I know this is tricky for you, link it to my post.I provided a link to the same study your preacher used. I am not going to read it to you.
Surely a couple of keystrokes are in order.
R
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below! Subscribers get more entries, check out the plans below for a better chance of winning!
Join the contest SubscribeI know this is tricky for you, link it to my post.I provided a link to the same study your preacher used. I am not going to read it to you.
up to, lol.Your preacher claimed the patients died due to Remdesivir. They were vicitms of Ebola. Remdesivir actually saved many of them that would have otherwise died. It did not work as well as other medications in the study, but that was not the claim. Ebola is up to 90% fatal. Are you claiming that the Ebola patients did not die from Ebola? Is that what you are now claiming?
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. The control group was defined by those given ZMApp, based on results from a previous study on that drug used to treat Ebola. Do you understand what that means? I think not. If you would like to read about THAT study, it is here:up to, lol.
more people died than in the control group.
they can manipulate the data any way they want, just like they can "prove" in their clinical "studies" that oxy isn't addictive, and then make billions pushing it on people that didn't really need opiates for their level of discomfort.
yeah, it means we'll never know how many people they actually killed.You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. The control group was defined by those given ZMApp, based on results from a previous study on that drug used to treat Ebola. Do you understand what that means? I think not. If you would like to read about THAT study, it is here:
It was define as "control" as it was already used in a previous study and it's efficacy had been evaluated. Do you understand what that means? If you cannot understand these concepts, I now understand why you tend to believe these folks that you like to quote. You will believe anything that comports with your preconceived ideas and baseless beliefs. It does not matter how many details and actual facts are provided. If someone says something you like, it is absolutely the truth. What a life to live, and a mind to waste.
Actually, that might be what it means to you. And that is fine, I can only provide you information, I can not make you understand it. And I will not try. But I will refute any other bullshit you post, and it will refute it just as this has. The fact that you choose to believe your preachers is irrelevant. The preachers that used this same study to lie.yeah, it means we'll never know how many people they actually killed.
just like we don't know how many covid patients would have survived if they weren't sedated and put on a vent.
You keep saying this like it’s some gotcha! moment. I don’t care what evidence you present to defend your shitty position. The fact you carry even this much water for “the science” and all the low status karens of the world is what disgusts me. You should be ashamed of yourselfIOW, you have nothing that supports the statement. And nothing that refutes what I posted. Why post? What was posted is an absolute lie, and I posted the actual study information. Either support the original statement, or prove mine wrong.
The fact that you disregard facts to protect your faith says everything. Karens? On your team?You keep saying this like it’s some gotcha! moment. I don’t care what evidence you present to defend your shitty position. The fact you carry even this much water for “the science” and all the low status karens of the world is what disgusts me. You should be ashamed of yourself
I do not "have a team" or "have my mind made up", except that I made my mind up to continually read, understand, and comprehend. Frankly, I question nearly everything. As opposed to many that simply accept anything and everything that meets their idea of what things appear to be in their made up world. Anyone that disregards facts by stating with no evidence that they are lies is exactly what is wrong with this country. Nobody cares about reality anymore. Everything that does not synch with their ideas is a lie. Automatically. No questions, no thought at all. Everyone marching in lockstep into the abyss. Quite sad.You all must enjoy wasting your time arguing with AZlongtroll. Just dont! He has his mind made, and his team chosen. Lets get past his BS. It just clogs the thread up with name calling, and makes you all look dumb. Nothing to prove here. 99% of us are on the same team.
Please, lets get back to posting more stories of the harm the vaccine causes, and less responding with a troll. Its a game for these types, just dont play!
Put the stupid fucker on ignore and the argumentative prick is gone for good.You all must enjoy wasting your time arguing with AZlongtroll. Just dont! He has his mind made, and his team chosen. Lets get past his BS. It just clogs the thread up with name calling, and makes you all look dumb. Nothing to prove here. 99% of us are on the same team.
Please, lets get back to posting more stories of the harm the vaccine causes, and less responding with a troll. Its a game for these types, just dont play!
I love it when my point is made for mePut the stupid fucker on ignore and the argumentative prick is gone for good.
Put the stupid fucker on ignore and the argumentative prick is gone for good.
Wasn’t some shill here claiming “It’s the cocaine!”
![]()
Warning to weekend cocaine users as man suffers deadly blood clots
A case report of an otherwise healthy patient in Wisconsin found using any amount of cocaine increases a person's risk of seizures, heart failure and severe lung damage.www.dailymail.co.uk
Or better yet how his sources are bank-rolled in many cases...I bet AZlong believed the studies on agent orange, the water on camp Legeune, the anthrax vax and a few others that said that they were safe. Well until they weren't.
I wonder what his opinion is on all the studies on saccrine and the other sugar substitutes that they said were safe when natural sugar is bad for you. Or don't eat red meat. Or eggs or......Or better yet how his sources are bank-rolled in many cases...
Control the authority info, control the narrative.
Its amazing how the leftists like AZLong have aligned with big pharma. Its like ignoring the true origins and goals of abortion....
Obviously, you cannot read. My source is the same as the individual that lied about the 53% fatality rate. He simply lied. That is all. And I am quite certain you are further left than I am.Or better yet how his sources are bank-rolled in many cases...
Control the authority info, control the narrative.
Its amazing how the leftists like AZLong have aligned with big pharma. Its like ignoring the true origins and goals of abortion....
And I am quite certain you are further left than I am.
By all means avoid addressing anything I said. I "cherry-picked" nothing. Simply responded to a post. Just spew insults and BS. Typical.The tactics are always the same. Cherry-pick the most extreme and obvious bs to claim "see, yall a bunch of <insert_label>.
And, of course stay away from discussions that are not obviously bs and require more depth. Its the same shit over and over with yall...
I am quite certain you are full of shit. Incapable of simple logic-based free-thought at best, and paid pharma shill influence-farm worker at worst.
Either way, we will need to just agree to disagree...buh bye now.
You should read what you posted.By all means avoid addressing anything I said. I "cherry-picked" nothing. Simply responded to a post. Just spew insults and BS. Typical.
By all means avoid addressing anything I said. I "cherry-picked" nothing. Simply responded to a post. Just spew insults and BS. Typical.
Not insults bro, pick those feelers up, they will be ok...I promise. And if you FEEL insulted, I offer you my apology (Lol).
Its not only the posts you respond to, its the entirety of work. Discussions and legit concerns, which are many dont seem to get much of your input...
That is cherry-pickin bro. And its the same tactic over and over. Its very one-sided and thus easy to identify that you are not acting in good-faith discourse.
Anywho, this post is as pointless as any other. Moreover, my last post to you on this topic.
Keep fighting the good fight...
Really?
"I am quite certain you are full of shit. Incapable of simple logic-based free-thought at best, and paid pharma shill influence-farm worker at worst."
Sure sounds like an insult. But I will not bother explaining it to you. Doubt that I could.. As to my "feelers" I assume you meant "feelings". And if you think you hurt my feelings, I can allay those fears. Worry not.
You obviously have no intention of discussing anything I have said, nor defend anything I have demonstrated to be a lie. So again, simply spewing BS and insults. Typical.