You caught me, oh man.Ignore him- he sounds like a vaxxed democrat.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below!
Join the contestYou caught me, oh man.Ignore him- he sounds like a vaxxed democrat.
CSM Don PurdySince we're throwing out names of who we would've chose, I'll throw mine into the hat. As of late I been really liking Thomas Massie the more and more I see from him. That's my choice.
So, you are saying they are actually running Mike and not Kamala?Anyhow, as long as my guy wins what does it matter.
Wow, man, great comeback.Thanks you DNC spokesperson. Don’t believe what your personal economy was doing before Covid, listen to our rhetoric on it. Clinton is the last Democrat that didn’t stagnate our economy, and that’s ONLY because of the .com boom. By Obama expecting a socialist 2% growth rate is considered the norm.
Basically everything you said is either a lie or spin. Democrat policies are economic poison.
Leftist generalities which I'm certain can be proven "mostly false", in particular the black employment and income levels under Trump.Wow, man, great comeback.
I spent an hour of my fun time writing a reply with facts an figures, but just deleted it. How about you show me what I lied about.
After all the burden of proof falls on you for making the accusation that I'm full of shit. Why should I spend the time to show you how I'm right when I already did the work, and know the answer.
Go for it!
Here you go https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS14000006Leftist generalities which I'm certain can be proven "mostly false", in particular the black employment and income levels under Trump.
You finished it off with a passive aggressive sarcastic jab. The entire post sounds like leftest talking points run through chatGPT to try to sound intelligent.
Let's look at the last several VPs.The problem with Vance is that he's basically a younger inexperienced Trump "Mini-Me". Ohio is already a red state, and Vance's influence over other states is questionable at best. Usually you try to pick a VP that enhances or fills in a gap that the primary candidate is missing. Vance really does none of that. The Democrats will amplify his lack of experienced when compared to Harris, and his hard-right views don't do anything to lure moderates or independent voters. Also, he seems to not be doing himself any favors as he alienates various constituent groups (ref: "childless cat lady" comments). I just don't see a single vote coming to the Republican ticket because of Vance, that wasn't already solidly locked in for Trump. I just feel like it was a wasted opportunity in what is going to be a VERY close election.
Okay... a fucking tranny Weirdo telling us we is weird, well sure from these fucked up inthe head ass clown since it is very obvious.
To be fair, he did bring a different way of spelling potatos.Dan Quayle no one knows what he brought to the table.
The only number that matters are people's take home adjusted for inflation. It's been wiped out by Bidenomics inflation. I don't know a single person who feels like they're making good money anymore. Yes, investments are up. That's not a person's personal economy.Wow, man, great comeback.
I spent an hour of my fun time writing a reply with facts an figures, but just deleted it. How about you show me what I lied about.
After all the burden of proof falls on you for making the accusation that I'm full of shit. Why should I spend the time to show you how I'm right when I already did the work, and know the answer.
Go for it!
Hold on. We are dumping on Vance for his changing tune, but Owen's is inscrutable?This. Lots of awesome people he could have chose. Candice Owens anyone?
Some people will exept any explanation from and "expert." They will steal it again. Just like in Venezeula. They will piss on everyone again and tell them it's raining.Maybe, but the number of people who suspect fraud in 2020 has risen from about 35% to almost 50% in the ensuing years. If half the people suspect fraud it's going to be a lot harder to get away with it.
Laura Trump isn't playing according to the way she's running the RNC.
https://apnews.com/article/rnc-elec...-voter-fraud-997947656e0b5d5d16cc4353bd726452
Election Integrity | Republican National Committee
Republican National Committee Election Integrityrepublicannationalcommittee.org
The discussion doesn’t even have to get into the details concerning the financial hardships of now vs. 2017-2020 to highlight the stark contrast between the conservatives & the debauchery that now makes up the Demons taking up space in the Democrat party.Okay... a fucking tranny Weirdo telling us we is weird, well sure from these fucked up inthe head ass clown since it is very obvious.
It’s France.Yea, watching the opening of the Olympics...
View attachment 8469299
How well has “luring moderates” been working so far? There is no such thing as a “big tent”, especially now. The left does not apologize for its stances. “Moderates” are cognitively impaired or too weak to admit the reality we live in.The problem with Vance is that he's basically a younger inexperienced Trump "Mini-Me". Ohio is already a red state, and Vance's influence over other states is questionable at best. Usually you try to pick a VP that enhances or fills in a gap that the primary candidate is missing. Vance really does none of that. The Democrats will amplify his lack of experienced when compared to Harris, and his hard-right views don't do anything to lure moderates or independent voters. Also, he seems to not be doing himself any favors as he alienates various constituent groups (ref: "childless cat lady" comments). I just don't see a single vote coming to the Republican ticket because of Vance, that wasn't already solidly locked in for Trump. I just feel like it was a wasted opportunity in what is going to be a VERY close election.
