-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
Maggie’s Garland vs Vanderstock?
- Thread starter GBMaryland
- Start date
OMG, you're a fucking criminal!!!
What the ATF lawyer is saying is that that is not considered an unfinished receiver. Basically, she's taking that stance that no reasonable person would consider that a receiver... which fails the sniff test because many of the Agents will drive a truck through reasonableness.
She DID say that they ATF considers that if it takes more than 8 hours work to convert a receiver, then it's not a receiver / not intent. Which, if I have a milling machine, then all of those are unfinished receivers.
What the ATF lawyer is saying is that that is not considered an unfinished receiver. Basically, she's taking that stance that no reasonable person would consider that a receiver... which fails the sniff test because many of the Agents will drive a truck through reasonableness.
She DID say that they ATF considers that if it takes more than 8 hours work to convert a receiver, then it's not a receiver / not intent. Which, if I have a milling machine, then all of those are unfinished receivers.
More bullshit from the ATF but I expect they are going to win. This case was a facial challenge which means that the plaintiff's are arguing that the law should be overturned because it is always unconstitutional. That is a really high bar to clear and a stupid way to challenge any law. The only silver lining of this turd sandwich is that it probably won't be too bad for the second amendment because of the 6:3 conservative majority and the type of case it is. Who knows, maybe the Honorable Justice Clarence Thomas will surprise us all and pull out something nice out of his hat for us...
