• HideTV Updates Coming Monday

    HideTV will be down on Monday for updates. We'll let you all know as soon as it's back up and message @alexj-12 with any questions!

  • Win an RIX Storm S3 Thermal Imaging Scope!

    To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below! Subscribers get more entries, check out the plans below for a better chance of winning!

    Join the contest Subscribe

Maggie’s Garland vs Vanderstock?

FS. Zero percent receivers!

Get them before they are banned!

IMG_4623.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: lroseen and Baron23
OMG, you're a fucking criminal!!!

What the ATF lawyer is saying is that that is not considered an unfinished receiver. Basically, she's taking that stance that no reasonable person would consider that a receiver... which fails the sniff test because many of the Agents will drive a truck through reasonableness.

She DID say that they ATF considers that if it takes more than 8 hours work to convert a receiver, then it's not a receiver / not intent. Which, if I have a milling machine, then all of those are unfinished receivers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baron23
More bullshit from the ATF but I expect they are going to win. This case was a facial challenge which means that the plaintiff's are arguing that the law should be overturned because it is always unconstitutional. That is a really high bar to clear and a stupid way to challenge any law. The only silver lining of this turd sandwich is that it probably won't be too bad for the second amendment because of the 6:3 conservative majority and the type of case it is. Who knows, maybe the Honorable Justice Clarence Thomas will surprise us all and pull out something nice out of his hat for us...