Interesting podcast about the globalist who propped Vance up. BewareVance is tied to Peter Thiel. Changed his name 3 times, and wrote a book about rich vs poor. Was avid Never Trumper and I think he is fake and manufactured just like Obama, just from the (((right))) side of big money and deep state. He was installed to (((handle))) Trump like Paul Ryan, Pence. Mark my words.
I'm a moderate, and an independent voter. I vote for candidates based upon their view on issues of importance to me, and on my perception of their integrity and devotion to democracy. You say that makes me "weak". I believe the contrary, that compromise, focus on policy instead of dogma, and not allowing myself to be pigeon-holed into a forced set of beliefs ... is a strength. It's also a strength that I will defend to the death, your right to believe anything you want about me, irrespective of how uninformed those beliefs may be.How well has “luring moderates” been working so far? There is no such thing as a “big tent”, especially now. The left does not apologize for its stances. “Moderates” are cognitively impaired or too weak to admit the reality we live in.
It is to your credit that you still believe in the system and the calm deliberate measured approach. My father is similar; he cannot fathom how depraved and evil the individuals and organizations are that oppose freedom in the western world.I'm a moderate, and an independent voter. I vote for candidates based upon their view on issues of importance to me, and on my perception of their integrity and devotion to democracy. You say that makes me "weak". I believe the contrary, that compromise, focus on policy instead of dogma, and not allowing myself to be pigeon-holed into a forced set of beliefs ... is a strength. It's also a strength that I will defend to the death, your right to believe anything you want about me, irrespective of how uninformed those beliefs may be.
Alomst as if it were planned idiocracy.I think historically looking back, the two largest destructive actions to kill America will be the huge level of government growth and unlimited spending and completely open borders allowing uncontrolled entry of terrorists and foreign military to fully infiltrate America.
This will be Biden's legacy.
How to say that you are wishy-washy and not likely to make a stand without saying it.I'm a moderate, and an independent voter. I vote for candidates based upon their view on issues of importance to me, and on my perception of their integrity and devotion to democracy. You say that makes me "weak". I believe the contrary, that compromise, focus on policy instead of dogma, and not allowing myself to be pigeon-holed into a forced set of beliefs ... is a strength. It's also a strength that I will defend to the death, your right to believe anything you want about me, irrespective of how uninformed those beliefs may be.
You'd better be concerned about a candidate's dogma. Their dogma, comprises their faith, morals and ethics. Their dogma defines their world view, which determines the bigger part of their view of the USA and the policies they will enable that shape society. Lack of concern for politician's dogma and core beliefs are what has gotten us into the mess we have, now.I'm a moderate, and an independent voter. I vote for candidates based upon their view on issues of importance to me, and on my perception of their integrity and devotion to democracy. You say that makes me "weak". I believe the contrary, that compromise, focus on policy instead of dogma, and not allowing myself to be pigeon-holed into a forced set of beliefs ... is a strength. It's also a strength that I will defend to the death, your right to believe anything you want about me, irrespective of how uninformed those beliefs may be.
That and a rope shortage.You'd better be concerned about a candidate's dogma. Their dogma, comprises their faith, morals and ethics. Their dogma defines their world view, which determines the bigger part of their view of the USA and the policies they will enable that shape society. Lack of concern for politician's dogma and core beliefs are what has gotten us into the mess we have, now.
I'm a moderate, and an independent voter. I vote for candidates based upon their view on issues of importance to me, and on my perception of their integrity and devotion to democracy. You say that makes me "weak". I believe the contrary, that compromise, focus on policy instead of dogma, and not allowing myself to be pigeon-holed into a forced set of beliefs ... is a strength. It's also a strength that I will defend to the death, your right to believe anything you want about me, irrespective of how uninformed those beliefs may be.
I realize this forum isn't a place where I'll see any tolerance for alternate perspectives, or even an attempt to understand the value of compromise and civil debate. I agree with you ... I should stick to the ballistics forums and realize that if I want introspection and tolerance, I should spend more time with my dogs ... LOL.How to say that you are wishy-washy and not likely to make a stand without saying it.
I realize this forum isn't a place where I'll see any tolerance for alternate perspectives, or even an attempt to understand the value of compromise and civil debate. I agree with you ... I should stick to the ballistics forums and realize that if I want introspection and tolerance, I should spend more time with my dogs ... LOL.That said, I find the ballistics forums here are super helpful and I really enjoy exercising my 1st and 2nd Amendment rights here. THANK YOU to the people that created and manage this social network. It's been a big part of my journey to improve my tools and skills.
