Re: First 1911, need advice
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Hawk45</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Hawk45</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
BX1129 said:Here is the truth about 1911s.... they are a hobbyist gun
Yeah, I've never seen any jams or issues at comps with HK's, Glocks, M&P's or any other make/manufacture. Comps aren't a good place to gauge the quality of a gun b/c guys usually use reloads and have them way loaded way down. They usually have messed with about every part of the gun they can to boot. Heck, you even see it in production class's if they are known not to check.
If you want a defensive gun, buy it the way it was meant to work from the factory and leave it that way. </div></div>
You've never seen other types of guns jam at a competition? I'm not sure if that's a joke or not. You probably haven't seen HKs jam because they are generally not competitive because their bore axis is too high and SA/DA is not popular with competitors in either IDPA or USPSA. If you haven't seen all types of gun malfunctions imaginable, however, you must not have been to many matches. I have staffed major tournaments and I have seen every type of gun malfunction.
The suggestion that competition ammo is "loaded way down" is complete and utter bullshit and illustrates that you actually don't know what you're talking about. In both IDPA and USPSA, the only commonly-used caliber that is typically loaded well-below its factory loading is .45 ACP. My .40 ammo is just as hot, and perhaps hotter, than most factory .40 ammo, and my 9mm ammo probably has more recoil than most factory 115 grain loadings, although it uses heavier bullets. The principles of practical shooting would be violated if we didn't value power. Or did you miss all that DVC stuff?
Production is not a class, nor does equipment put one in a "class." Equipment puts one in a "division," and neither of the major handgun shooting sports demand that one not modify their gun. The gun that I carry on the street has different sights and some internal parts when compared to how it came from the factory. Should I not carry it? You haven't demonstrated any reason why this is a problem.
And for the record, and I've said this on here before, possessives are not plurals. "Class's" is not a word. The plural of "class" is "classes." The possessive is "class'."
If you want to suggest that my guns are somehow not "defensive" because they have their triggers changed out, or because I've adjusted the overtravel stop, or because I don't like the factory sights, then so be it, but keep that trash to yourself unless you wish to come here and give reasons why the gun that I carry every day is insufficient to defend myself on account of not being as it came from the factory.
and +1 on the comment about letting a bunch of manufacturers make Glocks and let's see how reliable they are...
The 1911 is not inherently unreliable. It's just imperative that users choose one that is, because each one is different.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: BigJoe</div><div class="ubbcode-body">oh my god you 1911 fanboys you have no freaking clue what you are talking about. MARSOC and fore recon gets guns that are completely rebuilt and get serviced every 5-10k rounds plus they have trained armorers from crane in their teams that replace parts as needed. LAPD and HRT both used/use 1911's and have the same replacement policies and if you think they are stock off the shelf guns you are insane as well. i'm taking nothing away from the platform there is a reason its still kicking 100 years later. but if your goin to use it hard you need to know what you are getting yourself into. i have posted numerous times on these freaking 1911 threads from people who have more rounds down range with 1911's then 8 of you combined saying things about the MIM parts, service life, reliability and you don't say shit but a couple guys say the same things and you jump all over their case. I have a 1911 being built and am buying 2 more, but i also shoot glock, HK, sig doesn't matter they all have their use and their faults. stop being cult fanboys and open your fucking eyes. jesus christ this is the same thread we see time and time again. </div></div>
Not sure what this is trying to add, unless it's to say that with high round counts, all guns will need maintenance. I reject the suggestion that the 1911 needs to be rebuilt every "5-10k rounds." The usual criticism of the 1911 is that it's not a design that allows for replacing parts without fitting, and many people don't want to pay someone to fit a part to their gun.