I still like Mil and I'm partial to the new Horus reticle .Both are wrong, it's 30mm an IPHY.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I still like Mil and I'm partial to the new Horus reticle .Both are wrong, it's 30mm an IPHY.
Nope that not for me, only one Bridge rectifier, plus not near enough variable resistors, or SCR's to suit me.
Not to mention no reactor/choke . One good spike and .......Nope that not for me, only one Bridge rectifier, plus not near enough variable resistors, or SCR's to suit me.
Eisenhower's farewell speech may have clues to what we see all over this rock at times,... Money is a powerful motivator to many an some will throw morals right out the window for same, if enough is involved.
Didn't totally fail . They managed to blow a Ukranian jet full of civilians out of the sky . Please note that was sarcasm and an attempt to illustrate both the irony of the situation and the technological , tactical and command ineptitude of Iran . Truly angry and sad cor the innocents .There is truth in that statement.
Trying to find the strategic benefit here...
-Save face to the hardliners death to America crowd? Seems unlikely. Information online is wayyy to easy to get these days...
-Was it truly a failed attack attempt by Iran? Or some proxy? Maybe, but perhaps I have fallen prey to media misinformation re: Iranian military capabilities...but a nation on the verge of nuclear capability would have been 1 for 30, right?
-Or, was the lauch to bait the US into further escalation? US retailiates, Iran gets more sympathy on the world stage and of course dem/leftists melt creating more fear etc. And of course a retaliation would give them an excuse to retaliate even further and unite the people blah blah.
The last seems the most logical. An attack that "purposely" failed to bait the US into attacking further.
But what would Iran really gain from this one-upmanship? Thats a zero sum game for them in the end...maybe they truly DGAF?
So IMO that also falls apart. I dont doubt many of the followers are willing to die for "death to the America" but are the leaders?....doubtful. Politicians are very similar everywhere...hence why your statement makes quite a lot of sense.
OS
Who says it was Iran? Remember in confusion there is opportunity an confusion is easily sowed when people do not thing things true 100%. We went to war in SE/A over an out right lie. Who benefited from that, why was the S/S trust fund used to pay for that war? Blind trust is dangerous,...
Trump Tweeted right after killing Salmenallia Iran never won a war or lost a negotiation. That was the way out for the mullahs. With the strong arm gone they could save face for the people and not get wiped off the face of the earth.There is truth in that statement.
Trying to find the strategic benefit here...
-Save face to the hardliners death to America crowd? Seems unlikely. Information online is wayyy to easy to get these days...
-Was it truly a failed attack attempt by Iran? Or some proxy? Maybe, but perhaps I have fallen prey to media misinformation re: Iranian military capabilities...but a nation on the verge of nuclear capability would have been 1 for 30, right?
-Or, was the lauch to bait the US into further escalation? US retailiates, Iran gets more sympathy on the world stage and of course dem/leftists melt creating more fear etc. And of course a retaliation would give them an excuse to escalate even further and unite the people blah blah.
The last seems the most logical. An attack that "purposely" failed to bait the US into attacking further.
But what would Iran really gain from this one-upmanship? Thats a zero sum game for them in the end...maybe they truly DGAF?
So IMO that also falls apart. I dont doubt many of the followers are willing to die for "death to the America" but are the leaders?....doubtful. Politicians are very similar everywhere...hence why your statement makes quite a lot of sense.
The crowd likes .45 and Mil . Police Chief says 9mm and MOA .
*crosseyed ugly drag queen .40 S&W waves as a trail of snot falls on his upper lip....The crowd likes .45 and Mil . Police Chief says 9mm and MOA .
Dafug . I got a fucked up visual of RuPaul with a bad cold .*crosseyed ugly drag queen .40 S&W waves as a trail of snot falls on his upper lip....
QFuck'em all.
Hey! I shoot limited major and S.S.major using 40 if that wasn't so funny I'd be butthurt!?*crosseyed ugly drag queen .40 S&W waves as a trail of snot falls on his upper lip....
So if I’m following along some folks believe this action will deter Iran from continuing its nuclear program. I honestly don’t buy this theory, I actually believe this will just embolden them. Iran attacked US bases with ballistic missiles and we so far have backed down, this shows weakness in the region that emboldens other state actors to act out.
Why would Iran warn Iraq of the missile strike if you are to believe what you typed? Trump removed the muscle of Iran. He enforced the hard line that he most likely was key in making the doctrine. Now the Mullahs have some room to negotiate and no junkyard dog. I'd agree that nukes are not going to happen because of Israel. As on In living color "Homie don't play that shit" Besides...So if I’m following along some folks believe this action will deter Iran from continuing its nuclear program. I honestly don’t buy this theory, I actually believe this will just embolden them. Iran attacked US bases with ballistic missiles and we so far have backed down, this shows weakness in the region that emboldens other state actors to act out.
