J.D Vance
- Thread starter mvphilly
- Start date
Nobody I know thinks Trump should replace Vance, and none of them has heard that, so it must just be a Dem talking point.
Trump could've appointed Jesus Christ and the Dems would find something to bitch about.
Why? Cause he's fucking Chuck "I'm a leftist cocksucker" Schumer. Ah...did you ride the short bus to school or do you just not get partisan politics in the new millennium?
Wow....I see you are from NY....never mind.
I'm not sold on Vance, but yeah, he'll probably have OH on board and maybe help with some other rust belt states.
But that cocksucker Schumer is last one I'd take advice from!
But that cocksucker Schumer is last one I'd take advice from!
If Schumer wants us to believe that they don't like Vance, and they are banking on us wanting what he doesn't want, that means there are issues with Vance we need to be concerned about.
I'm sure there's a razor for that.
I'm hoping on debate night Trump gets a "cold" and has to sub JD in his place against the Kamel. I think Vance would stay focused and tear her apart.
Vance is tied to Peter Thiel. Changed his name 3 times, and wrote a book about rich vs poor. Was avid Never Trumper and I think he is fake and manufactured just like Obama, just from the (((right))) side of big money and deep state. He was installed to (((handle))) Trump like Paul Ryan, Pence. Mark my words.
Well if Chucky Schumer say's replace him.. and O says replace him.. and CNN hates him, along with ABC, CBS, and PBS.......
what does your spidey sense tell you????
These are the same people who have been telling EVERYONE that Joe Bide is FINE, sharp as a tack.//// up until 2 weeks ago.
if you really have to question why the commies want to replace JD.......
That's like voting for the person who IRAN supports..... hint, IRAN supports Obama and Biden...and soon Harris..
IF every COMMIE leadership in the world supports a certain candidate, that should tell you a bit about the candidate.
Remember a few years ago when he stated he would rather vote for Hillary then trump.....
Pepperidge farm does.....
Never underestimate how low the dems will go. Even after being debunked, they continue the russian hoax and good people on both sides lies and will do so until they no longer breathe. They are the ones who devised the maxim, "die with the lie."
So, yes, they will light a match under everything, flammable or not, hoping to get lucky, like a fisherman with a net. Something is bound to show up.
And the dems do not care that you know that. Not at all. They can, have, and will lie to your face. Tell you that the sun is blue while standing outside with not a cloud in the sky.
the mic hates vance. he won't support their endless wars.
the political machines that use that money to buy politicians and the politicians that are typically bought with this war money are apoplectic, understandably.
think about it. iraq/afghanistan gave them $2 trillion dollars to skim off of, for over 20 years...
the political machines that use that money to buy politicians and the politicians that are typically bought with this war money are apoplectic, understandably.
think about it. iraq/afghanistan gave them $2 trillion dollars to skim off of, for over 20 years...
JD vance is assassination insurance.
Dems and RINOs wanted an insider, they didn't get it.
Dems and RINOs wanted an insider, they didn't get it.
I agree. I think the The Deep State, citizens of the world, woke and in charge hate Vance even more than Trump. He is even less likely than Trump to start a war. They both clearly care about people, and nothing enrages these misanthropes more than leadership that does not see people as a resource to be used for more power and money.
Of anyone out there Trump and Vance both have the fewest weak spots, and are the least likely to be controlled by the permanent state.
Of anyone out there Trump and Vance both have the fewest weak spots, and are the least likely to be controlled by the permanent state.
Thats one way of looking at it but if he is a albatross on the campaign what better way of making sure he stays there than having the Dems say Trump should replace him. Its the old cirss cross,reverse psychology.
Yep! His wife is super anti-trump as well. She is just liking him at the moment to get her husband in the office. That’s it. I don’t believe they are genuine. Trumps mistake is that he is still looking for candidates within the political sphere. He needs to be looking outside that realm and to a common man. Anyone not plastered to politics in any way would be a good start. Clearly he has not learned from his last go around so I’m not sure things would be any different than last time even if he gets back in.
