Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below! Subscribers get more entries, check out the plans below for a better chance of winning!
Join the contest SubscribeNo shit. They didn't make many Walker Colts, only 1100, 100 were issued to the Texas Rangers.Would love to know the story of that…
It’s not a walker. After looking closer the grip frame appears to be brass and the cylinder looks more like an 1860 Navy or copy of.No shit. They didn't make many Walker Colts, only 1100, 100 were issued to the Texas Rangers.
The story is probably a photographer stuck those things together and took a picture.It’s not a walker. After looking closer the grip frame appears to be brass and the cylinder looks more like an 1860 Navy or copy of.
Walker trigger gaurd and grip frames were brass. But I thought it looked too light for Walker.It’s not a walker. After looking closer the grip frame appears to be brass and the cylinder looks more like an 1860 Navy or copy of.
Hard to tell with the rust, but it appears to have a latch at the front of the loading lever, which the Walker lacked.Walker trigger gaurd and grip frames were brass. But I thought it looked too light for Walker.
![]()
Hard to tell with the rust, but it appears to have a latch at the front of the loading lever, which the Walker lacked.
Would love to know the story of that…
No shit. They didn't make many Walker Colts, only 1100, 100 were issued to the Texas Rangers.
It’s not a walker. After looking closer the grip frame appears to be brass and the cylinder looks more like an 1860 Navy or copy of.
Walker trigger gaurd and grip frames were brass. But I thought it looked too light for Walker.
![]()
That is an 1860 Army revolver not the 1861 Navy. The big give-away is the rebated cylinder. The 1861 Navy was shorter and did not have a rebated cylinder because it was a .36 caliber versus the .44 caliber.Hard to tell with the rust, but it appears to have a latch at the front of the loading lever, which the Walker lacked.
The image does not appear to depict a real event but an artist's rendering Paul ChesleyThat is an 1860 Army revolver not the 1861 Navy. The big give-away is the rebated cylinder. The 1861 Navy was shorter and did not have a rebated cylinder because it was a .36 caliber versus the .44 caliber.
1860 Army:
![]()
1861 Navy:
![]()
Those Navys were the Raquel Welchs of the gun world.1861 Navy:
![]()
Shout out to the Hilton Home Suites or whatever it's called... not only one of the nicest rooms I ever stayed in (really well-thought-out...) but they have Marines covered at the free hot breakfast bar!
View attachment 8075646View attachment 8075647
I assume these are for the waffles? Or do people eat them raw?
Sirhr
PS. They had Froot Loops! My Favorite cereal!
The crayons are there in case any Marines are staying the night.![]()
duh! Their obviously expecting a platoon of marines to stop by for breakfast….
The most successful Elk hunters had deep roots in the logging families. They "hunted" (no rifle) Elk year round from the seat of that logging equipment and the Elk got used to them being in the woods.Yup 05-06 winter working Cat-side sawing poles- guys on the crew loaded their elk with a Log max and I’d take a dump trailer full of DF/ L rounds home every weekend!
How to get an entire neighborhood drunk:
Lol! Yep! The kid on the Feller-Buncher would sometimes have to poke at the cow elk with a newly felled tree to get em away from the piles so he could bunch em up.The most successful Elk hunters had deep roots in the logging families. They "hunted" (no rifle) Elk year round from the seat of that logging equipment and the Elk got used to them being in the woods.
Back a few decades ago, we made that and called it jungle juice.
Man, oh, man would the girls drink it