Just remember kiddies. Trump may not be a smoker, but he sure as hell knows how to light up a camel.
Iran attacked US bases with ballistic missiles and we so far have backed down...
That Sirhr, is a quality meme.View attachment 7220900
And as for the post-game analysis... and the assertion that Trump backed down...
I would respectfully disagree. He got his man... took out the head of Iran's terror wing. Then his own US opposition LOST THEIR MINDS in public and defended Iran, terrorists, billions of dollars on pallets, said the line Endless War dozens of time on camera... Joe Biden, the number one idiot running for nomination... could not remember that he was on camera supporting Iraq War and saying "I'd do it again..." And yesterday claims he didn't. While video of him saying "I did" is rolling next to it... Then Iran fires bottle rockets onto an Iraq base that is clear... cleans out a Quonset hut and some cactus. And claims victory... while their own people are changing "You Lie" to their government.
This is as good as it gets. Everyone has egg on their face. Except Trump and the DoD who pulled this off beautifully.
And I will give credit to Greg Gutfeld (the best, most sarcastic mind in media) who was the first person I hear saying "We probably did Irain a favor." There are more than a few who would like to get the hardliners out of the way. Acing Sulimani was a way to tamp down on their hardliners. Did we have a 'deal?' Doubt it. But the funeral was for show. You can bet on it. I would bet that the trampelings were made up, too. Another ham-fisted attempt by the regime to stir up "Death to America" sentiment.
The best part of this has nothing to do with Iran. They will keep being assholes until their people do Mussolini on the mullahs. This got us hours of videotape of the 'real' Death To America scum. And they are all reporting to Crazy Nancy and 'Cryin Chuck...
Cheers,
Sirhr
Unfortunately we can see he doesn’t. Iran just made us look bad and Trump backed down. So far this has been Typical Trump rhetoric where he runs his mouth with a big bark but he is truly a little poodle. I hope he proves me wrong and mans up in the name of the US.Why would Iran warn Iraq of the missile strike if you are to believe what you typed? Trump removed the muscle of Iran. He enforced the hard line that he most likely was key in making the doctrine. Now the Mullahs have some room to negotiate and no junkyard dog. I'd agree that nukes are not going to happen because of Israel. As on In living color "Homie don't play that shit" Besides...
View attachment 7221124
He removed their ability to expand and project power in the region. This was after killing 25 of the militia that killed the contractor. You see it as backing down when he told them he would respond if one American is hurt or killed. None were.Unfortunately we can see he doesn’t. Iran just made us look bad and Trump backed down. So far this has been Typical Trump rhetoric where he runs his mouth with a big bark but he is truly a little poodle. I hope he proves me wrong and mans up in the name of the US.
Unfortunately we can see he doesn’t. Iran just made us look bad and Trump backed down. So far this has been Typical Trump rhetoric where he runs his mouth with a big bark but he is truly a little poodle. I hope he proves me wrong and mans up in the name of the US.
Iran warnings Iraq has been a rumor nothing more from what I can gather.
They killed one of us and we responded by killing one of them. Then they escalated launching ballistic missiles at two of are bases. Trump came out on his pedestal and backed down on National TV the next morning. Hate to say this but I think the last president would have handled business, Trump was to worried the market would continue to tank is the rumors going around in DC.Us?
Look bad?
Poodle?
.....
So killing just the one fella removed the ability to expand ? I would guess there are multiple people lined up ready to fill his seat, but not sure anyone truly knows.He removed their ability to expand and project power in the region. This was after killing 25 of the militia that killed the contractor. You see it as backing down when he told them he would respond if one American is hurt or killed. None were.
Last May he convinced Russia not to sell them the Sukhoi Su-35. In November he put B52's in theatre so they know that they can lose their oil business quite rapidly. You can see anyway you wish however he removed the 2 top leaders and they lobbed some missiles after they sent word of exactly where they were going and when they would do it.
You mean this president?They killed one of us and we responded by killing one of them. Then they escalated launching ballistic missiles at two of are bases. Trump came out on his pedestal and backed down on National TV the next morning. Hate to say this but I think the last president would have handled business, Trump was to worried the market would continue to tank is the rumors going around in DC.
You obviously have no idea what that man was. The newly appointed Quds leader is in his 60's also. The intel it took to put that strike together means that the Iranians have major leaks throughout their forces or allies or both. Goes hand in hand with the civil unrest they have witnessed.So killing just the one fella removed the ability to expand ? I would guess there are multiple people lined up ready to fill his seat, but not sure anyone truly knows.
