Re: Marksmen issued better rifles in Afghanistan
This thread seems to be some sort of magnet for nit picking and shit talking. I dont get it. Anyways, in regard to that picture of the m110 and all of it's accessories. The end user(soldier) will not be forced to carry all of that gear. Just the mission essentials. The armorers and the supply guys will have responsibility for all that gear, and sign it out to the grunts just like always. Also, just because a weapon is not organic to a soldiers unit doesnt mean that he wont care for it. My experience tells me that soldiers will care for this weapon just like any other weapon, because it is their life-line. I have deployed in the sand box as a scout sniper in the 82ns airborne, and have only been out for two years. I doubt that grunts have changed much in two years. Unfortunately this forum seems to contain alot of speculation and misguided verbal rants. If this doesnt apply to you, dont worry about it. As for me, it's kind of turning me off.
This thread seems to be some sort of magnet for nit picking and shit talking. I dont get it. Anyways, in regard to that picture of the m110 and all of it's accessories. The end user(soldier) will not be forced to carry all of that gear. Just the mission essentials. The armorers and the supply guys will have responsibility for all that gear, and sign it out to the grunts just like always. Also, just because a weapon is not organic to a soldiers unit doesnt mean that he wont care for it. My experience tells me that soldiers will care for this weapon just like any other weapon, because it is their life-line. I have deployed in the sand box as a scout sniper in the 82ns airborne, and have only been out for two years. I doubt that grunts have changed much in two years. Unfortunately this forum seems to contain alot of speculation and misguided verbal rants. If this doesnt apply to you, dont worry about it. As for me, it's kind of turning me off.