Oh, I'm for the constitution all the way, but that's not the issue. The issue is that 2a advocates seem to only frame the issues of gun usage in the absolute language of a constitutional right. This approach induces the other side to consider regulations like that cited by the OP which erode the right. Tactically, it would be better to change the conversation - recognize the issue and offer alternatives.
As to your question, I live in Virginia.
This post (and your previous one) is EXACTLY what I am talking about. With road maps such as England, Australia, California, NY , Connecticut etc. it is lunacy to purport that if we cede ground the anti-2A Marxist Democrats will be assuaged. How many places in this country can you not even carry a 3 1/2 inch pocket knife for fear of arrest.
Bloomberg’s machine is become a freight train and it is gaining momentum In California you can’t order ammo online nor purchase it without a background check now. Want a newer handgun , well most new handguns are not on California’s “approved list” . Guns like the Gen 4 & 5 Glock.
Bloomberg’s machine purports itself as a supporter of 2A and “reasonable gun control”. Yet they staunchly oppose any reasonable gun rights from our side like HPA and National CCW Reciprocity.
Make no mistake. These groups want all our guns, and talk of appeasement and division within our ranks is all part of the master plan. A sizable group of gun owners (like my brother) will fall for it every time. We also pretend that while holes are shot in our boat in states like California, if we just move to the other side we will not sink with them.
To say we have not offered solutions is disengenious at best and parrots CNN. We have. Our solutions to mass shhoting are as follows.
Shoot back -OFTEN!
Most importantly STOP MAKING THESE ASSHOLE FAMOUS. The gun is simply a megaphone.