I was under the impression they wouldn’t sell the SU-35 till UN arms embargo was up. I’m aware we pulled out but I was under the impression they planned to buy banned military equipment from China and Russia.
Yep now we just need a pic of Trump doing the same. The difference is Obama handed Iran back their own cash. Trump allowed Iran to drop missiles on American bases then went on National TV and backed down.
I wasn’t happy with Obama but Trump made us look weak In the eyes of other Nations.
interesting perspective, any chance you can back some of this up with actual data ? I will open my terminal and show one picture but hey there is no QE.You obviously have no idea what that man was. The newly appointed Quds leader is in his 60's also. The intel it took to put that strike together means that the Iranians have major leaks throughout their forces or allies or both. Goes hand in hand with the civil unrest they have witnessed.
If Trump didn't step in they would be flying the Su-35's now.
The 17 Trillion dollars in our stock markets create the illusion of big swings because of the bot traders and the sheer amount of money moving. They swing right back once whatever started the trend is diagnosed A 400 point swing in a 3 trillion dollar market is beyond alarming and percentage-wise looks like a plane crash on a graph. That same 400 point swing in a 17trillion dollar market is reported as alarming by the talking heads however percentage-wise it is barely a tick on a graph
It's constantly reported how well Obama's stock market fared vs Trump He made a 150% increase whereas Trump has only a 50% increase. Well 150% of 10 dollars is 25 dollars vs 50% growth of 100 dollars is 150 dollars which would you rather make? The actual amounts are alot more than that but the gains in dollars for Trump are not caused by Quantitative Easing which gave the Obama years the huge stock growth without any job growth. The Trump growth is from the private sector which is why he has seen the incredible job growth that supports the market. It is also why the bottom third has seen the highest wage growth percentage-wise. Again I'd much rather have 3% more of 450k than 15% more of 40k.
Obama gave the Mullahs the Shah and the people of Iran's money you really should read more
Were could a slightly younger person find out more of what really happened without all the bs?OS
Who says it was Iran? Remember in confusion there is opportunity an confusion is easily sowed when people do not thing things true 100%. We went to war in SE/A over an out right lie. Who benefited from that, why was the S/S trust fund used to pay for that war? Blind trust is dangerous,...
You would have to start with the history of V/N & Ike (Eisenhower),... then listen to his Farewell address. Then read about JFK until he was smoked, then on to what Johnson did about V/N in 1965. Also pay close attention to what happened to the S/S trust fund an way it was moved into the general fund. Then trace Johnsons MIC holdings. After you have done that the truth will be very evident. What better way to keep your industry flowing than sprinkling an little hate an discontent thru back ally scum bags, who have no morals an will do anything for money. Every corporation has body's barried an your gov an it's supplyers are no different. When a Trillon bucks are on the line, whats a few life's?,... Many do that kind of math,... not just the Klintons,...Were could a slightly younger person find out more of what really happened without all the bs?
@Tahoe
Put down the bong sir.
Step away.
This worked out quite well. Bad guy dead. Bad guy’s country puts on show of outrage, including missiles into US base that was forewarned. Bad guy’s country looks tough. Really, bad guy’s country knows that the circle jerk is up, President Trump means it, and will kill more of us without hesitation unless we shape up.
Kinda like kids. Spank one for breaking the rules in front of the others. Others shape up.
Pretty basic.
There is truth in that statement.
Trying to find the strategic benefit here...
-Save face to the hardliners death to America crowd? Seems unlikely. Information online is wayyy to easy to get these days...
-Was it truly a failed attack attempt by Iran? Or some proxy? Maybe, but perhaps I have fallen prey to media misinformation re: Iranian military capabilities...but a nation on the verge of nuclear capability would have been 1 for 30, right?
-Or, was the lauch to bait the US into further escalation? US retailiates, Iran gets more sympathy on the world stage and of course dem/leftists melt creating more fear etc. And of course a retaliation would give them an excuse to escalate even further and unite the people blah blah.
The last seems the most logical. An attack that "purposely" failed to bait the US into attacking further.
But what would Iran really gain from this one-upmanship? Thats a zero sum game for them in the end...maybe they truly DGAF?
So IMO that also falls apart. I dont doubt many of the followers are willing to die for "death to the America" but are the leaders?....doubtful. Politicians are very similar everywhere...hence why your statement makes quite a lot of sense.
So what’s the consensus , Trump backed down ? Or are we calling this a win. I’m confused why we would allow anyone to drop ballistic Missiles on a US base and we just walk away. Sanctions don’t hinder Iran when China and Russia will continue doing business with them.