Ok, so I was excessively snarky but WTF…. do you really think that was an intelligent question? One not obvious on the face of it?
Cheers
Its OK dude I was just funning with you. Color me suspicious when Fuck Schumer is involved. When he is wearing those glasses down on the edge of his nose I immediately think fucking shyster.
Vance is inconsistent. I'm not certain even he knows who he is, yet. That makes him not trustworthy, for me. However, given the options, I'm voting Trump/Vance.
Having been a Marine I feel he is much less likely to throw Americans into a meat grinder for no good reason.... I hope so anyway.
I, personally, think Vance is a mistake. Heck, Vivek would have been a better choice or Ben Carson. Vance had repeatedly besmirched Trump and the guy is creepy
And that would be probably the main reason Trump chose him. Like so many other never Trumpers out there who've turned pro-Trump.
It doesn't matter
Go vote do your civic duty
We are all fucking fucked no matter what happens
Go vote do your civic duty
We are all fucking fucked no matter what happens
I think Trump is a fucking retard for not picking a black VP doesn't he know you got to play identity politics just like the left does. It would have helped pull in more of the black vote and harder for the MSM to pull the race card like they love to do.
This. Lots of awesome people he could have chose. Candice Owens anyone?
I still think Mark Robinson would’ve been interesting to watch.
Not that it matters though.
Not that it matters though.
Since we're throwing out names of who we would've chose, I'll throw mine into the hat. As of late I been really liking Thomas Massie the more and more I see from him. That's my choice.
Vance is an opportunist who lacks consistent political values, aiming primarily to ascend the political ladder. His rapid shifts in position to align with his political ambitions are evident in his past actions.
His selection as the vice-presidential candidate is primarily motivated by the hope that he will attract votes from the rust belt.
During his last term, Trump struggled to deliver the jobs and economic growth he promised. By 2019, before the impact of COVID-19, his administration's manufacturing gains were negligible. The tariffs implemented under his administration largely benefited the elite, leading to higher consumer prices, while modern steel production remained predominantly automated.
The strategy behind choosing Mr. Vance is to divert voter attention from Trump's past performance and present Vance as relatable to those voting for him and not Trump.
People selectively overlook that U.S. economic growth had already slowed significantly before 2020. Once the initial excitement faded and policies were enacted, the economy began to falter. Trump's administration fell short of its growth targets by over 25%, with trends progressively worsening.
Additionally, rising crime rates (homicides particularly), an escalating housing crisis (with housing prices increasing by approximately 27%, the largest in history starting in April 2020 to the end of his term), and the pandemic-induced economic shutdown in 2020 by Trumps administration, which added substantial national debt, marred the last two years of his term. The Federal Reserve had to significantly raise interest rates to curb spending and temper demand, with limited success so far.
Trump grew the national debt quicker than any other president in modern history outside of Regan with his 180%+ additional debt.
The economic landscape was far from smooth during Trump's presidency. While the wealthy experienced significant gains, the poor saw little movement, and the middle class faced stagnant growth and increasing financial challenges, including new tax burdens due to the local tax caps under the TCJA. With the TCJA set to expire in 2025, ordinary citizens will lose many benefits it provided, while corporations retain their advantages. Consequently, the average taxpayer is likely to become poorer as result, with corporate profits increasing and tax burdens decreasing. Funny how that works.
Anyhow, as long as my guy wins what does it matter.
His selection as the vice-presidential candidate is primarily motivated by the hope that he will attract votes from the rust belt.
During his last term, Trump struggled to deliver the jobs and economic growth he promised. By 2019, before the impact of COVID-19, his administration's manufacturing gains were negligible. The tariffs implemented under his administration largely benefited the elite, leading to higher consumer prices, while modern steel production remained predominantly automated.
The strategy behind choosing Mr. Vance is to divert voter attention from Trump's past performance and present Vance as relatable to those voting for him and not Trump.
People selectively overlook that U.S. economic growth had already slowed significantly before 2020. Once the initial excitement faded and policies were enacted, the economy began to falter. Trump's administration fell short of its growth targets by over 25%, with trends progressively worsening.
