Load development is a myth?

[morganlamprecht]

Yea the 108 is great

I’ve done the same with more bullets than I can probably remember in other Calibers also…but all ones that have a proven track record for consistency/performance in Berger/hornady/sierra brands mainly


You’re the first person I’ve met who calls that load development though lol everyone else tells me that won’t work for them and they can’t be accurate that way

The semantics does cause a lot of confusion

 

[JR1200W3]

Yea the 108 is great

I’ve done the same with more bullets than I can probably remember in other Calibers also…but all ones that have a proven track record for consistency/performance in Berger/hornady/sierra brands mainly


You’re the first person I’ve met who calls that load development though lol everyone else tells me that won’t work for them and they can’t be accurate that way

The semantics does cause a lot of confusion

You had a goal. Tested the components to calibrate the amount of ingredients. Crafted the recipe to achieve it. And then proofed it. If it didn't meet your goal, you would have made a change. That has always been load development. People do a lot of different things to the same tune. Yes, there are some mislead ideas out there. But the basic process is the same.