Rifle Scopes Leupold...My Apology and Challenge ***Updated***

BAT_Boy

critter_bill
Full Member
Minuteman
Sep 1, 2005
390
24
Williamston, SC
I had previously posted of my disgust with Leupold for refusing to service my Premier modified Mark 4 rifle scope. I stated that I would smash this scope, upon its return from Leupold to display my contempt with Leupold.

Men whom I respect, with cooler heads and more inside industry knowledge than I, have informed me that at no time did Leupold ever warranty the power boost that was done to my scope by Dick Thomas of Premier Reticle. The reticle change, yes, but not the power boost. I was not made aware of this by Premier Reticle.

Sadly, Mr. Thomas is no longer with us to confirm or deny this, so I accept responsibility for my uninformed decision to have the power boost done. Leupold is not responsible for support of the conversion, therefore <span style="font-weight: bold">I humbly apologize to Leupold and my fellow shooters for my anger, disgust, and ill-will directed at them on this issue.
</span>

Leupold's refusal to provide service parts to Premier Reticles for continued support of prior conversions <span style="font-weight: bold">is</span> despicable and bears my continued disgust. This action has left a lot of customers hanging.

If Leupold will not supply the parts to Premier Reticle to service the converted scopes then Premier cannot repair or service these scopes and honor their lifetime warranty. I will not sully the good name and memory of Dick Thomas, but had he informed me that the power boost would be glued in, thereby voiding any future Leupold warranty or service, I would not have taken that route. Too late for that. My bad.

Leupold service had advised me that the return to original factory condition was cost-prohibitive---about half the cost of a new scope. In frustration, I had intentions of smashing this scope upon its return from Leupold. In light of the new findings, this would serve no useful purpose. Therefore, I will re-return the scope to Leupold for the following:

Since <span style="font-weight: bold">JasonK</span> has recently met the manager of the new Leupold Tactical Division, I will seek the contact information of this man from Jasonk. I will send this scope directly to him with a blank check for a total factory rebuild with his personal inspection/approval/guarantee that the Mildot Reticle position will be within <span style="font-weight: bold">±1°</span> of dimensioned specification. If <span style="font-weight: bold">Lowlight</span> is willing to participate, I will have the scope shipped to him for a week's evaluation at <span style="font-weight: bold">Rifles Only.</span> After this evaluation, Lowlight will then either ship the scope to me with his blessings or return it to Leupold for any needed corrections.

I will probably end up with a $2300 Leupold Mark 4 M1 16X Mildot scope, but if it has the best efforts of the new Leupold Tactical Manager behind it, it will be worth it.

I'm a firm believer in education and this is my tuition. <span style="font-weight: bold">Leupold, here is your chance to shine!</span>

BAT_Boy

********* Original Post, for Reference Only ***********

I just reviewed my records and found that I had purchased 26 Leupold optics between 1987 and 2008. Three of those were Mark 4 M1 16X scopes that were sent to Premier Reticle for their power boost to 35x and installation of a fine crosshair and 1/8 minute target dot. All three conversions were performed by Dick Thomas, just months before his untimely death, and were covered by Premier and Leupold lifetime warranties.

After Dick's passing, Premier and Leupold soon parted ways, with both companies stating, on their websites, that they would continue to warranty/service conversions performed prior to their separation date. Soon after, Leupold refused to provide parts to Premier to continue their support.

Fast forward to 2010. I have sold two of the three Premier conversions to 1,000 yard BR shooters. I kept the third scope for my remaining BR rifle. Since I've moved from BR to tactical and AR-15 rifles, I called Leupold to see if they would return the Mark 4 to original condition as a 16X with Mildot reticle. They instructed me to return the scope for evaluation and would provide a labor quote at that time. After hearing nothing for one week after delivery, I called today to follow up and was informed that the scope could be "restored" to factory new condition and returned to me for $329 total. That would cover the installation of the Mildot reticle, a new erector tube system, and shipping/insurance. I agreed to this fee as it was service work and not warranty repair.

Ten minutes later, the Leupold service rep called and stated that they could do no work on this scope since Dick had glued the power boost in place, thereby preventing any further service to this scope. They did offer to replace the main tube and internals for more than half the cost of a new scope. I just can't see having over $2,000 invested in a Mark 4 16X. I then asked if this was the case, how and why was the scope ever covered by warranty by either Leupold or Premier after the conversion. He had no answer, of course. The scope is being returned to me.

I am trying to decide if attempting to contact the President of Leupold Stevens would be worthwhile. There are hundreds, perhaps thousands, of orphaned Premier Reticle conversions with absolutely no support remaining. I am seriously considering filming the application of sledge hammer to scope to show my utter disgust and contempt that I hold for Leupold at this moment.

I have been slowly selling off my Leupolds and upgrading to Nightforce as funds allowed. I did splurge on one S&B 5-25 PMII for my KMW Surgeon. I still had a soft spot for Leupold because it is an American company in hopes that they would regain their senses. No more. Their products, and their word, mean nothing to me now.

BAT_Boy

 
Re: Leupold...My Apology and Challenge

BAT_Boy, I know what you mean. I have several Leupold scopes that have been modified by Premier Reticles, and I did not find out about Leupold not supplying parts until one of these scopes needed repair, and Premier told me they could not do it. Originally, Premier Reticles had been an authorized warranty provider for Leuopld scopes, and thus could repair all of their conversions. I agree with you that Premier Reticles has always been a great company, and I believe that this was Leupold's way of eliminating a competitor who offered products and modifications that they would not.

I have also experienced having to send several Leupold scopes back to Leupold 3 times each, to get one warranty repair done on each. Leupold also told me that they had never seen one of the problems before, even though the man I was talking to was the same one (who shall here go nameless) who had handled the problem on a previously returned scope. He had no answer when I told him this.