Additionally, rising crime rates (homicides particularly), an escalating housing crisis (with housing prices increasing by approximately 27%, the largest in history starting in April 2020 to the end of his term), and the pandemic-induced economic shutdown in 2020 by Trumps administration, which added substantial national debt, marred the last two years of his term. The Federal Reserve had to significantly raise interest rates to curb spending and temper demand, with limited success so far.
Trump grew the national debt quicker than any other president in modern history outside of Regan with his 180%+ additional debt.
The economic landscape was far from smooth during Trump's presidency. While the wealthy experienced significant gains, the poor saw little movement, and the middle class faced stagnant growth and increasing financial challenges, including new tax burdens due to the local tax caps under the TCJA. With the TCJA set to expire in 2025, ordinary citizens will lose many benefits it provided, while corporations retain their advantages. Consequently, the average taxpayer is likely to become poorer as result, with corporate profits increasing and tax burdens decreasing. Funny how that works.
Anyhow, as long as my guy wins what does it matter.
That's pretty much verbatim of what has happened in every OECD country over the exact same timeframe.
Ignore him- he sounds like a vaxxed democrat.
No matter. The last election was just a proof of concept. The have perfected the steal
Biden was replaced because no one would believe the steal. The Harris steal will be easy to get people to believe.
Biden was replaced because no one would believe the steal. The Harris steal will be easy to get people to believe.
Last edited:
Thanks you DNC spokesperson. Don’t believe what your personal economy was doing before Covid, listen to our rhetoric on it. Clinton is the last Democrat that didn’t stagnate our economy, and that’s ONLY because of the .com boom. By Obama expecting a socialist 2% growth rate is considered the norm.
Basically everything you said is either a lie or spin. Democrat policies are economic poison.
The problem with Vance is that he's basically a younger inexperienced Trump "Mini-Me". Ohio is already a red state, and Vance's influence over other states is questionable at best. Usually you try to pick a VP that enhances or fills in a gap that the primary candidate is missing. Vance really does none of that. The Democrats will amplify his lack of experienced when compared to Harris, and his hard-right views don't do anything to lure moderates or independent voters. Also, he seems to not be doing himself any favors as he alienates various constituent groups (ref: "childless cat lady" comments). I just don't see a single vote coming to the Republican ticket because of Vance, that wasn't already solidly locked in for Trump. I just feel like it was a wasted opportunity in what is going to be a VERY close election.
You are a childless cat lady.
Women who dream of promiscuity and then murdering their unborn babies are committed Democrats. Keep them.
Trump Vance is
+30% in the economy
*80% on immigration
The two top issues.
You leftists are completely crazy if you think Kamala (1% in the last race for the DNC nomination) isn’t going to get blown out of the swing states. She’s almost as big a disaster as Biden.
I know you hate Trump, but you’re smoking crack if you think she can beat him on Biden’s record. Literally the worst choice you could have made offering America more of the same disastrous policies.
Not going to be close at all unless there is egregious fraud, and this time you’re not going to be able to hide it with honor system voting.
Women who dream of promiscuity and then murdering their unborn babies are committed Democrats. Keep them.
Trump Vance is
+30% in the economy
*80% on immigration
The two top issues.
You leftists are completely crazy if you think Kamala (1% in the last race for the DNC nomination) isn’t going to get blown out of the swing states. She’s almost as big a disaster as Biden.
I know you hate Trump, but you’re smoking crack if you think she can beat him on Biden’s record. Literally the worst choice you could have made offering America more of the same disastrous policies.
Not going to be close at all unless there is egregious fraud, and this time you’re not going to be able to hide it with honor system voting.
Good luck with “overshadowing” Trump. Teddy Roosevelt isn’t available.
Your last sentence is the telling one.They will not need egregious fraud just enough in those 5 0r 6 swing states.Just look at the total votes DJT "allegedly lost by" in those 5 Blue Wall States.Not much really and since they did it once you can bet they have enhanced the technique in the last four years.Dont get me wrong in a Fair fight Trump landslides both Harris and Biden combined but this is no where near fair.
