effect requires a lot more wind to become noticeable and I promise I Shoot in more wind than most. Again read Jim and Gus.
6. Truing the BC for your system is a better way, and the majority turn the wind off as practical application across a wide range of shooters has demonstrated the merit. You can argue success vs the blind faith on thing that are barely noticeable.
It’s 3DOF so explain your proactive approach vs CB or 4DOF? Faking it is not proactive hence the fact we find it to work as advertised with these features off.
3DOF has not idea what happened the instant before or after, there is no bullet, just a point in space. On the other hand CB and TRASOL know where the Bulliet was and where it is going hence the massive amount of code required.
7. I religiously run both a kestrel and CB/TRASOL solutions, I travel, compete, and see hundreds of students a year who obsess over this, I have a pretty good idea of what works why and how. I even upgraded my range to horizontal bar targets specifically for software.
View attachment 6936911
Buzzwords and marketing aside, I promise when the winds are high enough both planes suffer and the shooter has to adapt because they are never straight and square, read: linear as this is the only way it can try to solve.
1. Read the work by Gus and Jim the linear solutions are incorrect by default
2. Using the Kestrel clean is not right especially when traveling, I routinely do this and it always has to be tweaked on location. If this was not the case they would not rent Raton prior to the King of 2Mile in order to test and validate.
I am at 5000ft above sea level and always travel to locations
3. The struggles individuals have are real in lining up the data. TRASOL does a much better job out of the box. Very little tweaking required.
4. The Truing is clumsy and flawed on numerous levels. We do it differently and it not only works better it carries over more accurately. If you are changing true data like MV how are you clean ?
5. They stood up in front of a crowd and said it was wrong and suggestioned corrections
5. CWAJ happens at the muzzle we Zero it out. The downrange effect requires a lot more wind to become noticeable and I promise I Shoot in more wind than most. Again read Jim and Gus.
6. Truing the BC for your system is a better way, and the majority turn the wind off as practical application across a wide range of shooters has demonstrated the merit. You can argue success vs the blind faith on thing that are barely noticeable.
It’s 3DOF so explain your proactive approach vs CB or 4DOF? Faking it is not proactive hence the fact we find it to work as advertised with these features off.
3DOF has not idea what happened the instant before or after, there is no bullet, just a point in space. On the other hand CB and TRASOL know where the Bulliet was and where it is going hence the massive amount of code required.
7. I religiously run both a kestrel and CB/TRASOL solutions, I travel, compete, and see hundreds of students a year who obsess over this, I have a pretty good idea of what works why and how. I even upgraded my range to horizontal bar targets specifically for software.
View attachment 6936911
Buzzwords and marketing aside, I promise when the winds are high enough both planes suffer and the shooter has to adapt because they are never straight and square, read: linear as this is the only way it can try to solve.
I just tried to run some simulations for another member having trouble, and realized that TRASOL doesn't allow an inHG of less than 25 inHG. So it basically is unusable above 5,000 ft. There are plenty of guys hunting and living above that altitude.@LastShot300 I’ll do some comparisons with CB too. Maybe we can apply some smoothing for TRASOL.
I just tried to run some simulations for another member having trouble, and realized that TRASOL doesn't allow an inHG of less than 25 inHG. So it basically is unusable above 5,000 ft. There are plenty of guys hunting and living above that altitude.
Isn’t manually how most people enter their data?You must mean manually entering the info. I live above 7000’ but I always just use the DA feature.
No need for stepped BCs, there is a DC factor which is a much more sophisticated way to adjust the drag curve.Really need stepped BCs and powder temp correction feature.
That worked for me on my new Samsung S9+ ... thank you sir.I'm an android fanboy. This is what I did.
Went to all my apps, see pic 1
Then I press on the app, with my finger, long enough for this to pop up, see pic 2
I then selected "permission" see pic 3
I then made sure all of them were turned on. I'm good as new now
Im in west desert of Utah and TRASOL is again effing up and wasting lots of time and ammo for me
The BP is 25.75 in Hg the temp is 78 degrees and TRASOL says the DA is 11,000 feet. Thats almost double the true DA. Doesnt matyer if i capture the weather data or enter my own it gives that reault
AB gives the true value.
If this product doesnt get the support it needs and become a consistent reliable App, Im going back to AB mobile.