After these experiences, I simply do not trust the integrity of Leupold as a company. I have been using Nightforce scopes ever since, and I like them a lot better. Too bad Premier Reticles does not work on them!
 
Re: Leupold...My Apology and Challenge

Well, I certainly wouldn't put any more money into that scope if I were in your position. I'd just use it in the benchrest capacity that the conversion was made for, and leave well enough alone.

Then go buy the scope you want.
 
Re: Leupold...My Apology and Challenge

GUNNER75, I can only tell you what I know from my years of experience with Leupold and Premier. When I first started dealing with Premier, they were an authorized warranty repair station for Leupold, along with doing their own modifications to Leupold scopes. They therefore could warrant all of the work they did, because they could get parts from Leupold, if they were needed. At some time subsequent to that, Leupold started copying some of Premier's ideas, without giving any compensation to Premier for doing so. Leupold's Tactical Milling Reticle (TMR), for example, is almost exactly like one of the reticles that Premier offered first, and Leupold did not come up with it until after they had seen Premier's version. There are other examples, as well. When Leupold finally stopped supplying parts to Premier, it was basically the final blow to Premier's being able to do anything with Leupold scopes.

Leupold also bought up Stoney Point scope knobs, so you can't buy them from Stoney Point any more, and Leupold does not sell them. Obviously, Leupold wanted people to be more dependent on Leupold's target adjustments, which are not even available on all of the scopes that Stoney Point scope knobs would fit.

I could be wrong, but there seems to be a pattern here.
 
Re: Leupold...My Apology and Challenge

Bat_Boy,

I have no problem looking at your scope, but honestly, I think you can do it yourself, it is your scope after all, and my blessing is really not required.

Leupold has been doing this a long time, and while we have seen in an increase in issues, there are still a lot of scopes from them out there working well for their owners.

If you want me to look at it, sure, but honestly I think you might be better served if you took the time to evaluate your scope. I can always email you a set of tests that you can perform.
 
Re: Leupold...My Apology and Challenge

batboy,

Wow, just wow. Look, yours is a tale of woe. I don't envy your position. But who's really to blame?

You are. Not Leupold, not Premier, not some shady nefarious Chicom Optics Merchants, YOU....

You took a perfectly good scope, made by Company A, and had it power boosted by Company B. Nobody twisted your arm, and you got excellent utilty while you used the scope, it did what you wanted.

Now you want to un-ring the bell. Company A says they cannot undo Company B's work and Company B can no longer get parts from Company A. That happens when you go custom. Promises aside, when you alter from OEM, then the OEM is no longer responsible.

What about Premier? They cannot un-ring the bell for you because they do not have the parts anymore, and nowhere to get them from. It's not Leupold's problem, because they did not promise you that they would provide parts forever to Premier.

It's a tough break, but shit happens. And shit happens to even good people, like you. So take a deep breath, relax, and think logically. And please do not drag more people, into fixing, testing, or educating yourself.

So you have three choices:

Destroy the scope. Bad idea, but somehow would provide a relief of your frustration.

Have a full restore job by Leupold. Also a bad idea, because you are throwing good money after bad. Your also enriching Leupold, who you blame in part for this cluster. Who wants a $2300. 16x Leupold anyway?

Best idea, do what you did with the other two. Sell it a benchrest guy who might actually enjoy it.

If you feeling altruistic, find a very young and broke bench-rester, and give him/her the damn scope for free. It does work for the application you originally had it modified for, does it not? Trust me you will feel good about the whole thing.

The last thing you can do, is hang the thing on your wall. So you can look at from time to time. To remind you that it is always easier to turn A into B, then back again......

Best of luck,

Bob
 
Re: Leupold...My Apology and Challenge

I've been respectful of Dick Thomas, because he was a pioneer and contributed much to our military guys. I've no doubt that, were he still with us, the scope would have been made right.

<span style="font-weight: bold">Edited: In fact, I just received a PM from Chris Thomas, President of Premier Reticles, offering to take the scope from B to A (sorry Bob in NC), by removing the boost and installing a duplex reticle at no cost. Then, I am free to return the scope to Leupold for reticle change if desired. It seems that Leupold was capable, but unwilling, of doing the same.

I can't possibly ask for any more than that. Again, I sincerely thank you Chris. You honor your Father.</span>
 
Re: Leupold...My Apology and Challenge

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: BAT_Boy</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I've been respectful of Dick Thomas, because he was a pioneer and contributed much to our military guys. I've no doubt that, were he still with us, the scope would have been made right.

<span style="font-weight: bold">Edited: In fact, I just received a PM from Chris Thomas, President of Premier Reticles, offering to take the scope from B to A (sorry Bob in NC), by removing the boost and installing a duplex reticle at no cost. Then, I am free to return the scope to Leupold for reticle change if desired. It seems that Leupold was capable, but unwilling, of doing the same.

I can't possibly ask for any more than that. Again, I sincerely thank you Chris. You honor your Father.</span> </div></div>

Batboy,

Nope, I'm happy for you. Sounds like a great outcome. When dealing with people of integrity, like the Thomas's, good things just happen.

How about that.....
 
Re: Leupold...My Apology and Challenge

Update: I received the MK4 back from Premier Reticle today. Chris, good as his word, returned the scope to "as new" condition. It is once again an M1, 16X scope with Mildot reticle. This was done at no charge to me although I did offer to pay.

Chris, I can't thank you enough, sir. I sincerely appreciate you stepping up and returning this scope to a useful optic. I wish you much success in your business. Best regards, BAT_Boy.
 
Re: Leupold...My Apology and Challenge

I'm glad to hear the outcome was satisfactory to all BAT_Boy, and will look forward to running that Premier beside the S&B next time we run into each other at GGC.