Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seriously, though. What was SOP when dealing with an aggressive dog? Punch it right in the nose, roundhouse kick to the face, sap it, get the billy club involved, what?
Seriously, though. What was SOP when dealing with an aggressive dog? Punch it right in the nose, roundhouse kick to the face, sap it, get the billy club involved, what?
He did hit, indirectly, the girl.He could easily have hit the girl.
Yep, she'll likely be scared forever and never trust a cop again. Its jackass's like him that make it bad for all decent cops. I hpe they crucify him. Anybody know WHY he was in the house to begin with?He did hit, indirectly, the girl.
Don’t most officers carry a taser on their duty belt now? Don’t know how well that would work but I can tell you a cattle prod does. Grandpa as a Sherrif carried one in the trunk for just such occasions.
The issue with a taser on a dog is you have to remember to hold it sideways so both prongs hit the animal (taser prongs have vertical spreads for humans and dogs are obviously more horizontally shaped). So, unless you train to do this (very unlikely), you’ll probably miss.
There is no static SOP, but firing your service weapon means you need to be justified using deadly force, be it on a person or an animal. Each situation is entirely different.
Personally, I always pull out my baton if a dog charges me. Usually either moving directly at the dog (never back down from a dog, it will only become more aggressive) or a tap with a steel baton enough to let them know you mean business is plenty.
My own personal belief is also that this job comes with getting into fights, be it with people or animals. So, a dog would likely have to have pretty good hold of me to discharge my weapon. That’s a personal choice, so I can’t speak for other LEOs.
Also, rabies shots are in the shoulder now and no big deal.
Good on ya dude. Anybody that thinks a cops job is easy is an idiot and thank you for the job you do. I challenge anybody to show me a discipline that doesn’t have idiots in their midst.......
Officers responded to the report of a domestic disturbance and suicidal person at a home near 13th and Hillside. Police had said officers were told a 33-year-old man in the home had held a gun in his mouth and choked a dog.
The family's attorney, Charles O'Hara, tells KAKE News by the time police by the time police arrived, the situation has been resolved and the couple was standing outside, with no weapon and ready to talk to police.
"While the officers were retrieving the gun, a mid-sized mixed breed dog charged at one of the officers," police said in news release after the incident. "The officer pulled his service weapon and shot at the dog, missing it."
The bullet struck the floor and broke into fragments, one of them ricocheting and striking a 9-year-old girl in the forehead just above her right eye. She was hospitalized and released later that evening.
http://www.kake.com/story/37174772/...ve-after-9-year-old-hurt-in-shooting-incident
If you think your job being hard makes it okay for you to shoot innocent people you should be in jail.
He's been fired and charged with felonies. Trial in August.
He's been fired and charged with felonies. Trial in August.
Link or explanation of the charges?
Reason I ask, if the prosecuting attorney charges him with something very high on the list of charges, it makes it much harder to compel a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
Never mind, found it. Aggravated Battery.
Might be tough for a jury here. Cop is going to say the dog attacked him so fast he had to make a split second decision.
Jury is going to have to decide if they believe he acted knowingly and recklessly and not inside the scope of his job. Not an easy thing for an unbiased jury to do.
Will be interesting to see, but I expect the cop to be acquitted and the city to pay the family a large sum of money.
y'all ever Google?
"The former officer is charged with aggravated battery, a level 8 felony. Prosecutors say Betts acted unlawfully and recklessly causing bodily harm to the child.
Betts entered a not guilty plea in the case. His trial is set for Aug. 20."
lets see how it turns out, but again , the problem is more complicated than one "bad cop".
That's an interesting take on it.
As gun owners who never did anything wrong with our own firearms we should have a better understanding of how erroneous and unfounded damining all on the actions of one can be.
Agreed, Tucker, but a quick scroll through Youtube will show that this is, if not endemic, at least wide spread, and not just regarding dogs. Seems like the balance has shifted from when I was a kid " Shoot as an absolute last resort" to "Shoot first, and do all you can to weasel out of your mistake." I see a number of reasons for this, none of them good.
Thats why I say this is a disrespect to all the good cops out there.
The odds of being shot by a cop during an encounter is literally less than zero.
...