Man, ALL of us have different beliefs. However, we have a core set of beliefs that draw us together. I've jumped into a few threads to challenge and have been challenged. Don't take it personally. Keep your cool and defend your position logically, or at least be ready to discuss the source of your values. We give respect to those who conduct themselves in this manner and that includes modicum of tolerance. Don't be like the libs, who can't defend their beliefs and have a meltdown the second they are challenged with facts and logic.I realize this forum isn't a place where I'll see any tolerance for alternate perspectives, or even an attempt to understand the value of compromise and civil debate. I agree with you ... I should stick to the ballistics forums and realize that if I want introspection and tolerance, I should spend more time with my dogs ... LOL.That said, I find the ballistics forums here are super helpful and I really enjoy exercising my 1st and 2nd Amendment rights here. THANK YOU to the people that created and manage this social network. It's been a big part of my journey to improve my tools and skills.
It doesn't matter
Go vote do your civic duty
We are all fucking fucked no matter what happens
Teddy Roosevelt the trust buster? I wonder how he felt about trickle down economics. Leader of the Rough Riders charging up San Juan hill? I wonder if he had bunions. The man who was crushed by the death of his wife? I wonder how many porn stars he slept with.Good luck with “overshadowing” Trump. Teddy Roosevelt isn’t available.
And how many times he was told that he looked like New York City Police Commissioner Reagan.Teddy Roosevelt the trust buster? I wonder how he felt about trickle down economics. Leader of the Rough Riders charging up San Juan hill? I wonder if he had bunions. The man who was crushed by the death of his wife? I wonder how many porn stars he slept with.
If you want to ignore Trumps faults because of the good he does fine. But don’t compare him to Teddy. Teddy would have eaten him alive.
Compromise and civil debates are what got us to where we are in this society.
Our side has only wanted to be left alone.
The other side wants what we have and insists that we compromise.
They have nothing to offer, they only want to take.
Compromise from us just means giving up more.
I'm a moderate, and an independent voter. I vote for candidates based upon their view on issues of importance to me, and on my perception of their integrity and devotion to democracy. You say that makes me "weak". I believe the contrary, that compromise, focus on policy instead of dogma, and not allowing myself to be pigeon-holed into a forced set of beliefs ... is a strength. It's also a strength that I will defend to the death, your right to believe anything you want about me, irrespective of how uninformed those beliefs may be.
Soon enough, they will. So, take your weapons on a boat ride in Nebraska and watch out for rough seas.We all laugh at the leftists marching at whatever university but keep in mind those leftists would kill us all if they could figure out how to do it. It's not a matter of misinformation or they watch the wrong TV shows or listen to the wrong "facts", they really do hate and want to destroy everyone who isn't like them. The only reason they aren't doing it en masse right now is they don't have the numbers or the guts.
This shows that you have no real understanding of history or politics and just like to follow the crowd. I know T. R. is super popular among Trump fans right now, which is wild.Good luck with “overshadowing” Trump. Teddy Roosevelt isn’t available.
Actually I do, and your exposition is completely misplaced. You are 100% correct, and I agree with everything you said. I was only talking about TR's larger than life persona, and his outsized use of the "bully pulpit". TR thought that his officers uniform wasn't spangley enough for him, so he designed his own bespoke uniform when he led The Rough Riders and crawled up San Juan Hill. That should tell you something about him. He did a couple of things right, but I would say they were for the wrong reasons. The one place I think you are mistaken is trying to project him into today. Totally different zeitgeist, different circumstances, and different country. You can't draw straight lines from then to now, because people thought very differently and held a lot of things to be true that we now know aren't. Much of his conservation efforts and his federal attacks on business were reactions to what was physically happening rather than came from deep seated political ideology. I think he was more practical than you give him credit for, but the moniker of Progressive (idiot) still fits.This shows that you have no real understanding of history or politics and just like to follow the crowd. I know T. R. is super popular among Trump fans right now, which is wild.
However, he was a progressive and would be more in line with AOC today than anyone on the right.
The GOP has embraced him mainly due to his love of hunting. In 1912, he advocated for socialized reform with the Bull Moose Party, a progressive party he created. He is one of the reasons we have Medicare and Medicaid today.
Roosevelt was also a strong advocate for corporate regulation, workers rights, environmental protections, preservation of natural resources, the FDA (he did create the agency, after all), higher taxes (he literally ran calling for a constitutional amendment for establishing income tax) for the wealthy through progressive tax reforms, civil rights, securities reform ( we would eventually get the SEC), along with other leftist policies, and including a big shocker for many, gun control.
He'd basically be considered a commie today by the right.
Conservatives hated the guy; this is why he left the Republican Party and formed the Bull Moose Party. It was his attempt to pursue a platform focused on the progressive social reforms he advocated for.
But, sure, idolize the guy as if he would be on the side of Trump, a man who embodies everything he was against.
Now show me one thing I've said above that isn't factual.
But it's moot, nobody cares about the actual facts, only how it makes them feel as if they're children still.
I lean left on a number of social issues, but T. R. is even too far left for me. I'm an absolutist when it comes to the 2A, and in favor of exploitation of the resources of this country among a many other things. Unlike Teddy.