Re: GAP crusader vs hospitaller?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: SS-8541-dono</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: gstaylorg</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: SS-8541-dono</div><div class="ubbcode-body">i vote hospitaller , it cost more but you are getting a better product and i know everyone is going to bitch and moan that better is my own opinion and not fact but the hospitaller is a larger up front investment but well worth it to upgrade over the crusader and if you ever have to sell it you will more coin for the hospitaller no question. <span style="color: #FF0000">as for shooting and accuracy there is nothing the crusader can do that the hospitaller couldnt do better</span> </div></div>
I have both, I've put thousands of rounds through them, and my impression is a little different. They are both so good and so close, it's anyone's call. As you noted, the Hospitaller is more expensive up front. I doubt however, that its resale value is going to be that much higher relative to the initial investment that the Crusader. Regardless of the price, neither is markedly superior to the other, and ultimately, a preference one way or the other will likely come down to what the individual shooter likes, not any measurable difference in quality of the rifles. You simply can't go wrong with either one. </div></div>
if george called you up and told you he would build you one for free which one would you tell him you wanted? </div></div>
A Crusader without question. Not that I think that is likely to happen anytime soon (LOL). Seriously, I'm not trying to stir the pot or step on anyone's toes, but as I stated earlier, to me they're so close it comes down to very small differences and personal preference. The OP asked people's opinions on the two and I happen to have both, so I posted what I think.
I am fortunate that the difference in price between the two doesn't matter. I recently received a new GAP that is essentially a Crusader with a 28" pipe and my original Crusader is scheduled to arrive back from GAP tomorrow (rebarrel). Costwise, I could have gone with whatever I wanted. I chose the Crusader platform for the recent build just because I prefer it by a very small margin over the Hospitaller, the differences being ergonomics, etc., rather than accuracy or durability, as I mentioned above. I can certainly appreciate that someone else could go the other way. However, both of those rifles shoot so well, I seriously doubt that most shooters could ever substantiate the claim that one was better than the other with hard data. With either one, the shooter is going to be the limiting factor, which in my opinion is exactly where you want things to be.
As far as any issues for the Hospitaller extractor as mentioned above, all I can say is that I've never had any issues or noticed a difference with either. The extractor would not be a good reason to choose one over the other IMO.