This is frankly BS
Perhaps you are using the "BP" tab rather than the "SP" tab? "SP" is for entering station pressure (absolute pressure). The "BP" function is for inputting barometric pressure which has ALREADY been adjusted for altitude.Im in west desert of Utah and TRASOL is again effing up and wasting lots of time and ammo for me
The BP is 25.75 in Hg the temp is 78 degrees and TRASOL says the DA is 11,000 feet. Thats almost double the true DA. Doesnt matyer if i capture the weather data or enter my own it gives that reault
AB gives the true value.
If this product doesnt get the support it needs and become a consistent reliable App, Im going back to AB mobile.
This is frankly BS
This is probably ridiculously hard, but if given my wish, I would do away with the "spinning wheel" adjustments and just go to direct input.@Skookum you're right, the pressure should be able to go below 25. This will be fixed in the next update.
This is probably ridiculously hard, but if given my wish, I would do away with the "spinning wheel" adjustments and just go to direct input.
I've been using this new app for several weeks now, and the constant "fat finger" effect is incredibly annoying.
I don't know if Android has app settings that automatically populate it
You could try tapping on "slope" and select "delete" in the upper left corner of the page. Repeat with "Moving Target"
It’s currently for iPhone? They haven’t released an updated Android version yet.Thanks, I looked and all of my permissions are set to on. I disabled the location and it still opens with 90 degrees and 85.3 mph. I then uninstalled and re-installed and still the same thing. Maybe a bug in the Android version?
Thanks for the help!
Perhaps you are using the "BP" tab rather than the "SP" tab? "SP" is for entering station pressure (absolute pressure). The "BP" function is for inputting barometric pressure which has ALREADY been adjusted for altitude.
You have that exactly backwards, if you are using the BP button and inputting station pressure, it will read a higher DA than actual. Unless of course, you are at sea level where BP and SP are the same thing.No, because if that were the case, the DA would be too low not too high. I don't know what it was doing, but it was f%^&ing up, and I have lost confidence in the App because it has been treated like a stepchild for far too long. And I will wager that the newest guy trying to fix it won't last a year working there, for the well known reasons nobody can work for more than a year there.
You have that exactly backwards, if you are using the BP button and inputting station pressure, it will read a higher DA than actual. Unless of course, you are at sea level where BP and SP are the same thing.
When I put in all your numbers and use the SP button, I get 6446 ft. DA. When I leave everything identical and toggle over to the BP button, I get 10,956 ft. DA.
PM sent.I have not been following did they get the Station Pressure input fixed yet?
Same here when i input a Zero Setting in Equipment screen and then go to Ballistics screen and add Cant it also give a NAN error.@Hundley I noticed that I get a NaN (Not a Number) error when both cant angle and zero setting have a value entered
View attachment 6957589
Just want to say again, thank you for being so responsive. We are fortunate to have such direct and immediate contact with the developers of the ballistic apps we all use everyday.@Kobyashi72 @rover308 you're right - it looks like this happens when a provide a positive value for Zero Setting, and a nonzero cant. We'll have to take a look and see what's going on. Thanks for pointing it out!
Any chance we can get more choices for Absolute? Stopping at 25inHg, seems weird.@Kobyashi72 @rover308 you're right - it looks like this happens when a provide a positive value for Zero Setting, and a nonzero cant. We'll have to take a look and see what's going on. Thanks for pointing it out!
He answered me back on this a bit ago, and said it would be in the update. Though I don't remember if he gave a date or what it would be adjusted to.Any chance we can get more choices for Absolute? Stopping at 25inHg, seems weird.
We have a lot of shooters even in the "plains" needing 23 inches, Hell Frank will need 24.5 ish in the flat lands -- much less anyone hunting or living in the Mountains.
I was getting that and saw a post about enabling access permissions to the camera and whatever else. I did that and it worked for me.Just got a new Samsung S9 and downloaded the app after using it on my galaxy S7, and now, it won't open. The start up screen is displayed and it just stays there. I tried deleting it and reinstalling it, to no avail
I was getting that and saw a post about enabling access permissions to the camera and whatever else. I did that and it worked for me.
Settings -> Apps -> Trasol App -> PermissionsWhere do you go to do that?
Can someone post a screenshot of the HUD?
Yes on the sight height. As for the Density Altitude, I'm not sure. I used the "capture" button next to the Density Altitude text in the app, and that's what it gave me.Is your sight height actually almost 3 inches, and is your DA actually -798 ft?
Your zero range is certainly at 100 yards. It might be s glitch. Go to your altitude menu and input your station pressure manually using the "SP" button and see what it tells you.Yes on the sight height. As for the Density Altitude, I'm not sure. I used the "capture" button next to the Density Altitude text in the app, and that's what it gave me.