Re: I've tasted the Hensoldt koolaid...
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Sharac</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">My point is, it's an investment, just like the rifle itself.</div></div>
You buy rifles as investment??? You'll get better returns using stocks/options and some education in shorting (as everything goes down the drain
) or just investing in real assets...
<span style="font-weight: bold">First, I'm going to acknowledge right off the bat that your location says "Slovenia" so I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt concerning the definition of the English word "investment". "Investment does not necessarily mean gaining a monetary return. There are many benefits besides an almighty dollar to be taken into consideration. However, to give you an example: If I bought stock in company "A" and bought 10K shares at $100 a share and took a quarterly dividend, I would make a substantial amount of money over five years. Now at the end of five years I sold that stock for the same price I paid for it, it may not be a "great" investment, but I sure took away quite a bit in dividends, so aren't those dividends worth something? </span>
I DO understand people who buy Hensoldt for business (SWATS, governments etc..

, i will even understand people who buy the best and the most expensive stuff there is just to feel special but i will never ever understand someone who will buy a Hensoldt for investment WTF is your notion of investment??? Buy Hensoldt for 3k today and sell it for 2800$ in five years and feel good about yourself for losing 200$ in 5 years that is not investment thats losing money????---> unless you have "wannabe" sindrome...
<span style="font-weight: bold">Why is buying a quality product "wannabe" sYndrom? Are you the same guy that says a Yugo or Lada is the same as a Mercedes because both cars will get you where you need to go? Or where do you take into consideration the benefit of use? If I shoot every weekend for five years that would be 260 weekends of shooting. If I only loose $200 over five years I've paid less than a $1 a weekend to "use" the top of the line scope. So I reap a benefit (pleasure of use) regardless of the dollar lost. Your logic is so flawed I don't even know where to start taking it apart. Bottom line: You have NO idea what you're talking about. Here's an example. Is David Tubb a "wannabe"? He's not military or LEO. Is the entire F-Class teams of "X" countries "wannabes"? What if you were prior military or LEO? I would like you to tell David Tubb that he's a "wannabe" shooter because he's shooting a S&B and not in the military.</span>
I had opportunity to use 6-24x72 and while i do admit scope is great and undoubtedly one of the brightest outthere i will also say that my 300$ Hawke performs absolutely THE SAME up to 1000m (target shooting only mind you).
<span style="font-weight: bold">Every type of shooting is "target" shooting even if that target is shooting back so trying to qualify your remarks by stating "target" only doesn't work</span>.</div></div>
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Sharac</div><div class="ubbcode-body">IF YOU took time to read...but YOU don't...
For my type of shooting (getting rifle from the safe to car to shooting range and shooting 80% < 300m and sometimes up to a 1000y) hawke is more than enough, it tracks, it displays image so i can see the target and so far it works ( I NEVER said it's for everyone let alone hard use or that glass is spectacular - as i allready said in several hawke threads). You can smirk all you want but the fact is even a 300$ scope if built correctly WILL WORK and difference in NORMAL conditions will not be that great (as some of you preach it to be)...
Did i say Hawke is in the same ballpark as Hensoldt? NO
<span style="font-weight: bold">Actually, you did. This is what you said " i will also say that my 300$ Hawke performs absolutely THE SAME up to 1000m (target shooting only mind you)" Here you are saying that your Hawke is "THE SAME" as a Hendsoldt. </span>
Did i say Hensoldt is piece of shit? NO
<span style="font-weight: bold">No, but you implied it to be a bad "investment" even though you don't know what you're talking about.</span>
What i DID SAY is that for some shooters 300$ scope is more than enough AND that buying a scope as investment is bullcrap. So cool off your jets and relax your favorite koolaid still tastes sweet...
<span style="font-weight: bold">The only people that a $300 scope is good for are people that can't afford anything else. Your entire diatribe shows your ignorance about scopes and points out that you have NO idea of how to tell the difference in quality between good and bad. Of course with your vast experience of taking your rifle from safe to car to clean manicured range should make you an expert on why the durability, accuracy and reliability doesn't matter in rifle scope. When I'm at the Bash banging my Hendsoldt around on trucks, buses, wood barriers, et al, I'll make sure to wonder if I should gone with the Hawke as it surely must be a better use of my money. </span> </div></div>