Is there some trick to getting these dialed in to where the image actually appears crisp/clear?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Parallax and diopter, otherwise you’ve got a lemon. I’d let someone else (that has experience as well) look through itIs there some trick to getting these dialed in to where the image actually appears crisp/clear?
I get that when my barrel is warm from inside and the temp is cold outside, but probably not the case here. Curious how this works out for you.I've got a bit of experience over the years, especially with my F-class scopes (Nightforce BR, Comp, Vortex GE, etc.). Kind of surprised me, after all the hub-bub here about these scopes that I couldn't quite get the target image to be sharp / crisp @ 100yds. Even on a cold crisp winter morning it looks just a hair out of focus, almost like when there's a bit of mirage. Wasn't sure if it's my eyes, or if that's just what a $600 chinese scope looks like.
I get that when my barrel is warm from inside and the temp is cold outside, but probably not the case here.
CameraLand is fast. Warranty is directly through DNT if needed.Better to go through DNT, or the reseller (Camera Land)?
XTR Pro edged out the DNT slightly with mirage but not really a scientific study since two different guns and different suppressors albeit same day, time, environment etc. It maybe edged over it into the shadows of trees near dusk at 30 power and 300 yards. Honestly it was close and used my ZCO at 27 as a comparison to both. It was clearly better but not exponentially.Well... got up to the range today with another local shooter (@Rover31) to have him put eyes on/thru the DNT, and compare/contrast with a few other scopes. We did all the eyeball comparisons with the guns still cold / no rounds through them, so no barrel/brake mirage, and it was the usual (for here) winter overcast sky. I think the consensus was that besides what constituted 'in focus' was very different for the two of us, the DNT was (to my eyes) actually a fair bit sharper than his Leupold Mk5HD, and not *quite* as sharp as my Burris XTRiii 5.5-30x. So... in the end, once I got it actually alongside some other glass where I could go back and forth between one and the next, on the same target at the same time... the DNT ended up looking a lot better than I thought. Guess I'll keep it around for a while longer![]()
Mine has numbers on the parallax, was this missing on yours?So sounds like people like this scope. It’s sharp with good contrast and withstands many repeated shots of a 50 bmg. It has a nice reticle and seems to track well. 25yd parallax. Plus it’s inexpensive.
So, as far as weaknesses, the DNT 7-35 isn’t great during overcast days, especially 20x+, and it’s even worse in low light.
The Zeiss S3 6-36 is both clearer and better at cutting through mirage.
The DNT comes with cheap turret screws that tend to strip.
It doesn’t have numbers on the parallax knob.
Personally, I wish it had locking turrets (at least a covered windage) but oh well.
What about CA? Seems like some saw some, others didn’t.
Eyebox? People say it’s tight at 30-35x, bit that’s to be expected. What I’m wondering is how does the eyebox compare to other scopes at the same mags?
Flare from backlit targets?
LMK if I missed anything.
I don’t own one. I was just recounting the feedback given thus far on this thread.Mine has numbers on the parallax, was this missing on yours?
Both of my DNTs have numbered parallax.
Cool. I shall change my original post.Yes from
25 yds - Infinity