Google, Apple, MS, Amazon, the payment system companies, MSM are all "progressive" or hi jacked by same. I see algorithmic mass cancelation. Imagine no email. no web access
I'm putting this in a separate note because it's different.
Something to seriously consider is that with their new machine learning systems, they could just as easily leave your account active but you are not getting the messages that people send you and the messages other folks get are not what you are sending them. They could easily be faking your stuff after having done a bit of analysis on your grammar / spelling / interests and such.
Sure, you'd be able to eventually catch on, but they may be able to cause some issues when faking folks out a couple times, or modifying what you said.
I used to do enough ParaRP to understand how small changes in a text block can be made that alter the message completely (hence why everyone in ParaRP kept chat logs to prevent cheating).
Here is an interesting quote back from 2013 from Ann Barnhardt that I think is pretty relevant:
"
August 21, ARSH 2013 by
Ann Barnhardt. Which brings me to something I have wanted to talk about for a while. We need to talk about “handles”, “aliases” and “noms de guerre”. Guys, while that tactic may have been sound in previous wars, it is going to be a disaster in this war. It needs to stop. Let me explain. Let’s say I go to some gathering somewhere of counter-revolutionaries. A middle-aged white dude walks up to me and says, “Hi. I’m ‘Disturbed Citizen’ from the Mid-South Shotgun Shooters blog. We have corresponded via email.” Now stop and think about this. How can I possibly, possibly confirm that this guy, who I have indeed corresponded with via email, actually is who he says he is? We all now know for a metaphysical certitude that all of our email has been logged and may have been read by FEDGOV. We MUST assume that FEDGOV is every bit as knowledgable of our data and correspondences as we are. How do I know that this man standing before me really is ‘Disturbed Citizen’? There is no possible way for me to confirm this. I don’t know what ‘Disturbed Citizen’s’ name is, so asking for an I.D. is pointless. I don’t know what ‘Disturbed Citizen’ looks like, so visual confirmation is off the table. And the enemy has FULL ACCESS to all correspondence between myself and the real ‘Disturbed Citizen’, and thus can quote and make references WITH FULL CONTEXT AND DETAIL.
Do you see this? Given the tactical situation, the proper course is NOT for us to hide. That ship sailed a LONG time ago. The only thing that hiding behind aliases, handles and noms de guerre accomplishes is opening a HUGE door to the enemy such that they can infiltrate us with ease never-before-seen in the annals of war. The proper tactic is to BE NOT AFRAID and come out from behind aliases and handles NOW.
Now, take me, for example. If I were to roll into some event somewhere, people would know who I was by name and by sight, and if they did not know who I was, I could quickly and easily confirm my identity and bona fides.
I know it is a big step, but just read over what I have said and then THINK. The tactical table has been inverted. If you all try to fight this war as if it hasn’t, you will get your butt handed to you and you will deserve it. Enough of this prevent defense. The only way to win is to fix bayonets and charge, and in my considered opinion, step one should be establishing identity so that we at least have a chance at a modicum of OPSEC. Counterintuitive? Absolutely. But the truth often is counterintuitive.
August 21, ARSH 2013 by
Ann Barnhardt. "
