As the title implies, is the ATACR really that great of a value that it justifies the price?
I know we're comparing a FFP to a SFP here, but if I'm looking for a general purpose optic to Run N Gun with and engage targets from 25m-600m, should I save twice as much for the ATACR over a Razor? I've shot guns with both optics, and both seem very nice, but I guess I'm merely looking for people who have more experience on both to shed some light on the more nuanced aspects of each.
I'll be upgrading from a Vortex Viper PST 1-4. Either one of these two will be a noticable improvement for Run N Gun comps. I value durability over most anything else, and am willing to pay more if it means the difference of being able to trust my equipment.
I'm not rich, so choosing the ATACR would mean saving for several more months and training with a red dot until then in it's pace. For someone like me, is it worth it?
I know we're comparing a FFP to a SFP here, but if I'm looking for a general purpose optic to Run N Gun with and engage targets from 25m-600m, should I save twice as much for the ATACR over a Razor? I've shot guns with both optics, and both seem very nice, but I guess I'm merely looking for people who have more experience on both to shed some light on the more nuanced aspects of each.
I'll be upgrading from a Vortex Viper PST 1-4. Either one of these two will be a noticable improvement for Run N Gun comps. I value durability over most anything else, and am willing to pay more if it means the difference of being able to trust my equipment.
I'm not rich, so choosing the ATACR would mean saving for several more months and training with a red dot until then in it's pace. For someone like me, is it worth it?
Last edited: