Update:
I see this trend as getting worse. On the 17th this guy starts a thread, and forget for the moment his naïve original question which I didn't criticize at all, he ends up showing himself to be less informed than he claims to be. How does he handle it? By telling me to shove it up my ass and making accusations that he's being 'misinterpreted' while blaming what happened on the people who replied to him.
Today is the 27th, and ten days later he won't stop complaining about me that I know nothing, have no 'actual experience' (whatever that means), and that I have contributed nothing to his thread. Did I contribute nothing: No detailed KSAs? No instructional standards? No explanations of LE training vs. civilian training? No legal definitions? No framework for analysis of instructors? Decide for yourself, here's the thread:
http://www.snipershide.com/shooting...ons-civvies-do-they-really-check-quality.html
But this is the best part: Here's what he sends me today. It must have taken him quite a while to write it and yet he says he's not bothered by me whatsoever. Then using classic hit-and-run tactics he deletes it soon after I read it, probably thinking that I can't retrieve it. And all that work just to call ME the Troll and to keep insisting that his dick is bigger than mine. Here's the PM I got today:
He posts in his thread that he is going to stop replying to me, but he doesn't. Then he writes to me to say that he has stopped replying to my BS, but a few minutes later he replies again on the Thread. All the while proclaiming his own credibility.
This is why I love the Internet: Because you simply can't make this stuff up.