I am torn between two riflescopes and would appreciate the input.
1. Leica Magnus 2.4-16×56 i
Pros are greater magnification, larger aperture for more light sensitivity, adjustable parallax.
2. Leica Magnus 1.8-12x50 i
Pros are less expensive, slimmer profile (smaller aperture and no parallax knob), KISS (no parallax adjustment is also one less thing to break)
My use case is a on top of a Sako 85 Finnlight II in 30-06, aimed (pun intended) towards hunting elk in Wyoming.
Secondary question: is a BDC turret worth it for hunting purposes? I have never used one.
1. Leica Magnus 2.4-16×56 i
Pros are greater magnification, larger aperture for more light sensitivity, adjustable parallax.
2. Leica Magnus 1.8-12x50 i
Pros are less expensive, slimmer profile (smaller aperture and no parallax knob), KISS (no parallax adjustment is also one less thing to break)
My use case is a on top of a Sako 85 Finnlight II in 30-06, aimed (pun intended) towards hunting elk in Wyoming.
Secondary question: is a BDC turret worth it for hunting purposes? I have never used one.