We're about to begin a process on Sierra M/K 175 projectiles, and we're going to use Hexagonal Boron Nitride. After a number of correspondences with the maker of the rifle, he's agreed that HBN is superior to Moly in that HBN doesn't have the eventual adverse effects on the bore inherent in Moly coatings.
This rifle <span style="font-style: italic">must</span> use a coated projectile to gain the warrantee of moa/1,000 yards from the maker as it is specifically designed to function in that manner.
The rifle is a dedicated SMK 175 build in that the chamber and throat are specifically reamed for that projectile profile and no other. We're avid Berger VLD users, but they won't work with this particular rifle.
We have a Thumlers Tumbler and a source for BHN, and the process seems to be a simple one but its also something in 45 years of reloading I've not yet done, thus my enquiry.
Has anyone here performed a similar process with Moly, or better yet, with HBN specifically? Any inside info would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks you
zfk55
This rifle <span style="font-style: italic">must</span> use a coated projectile to gain the warrantee of moa/1,000 yards from the maker as it is specifically designed to function in that manner.
The rifle is a dedicated SMK 175 build in that the chamber and throat are specifically reamed for that projectile profile and no other. We're avid Berger VLD users, but they won't work with this particular rifle.
We have a Thumlers Tumbler and a source for BHN, and the process seems to be a simple one but its also something in 45 years of reloading I've not yet done, thus my enquiry.
Has anyone here performed a similar process with Moly, or better yet, with HBN specifically? Any inside info would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks you
zfk55