D
Deleted member 10043
Guest
You can't shoot if you can't see. My vision used to be "so-called" 20/20. Now it is more like 20/35. In other words, what a normal person sees at 35 feet I see at 20 feet. Corrected vision or not and all other things relevant I started out on the Remington Model 40 using what a young Marine in Vietnam used, 3-9x40. That was fine for a while. I moved up to what a young Marine would use on the M40A1, which is fixed 10x. That has been working okay but I'm noticing anything past 400 meters is getting worse on accuracy over time. So, I did a little weighted average calculations and determined that with my vision I should be using at least 14x power scope to get my sight handicap on par with someone with 20/20 vision. So, I purchased an identical scope as my 10x only it is 16x. That should compensate for several years of normal eye sight deterioration. I hope. Anyway, it sucks.
Corrected vision and scope magnification aside, normal eye deterioration has to be relevant to accuracy. I can't possibly be seeing the same sight picture of an 10" x 8" target as a person with "normal" eyesight at 550 meters using the same 10x scope.
I guess this topic falls under range report. It's a phenomenon I've been experiencing over a course of many years.
Corrected vision and scope magnification aside, normal eye deterioration has to be relevant to accuracy. I can't possibly be seeing the same sight picture of an 10" x 8" target as a person with "normal" eyesight at 550 meters using the same 10x scope.
I guess this topic falls under range report. It's a phenomenon I've been experiencing over a course of many years.